Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Delayed nitrogen supply did not affect sugarbeet top growth.

A claim from Effect of Incrementing Nitrogen Application on Sucrose Yield of Sugarbeet · 1988

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed nitrogen supply did not affect sugarbeet top growth.

Treatment
Delaying N supply by incrementing fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
top growthe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying N supply by incrementing fertilizer applications favored root development and sucrose production but did not affect top growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1302
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73

Title

Effect of Incrementing Nitrogen Application on Sucrose Yield of Sugarbeet

Frank N. Anderson; Gary A. Peterson Agronomy Journal 1988. doi:10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000050002x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-4e76b7a674b928f81b4fc889aa301736c04c6b6a5b435b5ee7b7955dc07547a5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 97 positive, 11 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 96 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

fertilization · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 97 positive, 12 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 96 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

100 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.