Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Effect of Biochar and Inorganic or Organic Fertilizer Co-Application on Soil Properties, Plant Growth and Nutrient Content in Swiss Chard

Anna Rita Rivelli; Angela Libutti

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

From the perspective of sustainable agri-food production, farmers need to make the best use of natural resources. Biochar can be a solution to adopt a more sustainable way of farming. Despite its environmental and agronomic advantages, biochar has a low plant nutrient value. This study evaluated the effect of biochar and the co-application of an inorganic or organic fertilizer on the soil properties, growth and nutrient content of Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris L. var. cycla, Caryophyllales order, Chenopodiaceae family). The experiment consisted of two factors: biochar type (from vineyard prunings and wood chips) and fertilizing source (ammonium nitrate and vermicompost). Biochars were applied at a 2% rate (w/w) and fertilizers at a dose providing 280 kg N ha−1. The soil properties (pH, EC, extractable anions, cations, total N, Corg and C/N ratio) were measured before the plants were transplanted and at the end of the growing cycle, along with the growth parameters (leaf number, length and fresh weight) of each leaf cut, the productive parameters (total number of leaves and yield per plant) at the end of the growing cycle and the leaf content of anions (NO3−, P2O43−, SO42−), cations (NH4+, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) and total N. The co-application of biochar and a fertilizing source had a positive effect on soil properties and leaf nutrient content. Vermicompost increased plant growth by 22% and plant yield by 116%, in contrast to biochar, and increased limited leaf NO3− accumulation by about 81% in comparison to ammonium nitrate. The co-application of biochar and vermicompost is the better option to increase Swiss chard yield while preserving the nutritional and health qualities of the product.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and fertilizer co-application improved leaf nutrient content.

Treatment
co-application of biochar and a fertilizing sourcee0
Outcome
leaf nutrient contente0
Direction
positive effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The co-application of biochar and a fertilizing source had a positive effect on soil properties and leaf nutrient content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased plant growth by 22% compared with biochar.

Treatment
Vermicomposte0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
biochare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost increased plant growth by 22% and plant yield by 116%, in contrast to biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased yield by 116% compared with biochar.

Treatment
Vermicomposte0
Outcome
plant yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
116%e0
Comparator
biochare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost increased plant growth by 22% and plant yield by 116%, in contrast to biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost increased leaf nitrate accumulation by about 81% relative to ammonium nitrate.

Treatment
Vermicomposte0
Outcome
leaf NO3− accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
about 81%e0
Comparator
ammonium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost increased plant growth by 22% and plant yield by 116%, in contrast to biochar, and increased limited leaf NO3− accumulation by about 81% in comparison to ammonium nitrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Swiss Chard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–137 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 97 positive, 12 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 237 positive, 30 negative or no effect

236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.