Paper · 2017 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Leaf, canopy and agronomic water‐use efficiency of field‐grown sugar beet in response to potassium fertilization

B. Jákli; M. Hauer‐Jákli; F. Böttcher; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Potassium (K) fertilization is important to maintain adequate concentrations of plant available K in agricultural soils to achieve best yields and improve crop stress tolerance and water‐use efficiency ( WUE ). Water‐use efficiency ( WUE ) can be expressed on various spatiotemporal scales, and it is known that responses of WUE to external stress are not uniform across scales. Multiscale evaluations of the impact of varying K fertilization on the WUE of C 3 crops under field conditions are missing so far. In the present field study, we evaluated effects of K fertilization on WUE of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) on short‐termed leaf‐ ( WUE L eaf ) and canopy‐scales (WUE Canopy ) and as the agronomic ratio of white sugar yield ( WSY ) to in‐season water use (i.e. WUE WSY ). In K‐fertilized plots, WUE WSY was enhanced by 15.9%. This effect is attributed to increased beet yield and WSY , as no differences in total in‐season water use between fertilized and unfertilized plots were observed. Potassium (K) fertilization significantly enhanced the leaf area index, resulting in a more efficient depletion of soil moisture by roots in K‐fertilized plots. As a consequence, WUE L eaf was increased due to stomatal adjustment. Potassium (K) improved WUE C anopy only by tendency. It is concluded that K fertilization improves the WUE of field‐grown sugar beet across scales, but processes that regulate WUE are highly scale dependent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization enhanced agronomic white sugar yield water-use efficiency by 15.9%.

Treatment
K‐fertilizede0
Outcome
WUE WSYe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
15.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In K‐fertilized plots, WUE WSY was enhanced by 15.9%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–845 · show in text ↑
e1

“WUE of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization increased beet yield and white sugar yield.

Treatment
fertilizede0
Outcome
beet yield and WSYe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unfertilized plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This effect is attributed to increased beet yield and WSY , as no differences in total in‐season water use between fertilized and unfertilized plots were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“WUE of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total in-season water use did not differ between fertilized and unfertilized plots.

Treatment
fertilizede0
Outcome
total in‐season water usee0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
unfertilized plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences in total in‐season water use between fertilized and unfertilized plots were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1008 · show in text ↑
e1

“WUE of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization significantly enhanced leaf area index.

Treatment
Potassium (K) fertilizatione0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium (K) fertilization significantly enhanced the leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1080 · show in text ↑
e1

“WUE of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–627 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization led to more efficient depletion of soil moisture by roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Potassium (K) fertilizatione0
Outcome
more efficient depletion of soil moisture by rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium (K) fertilization significantly enhanced the leaf area index, resulting in a more efficient depletion of soil moisture by roots in K‐fertilized plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“WUE of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–627 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf-scale water-use efficiency increased due to stomatal adjustment.

Outcome
WUE L eafe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
stomatal adjustmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As a consequence, WUE L eaf was increased due to stomatal adjustment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1240 · show in text ↑
e1

“WUE of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium improved canopy-scale water-use efficiency only by tendency.

Treatment
Potassium (K)e0
Outcome
WUE C anopye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
only by tendencye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium (K) improved WUE C anopy only by tendency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1293 · show in text ↑
e1

“WUE of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–627 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

potassium · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 36 positive, 4 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 97 positive, 12 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

potassium · physiology: water · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.