Paper · 2009 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF FOLIAR FERTILIZATION WITH UREA AND GIBBERELLIC ACID ON SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.).

E. H. H. Selim; M. A. Abdou; H. M. Sarhan; et al.

14
claims
34
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at EL-Serw Agricultural Station Dommiata Governorate North East Delta during the seasons of 2006//2007 and 2007/2008 to study the effect of foliar treatments with urea at concentration of (0,1%,2%) and GA3 at concentration of (0,100,200ppm) on yield and quality of sugar beet cv. Sultany. The important results could be summarized as follows: 1- Foliar application with urea at concentration of 1% and 2% significantly increased root length, TSS% in the first season , also increased root diameter ,root fresh weight and sucrose % in the second season ,root and sugar yields in both seasons. 2-GA3 at 200ppm gave the highest significant results of root length in the first season ,root diameter ,root fresh weight ,purity % in the second season,also increased sucrose %,root and sugar yields in both seasons. 3-Interaction effect between urea foliar solution and GA3 was significant on sucrose %,TSS%, ,root fresh weigh in the second season and insignificant effect on root diameter ,root length,purity% and root and sugar yields in both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea foliar treatment increased root length in the first season.

Material
Sultanyt1
Treatment
urea at concentration of 1% and 2%e0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
first seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application with urea at concentration of 1% and 2% significantly increased root length, TSS% in the first season , also increased root diameter ,root fresh weight and sucrose % in the second season ,root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“sugar beet cv. Sultany”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea foliar treatment increased TSS% in the first season.

Material
Sultanyt1
Treatment
urea at concentration of 1% and 2%e0
Outcome
TSS%e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
first seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application with urea at concentration of 1% and 2% significantly increased root length, TSS% in the first season , also increased root diameter ,root fresh weight and sucrose % in the second season ,root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“sugar beet cv. Sultany”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea foliar treatment increased root diameter in the second season.

Material
Sultanyt1
Treatment
urea at concentration of 1% and 2%e0
Outcome
root diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application with urea at concentration of 1% and 2% significantly increased root length, TSS% in the first season , also increased root diameter ,root fresh weight and sucrose % in the second season ,root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“sugar beet cv. Sultany”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea foliar treatment increased root fresh weight in the second season.

Material
Sultanyt1
Treatment
urea at concentration of 1% and 2%e0
Outcome
root fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application with urea at concentration of 1% and 2% significantly increased root length, TSS% in the first season , also increased root diameter ,root fresh weight and sucrose % in the second season ,root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“sugar beet cv. Sultany”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea foliar treatment increased sucrose % in the second season.

Material
Sultanyt1
Treatment
urea at concentration of 1% and 2%e0
Outcome
sucrose %e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application with urea at concentration of 1% and 2% significantly increased root length, TSS% in the first season , also increased root diameter ,root fresh weight and sucrose % in the second season ,root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“sugar beet cv. Sultany”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea foliar treatment increased root and sugar yields in the both seasons.

Material
Sultanyt1
Treatment
urea at concentration of 1% and 2%e0
Outcome
root and sugar yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application with urea at concentration of 1% and 2% significantly increased root length, TSS% in the first season , also increased root diameter ,root fresh weight and sucrose % in the second season ,root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“sugar beet cv. Sultany”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 200ppm raised root length in the first season.

Treatment
GA3 at 200ppme0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
first seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA3 at 200ppm gave the highest significant results of root length in the first season ,root diameter ,root fresh weight ,purity % in the second season,also increased sucrose %,root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 200ppm raised root diameter in the second season.

Treatment
GA3 at 200ppme0
Outcome
root diametere0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA3 at 200ppm gave the highest significant results of root length in the first season ,root diameter ,root fresh weight ,purity % in the second season,also increased sucrose %,root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 200ppm raised root fresh weight in the second season.

Treatment
GA3 at 200ppme0
Outcome
root fresh weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA3 at 200ppm gave the highest significant results of root length in the first season ,root diameter ,root fresh weight ,purity % in the second season,also increased sucrose %,root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 200ppm raised purity % in the second season.

Treatment
GA3 at 200ppme0
Outcome
purity %e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA3 at 200ppm gave the highest significant results of root length in the first season ,root diameter ,root fresh weight ,purity % in the second season,also increased sucrose %,root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 200ppm raised sucrose % in the both seasons.

Treatment
GA3 at 200ppme0
Outcome
sucrose %e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA3 at 200ppm gave the highest significant results of root length in the first season ,root diameter ,root fresh weight ,purity % in the second season,also increased sucrose %,root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 200ppm raised root and sugar yields in the both seasons.

Treatment
GA3 at 200ppme0
Outcome
root and sugar yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA3 at 200ppm gave the highest significant results of root length in the first season ,root diameter ,root fresh weight ,purity % in the second season,also increased sucrose %,root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The urea–GA3 interaction significantly affected sucrose, TSS and root fresh weight in the second season.

Treatment
urea foliar solution and GA3e0
Outcome
sucrose %,TSS%, ,root fresh weighe0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effect between urea foliar solution and GA3 was significant on sucrose %,TSS%, ,root fresh weigh in the second season and insignificant effect on root diameter ,root length,purity% and root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The urea–GA3 interaction was not significant for root diameter, length, purity or yields.

Treatment
urea foliar solution and GA3e0
Outcome
root diameter ,root length,purity% and root and sugar yieldse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effect between urea foliar solution and GA3 was significant on sucrose %,TSS%, ,root fresh weigh in the second season and insignificant effect on root diameter ,root length,purity% and root and sugar yields in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEEt (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–94 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Gibberellic acid · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 29 positive, 37 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 97 positive, 11 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.