Abstract
The sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L) cultivar “Farida” was grown on a clay soil at Water Management Research Station at El-Karada, Kafrelshiekh, Egypt, in 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 seasons, to determine the effect of three irrigation regimes (at 40, 55, 70% depletion of available soil moisture, DAM), two nitrogen rates (75 and 90 kg N/feddan) and four micronutrients treatments (through seed soaking (SS), foliar spraying (FS), (SS+FS) and control) on growth, yields, quality and water relations. Solution of micronutrients contained 2 g from each of Zn SO4 (26% Zn), Mn SO4 (24% Mn), Fe SO4 (20% Fe) and boric acid per liter. Abundance of the available soil moisture significantly increased dry weight/plant, leaf area index (LAI), root diameter, top yield, crop growth rate (CGR) and water consumptive use (WU). The inverse was true in root/top ratio, root length and concentration of gross sugar in roots. Increasing soil moisture level improved juice purity by decreasing impurities (K, Na and a-amino-N) in roots. The plants irrigated at 55% DAM produced the highest net assimilation rate (NAR) and water efficiency use for roots (WUER) and white sugar (WUES) production compared to those irrigated at 40 or 70% DAM. Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddan significantly increased dry weight, LAI, CGR, root length, root weight, top yield, root yield, concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots, loss sugar%, sugar yield and WU. The inverse was true in root/top ratio, gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %. Nitrogen rate had slightly effect on WUER and WUES. Application of micronutrients through seed soaking and foliar spraying (SS+FS) produced the greatest dry weight, root/top ratio, LAI, CGR, root length, root diameter, root weight, top yield, root yield, gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %, sugar yield, WUER and WUES. SS was at par SS+FS in most these traits. FS increased concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots and the most of mentioned traits compared with control. All interactions had a significant effect on root and white sugar yields/feddan. The maximum root and white sugar yields and the best WUER and WUES were achieved from plants irrigated at 55% DAM and received 90 kg N/feddan along with SS+FS It can be concluded that the irrigation at 55% DAM along with 90 kg N/feddan and SS+FS or SS was the recommended treatment for optimum root and extractable white sugar yield per unit area with less water consumptive use at Kafrelshiekh Governorate.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
More available soil moisture increased dry weight, leaf area and root diameter.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- available soil moisturee0
- Outcome
- dry weight/plant, leaf area index (LAI), root diametere0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Abundance of the available soil moisture significantly increased dry weight/plant, leaf area index (LAI), root diameter, top yield, crop growth rate (CGR) and water consumptive use (WU)”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
More soil moisture increased top yield and crop growth rate.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- available soil moisturee0
- Outcome
- top yield, crop growth rate (CGR)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Abundance of the available soil moisture significantly increased dry weight/plant, leaf area index (LAI), root diameter, top yield, crop growth rate (CGR) and water consumptive use (WU)”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
More soil moisture increased water consumptive use.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- available soil moisturee0
- Outcome
- water consumptive use (WU)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Abundance of the available soil moisture significantly increased dry weight/plant, leaf area index (LAI), root diameter, top yield, crop growth rate (CGR) and water consumptive use (WU)”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
More soil moisture reduced root to top ratio, root length and gross root sugar concentration.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- available soil moisturee1
- Outcome
- root/top ratio, root length and concentration of gross sugar in rootse0
- Direction
- inversee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The inverse was true in root/top ratio, root length and concentration of gross sugar in roots”
t0“Sugar Beet”
e1“Abundance of the available soil moisture significantly increased dry weight/plant, leaf area index (LAI), root diameter, top yield, crop growth rate (CGR) and water consumptive use (WU)”
Claim · model-written summary
More soil moisture improved juice purity by reducing root impurities.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Increasing soil moisture levele0
- Outcome
- juice puritye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing soil moisture level improved juice purity by decreasing impurities (K, Na and a-amino-N) in roots”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
More soil moisture reduced potassium, sodium and amino nitrogen impurities in roots.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Increasing soil moisture levele0
- Outcome
- impurities (K, Na and a-amino-N) in rootse0
- Direction
- decreasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing soil moisture level improved juice purity by decreasing impurities (K, Na and a-amino-N) in roots”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 55% DAM gave the highest net assimilation rate.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- 55% DAMe0
- Outcome
- net assimilation rate (NAR)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- 40 or 70% DAMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The plants irrigated at 55% DAM produced the highest net assimilation rate (NAR) and water efficiency use for roots (WUER) and white sugar (WUES) production compared to those irrigated at 40 or 70% DAM”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 55% DAM gave the highest water use efficiency for roots and white sugar.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- 55% DAMe0
- Outcome
- water efficiency use for roots (WUER) and white sugar (WUES) productione0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- 40 or 70% DAMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The plants irrigated at 55% DAM produced the highest net assimilation rate (NAR) and water efficiency use for roots (WUER) and white sugar (WUES) production compared to those irrigated at 40 or 70% DAM”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher nitrogen increased dry weight, leaf area and crop growth rate.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddane0
- Outcome
- dry weight, LAI, CGRe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddan significantly increased dry weight, LAI, CGR, root length, root weight, top yield, root yield, concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots, loss sugar%, sugar yield and WU”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher nitrogen increased root length and weight, top yield and root yield.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddane0
- Outcome
- root length, root weight, top yield, root yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddan significantly increased dry weight, LAI, CGR, root length, root weight, top yield, root yield, concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots, loss sugar%, sugar yield and WU”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher nitrogen increased root amino nitrogen and sodium plus potassium.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddane0
- Outcome
- concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in rootse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddan significantly increased dry weight, LAI, CGR, root length, root weight, top yield, root yield, concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots, loss sugar%, sugar yield and WU”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher nitrogen increased sugar loss, sugar yield and water use.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddane0
- Outcome
- loss sugar%, sugar yield and WUe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddan significantly increased dry weight, LAI, CGR, root length, root weight, top yield, root yield, concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots, loss sugar%, sugar yield and WU”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher nitrogen reduced root to top ratio, gross and white sugar percentages, and juice purity.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddane1
- Outcome
- root/top ratio, gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %e0
- Direction
- inversee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The inverse was true in root/top ratio, gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %”
t0“Sugar Beet”
e1“Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddan significantly increased dry weight, LAI, CGR, root length, root weight, top yield, root yield, concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots, loss sugar%, sugar yield and WU”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen rate had little effect on water use efficiency for roots or white sugar.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Nitrogen ratee0
- Outcome
- WUER and WUESe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Nitrogen rate had slightly effect on WUER and WUES”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed soaking plus foliar spraying maximized sugar beet growth and yield traits.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- seed soaking and foliar spraying (SS+FS)e0
- Outcome
- dry weight, root/top ratio, LAI, CGR, root length, root diameter, root weight, top yield, root yielde0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application of micronutrients through seed soaking and foliar spraying (SS+FS) produced the greatest dry weight, root/top ratio, LAI, CGR, root length, root diameter, root weight, top yield, root yield, gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %, sugar yield, WUER and WUES”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed soaking plus spraying maximized sugar and water efficiency traits.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- seed soaking and foliar spraying (SS+FS)e0
- Outcome
- gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %, sugar yield, WUER and WUESe0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application of micronutrients through seed soaking and foliar spraying (SS+FS) produced the greatest dry weight, root/top ratio, LAI, CGR, root length, root diameter, root weight, top yield, root yield, gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %, sugar yield, WUER and WUES”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed soaking was comparable with soaking plus spraying for most traits.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- at pare0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- SS+FSe0
Not reportedMaterial
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“SS was at par SS+FS in most these traits”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar spraying increased root impurities and most growth and yield traits relative to control.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- FSe0
- Outcome
- concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in rootse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“FS increased concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots and the most of mentioned traits compared with control”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
All treatment interactions significantly affected root and white sugar yield.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- All interactionse0
- Outcome
- root and white sugar yields/feddane0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“All interactions had a significant effect on root and white sugar yields/feddan”
t0“Sugar Beet”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 55% DAM, 90 kg nitrogen and soaking plus spraying or soaking for optimal sugar yield with less water use.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- irrigation at 55% DAM along with 90 kg N/feddan and SS+FS or SSe0
- Setting
- Kafrelshiekh Governoratee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“irrigation at 55% DAM along with 90 kg N/feddan and SS+FS or SS was the recommended treatment for optimum root and extractable white sugar yield per unit area with less water consumptive use at Kafrelshiekh Governorate”
t0“Sugar Beet”
The same questions in other papers
seed treatment · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →soil water · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
seed treatment · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →application · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →application · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
56 papers more in this group
See all 60 papers →nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →application · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
63 papers more in this group
See all 67 papers →nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
104 papers more in this group
See all 108 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.