Paper · 2011 · Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

Response of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris, L) to Irrigation Regime, Nitrogen Rate and Micronutrients Application

S. Gharib, Hany; EL-Henawy, A.S.

20
claims
42
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L) cultivar “Farida” was grown on a clay soil at Water Management Research Station at El-Karada, Kafrelshiekh, Egypt, in 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 seasons, to determine the effect of three irrigation regimes (at 40, 55, 70% depletion of available soil moisture, DAM), two nitrogen rates (75 and 90 kg N/feddan) and four micronutrients treatments (through seed soaking (SS), foliar spraying (FS), (SS+FS) and control) on growth, yields, quality and water relations. Solution of micronutrients contained 2 g from each of Zn SO4 (26% Zn), Mn SO4 (24% Mn), Fe SO4 (20% Fe) and boric acid per liter. Abundance of the available soil moisture significantly increased dry weight/plant, leaf area index (LAI), root diameter, top yield, crop growth rate (CGR) and water consumptive use (WU). The inverse was true in root/top ratio, root length and concentration of gross sugar in roots. Increasing soil moisture level improved juice purity by decreasing impurities (K, Na and a-amino-N) in roots. The plants irrigated at 55% DAM produced the highest net assimilation rate (NAR) and water efficiency use for roots (WUER) and white sugar (WUES) production compared to those irrigated at 40 or 70% DAM. Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddan significantly increased dry weight, LAI, CGR, root length, root weight, top yield, root yield, concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots, loss sugar%, sugar yield and WU. The inverse was true in root/top ratio, gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %. Nitrogen rate had slightly effect on WUER and WUES. Application of micronutrients through seed soaking and foliar spraying (SS+FS) produced the greatest dry weight, root/top ratio, LAI, CGR, root length, root diameter, root weight, top yield, root yield, gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %, sugar yield, WUER and WUES. SS was at par SS+FS in most these traits. FS increased concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots and the most of mentioned traits compared with control. All interactions had a significant effect on root and white sugar yields/feddan. The maximum root and white sugar yields and the best WUER and WUES were achieved from plants irrigated at 55% DAM and received 90 kg N/feddan along with SS+FS It can be concluded that the irrigation at 55% DAM along with 90 kg N/feddan and SS+FS or SS was the recommended treatment for optimum root and extractable white sugar yield per unit area with less water consumptive use at Kafrelshiekh Governorate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

More available soil moisture increased dry weight, leaf area and root diameter.

Treatment
available soil moisturee0
Outcome
dry weight/plant, leaf area index (LAI), root diametere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Abundance of the available soil moisture significantly increased dry weight/plant, leaf area index (LAI), root diameter, top yield, crop growth rate (CGR) and water consumptive use (WU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

More soil moisture increased top yield and crop growth rate.

Treatment
available soil moisturee0
Outcome
top yield, crop growth rate (CGR)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Abundance of the available soil moisture significantly increased dry weight/plant, leaf area index (LAI), root diameter, top yield, crop growth rate (CGR) and water consumptive use (WU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

More soil moisture increased water consumptive use.

Treatment
available soil moisturee0
Outcome
water consumptive use (WU)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Abundance of the available soil moisture significantly increased dry weight/plant, leaf area index (LAI), root diameter, top yield, crop growth rate (CGR) and water consumptive use (WU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More soil moisture reduced root to top ratio, root length and gross root sugar concentration.

Treatment
available soil moisturee1
Outcome
root/top ratio, root length and concentration of gross sugar in rootse0
Direction
inversee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inverse was true in root/top ratio, root length and concentration of gross sugar in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abundance of the available soil moisture significantly increased dry weight/plant, leaf area index (LAI), root diameter, top yield, crop growth rate (CGR) and water consumptive use (WU)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More soil moisture improved juice purity by reducing root impurities.

Treatment
Increasing soil moisture levele0
Outcome
juice puritye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing soil moisture level improved juice purity by decreasing impurities (K, Na and a-amino-N) in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More soil moisture reduced potassium, sodium and amino nitrogen impurities in roots.

Treatment
Increasing soil moisture levele0
Outcome
impurities (K, Na and a-amino-N) in rootse0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing soil moisture level improved juice purity by decreasing impurities (K, Na and a-amino-N) in roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 55% DAM gave the highest net assimilation rate.

Treatment
55% DAMe0
Outcome
net assimilation rate (NAR)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
40 or 70% DAMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants irrigated at 55% DAM produced the highest net assimilation rate (NAR) and water efficiency use for roots (WUER) and white sugar (WUES) production compared to those irrigated at 40 or 70% DAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 55% DAM gave the highest water use efficiency for roots and white sugar.

Treatment
55% DAMe0
Outcome
water efficiency use for roots (WUER) and white sugar (WUES) productione0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
40 or 70% DAMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants irrigated at 55% DAM produced the highest net assimilation rate (NAR) and water efficiency use for roots (WUER) and white sugar (WUES) production compared to those irrigated at 40 or 70% DAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen increased dry weight, leaf area and crop growth rate.

Treatment
Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddane0
Outcome
dry weight, LAI, CGRe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddan significantly increased dry weight, LAI, CGR, root length, root weight, top yield, root yield, concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots, loss sugar%, sugar yield and WU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen increased root length and weight, top yield and root yield.

Treatment
Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddane0
Outcome
root length, root weight, top yield, root yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddan significantly increased dry weight, LAI, CGR, root length, root weight, top yield, root yield, concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots, loss sugar%, sugar yield and WU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen increased root amino nitrogen and sodium plus potassium.

Treatment
Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddane0
Outcome
concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddan significantly increased dry weight, LAI, CGR, root length, root weight, top yield, root yield, concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots, loss sugar%, sugar yield and WU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen increased sugar loss, sugar yield and water use.

Treatment
Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddane0
Outcome
loss sugar%, sugar yield and WUe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddan significantly increased dry weight, LAI, CGR, root length, root weight, top yield, root yield, concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots, loss sugar%, sugar yield and WU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen reduced root to top ratio, gross and white sugar percentages, and juice purity.

Treatment
Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddane1
Outcome
root/top ratio, gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %e0
Direction
inversee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inverse was true in root/top ratio, gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing nitrogen rate from 75 and 90 kg N/feddan significantly increased dry weight, LAI, CGR, root length, root weight, top yield, root yield, concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots, loss sugar%, sugar yield and WU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate had little effect on water use efficiency for roots or white sugar.

Treatment
Nitrogen ratee0
Outcome
WUER and WUESe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen rate had slightly effect on WUER and WUES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking plus foliar spraying maximized sugar beet growth and yield traits.

Treatment
seed soaking and foliar spraying (SS+FS)e0
Outcome
dry weight, root/top ratio, LAI, CGR, root length, root diameter, root weight, top yield, root yielde0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of micronutrients through seed soaking and foliar spraying (SS+FS) produced the greatest dry weight, root/top ratio, LAI, CGR, root length, root diameter, root weight, top yield, root yield, gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %, sugar yield, WUER and WUES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking plus spraying maximized sugar and water efficiency traits.

Treatment
seed soaking and foliar spraying (SS+FS)e0
Outcome
gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %, sugar yield, WUER and WUESe0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of micronutrients through seed soaking and foliar spraying (SS+FS) produced the greatest dry weight, root/top ratio, LAI, CGR, root length, root diameter, root weight, top yield, root yield, gross sugar%, white sugar % and juice purity %, sugar yield, WUER and WUES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking was comparable with soaking plus spraying for most traits.

Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
SS+FSe0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SS was at par SS+FS in most these traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1867–1907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying increased root impurities and most growth and yield traits relative to control.

Treatment
FSe0
Outcome
concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in rootse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FS increased concentration of a-amino-N% and Na + K in roots and the most of mentioned traits compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1909–2024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatment interactions significantly affected root and white sugar yield.

Treatment
All interactionse0
Outcome
root and white sugar yields/feddane0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All interactions had a significant effect on root and white sugar yields/feddan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2026–2105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 55% DAM, 90 kg nitrogen and soaking plus spraying or soaking for optimal sugar yield with less water use.

Outcome
irrigation at 55% DAM along with 90 kg N/feddan and SS+FS or SSe0
Setting
Kafrelshiekh Governoratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation at 55% DAM along with 90 kg N/feddan and SS+FS or SS was the recommended treatment for optimum root and extractable white sugar yield per unit area with less water consumptive use at Kafrelshiekh Governorate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2295–2513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

soil water · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 37 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

application · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 55 positive, 5 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 29 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 63 positive, 4 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 97 positive, 11 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.