Abstract
Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an agricultural crop with a high sucrose content in the root. Its specific properties make it an essential crop for the sugar processing industry-the response of sugar beet cv. 'Sonja' to different rates of animal manure and foliar application of micronutrients was explored. Animal manure was applied at six rates, whereas micronutrients (Fe, Zn, B, and Mn) were foliar applied at five levels and no micronutrients (control). The evaluated traits included gross sugar percentage, Na, K, and N contents of tubers, alkalinity, sugar extraction coefficient, root yield, pure sugar percentage, and molasses. The results showed that the maximum gross sugar of 18.59% and pure sugar of 16.22% were obtained in plots treated with 40 t ha -1 manure that was subjected to the foliar application of B. Also, foliar application of micronutrients (Mn, Zn, and B) under 40 t ha -1 manure by reducing the amount of Na and amino-N content of the sugar beet roots improved the quantitative and qualitative characteristics. The application of manure enhanced root yield, white sugar yield, and sugar yield by 31, 35, and 38%, respectively, compared to the no-manure treatment. The highest root yield of 63.96 t ha -1 , white sugar yield of 11.24 t ha -1 and sugar yield of 9.28 t ha -1 was obtained from Mn application. The results revealed that the foliar application of micronutrients accompanied by animal manure application could maintain soil fertility and improve the quantitative and qualitative traits of sugar beet.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum gross sugar of 18.59% was obtained in sugar beet plots treated with 40 t/ha manure subjected to foliar boron.
- Taxon
- Sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- 40 t ha -1 manure that was subjected to the foliar application of Be2
- Outcome
- gross sugare2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 18.59%e2
- Setting
- Field-grownt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an agricultural crop with a high sucrose content in the root”
t0“Field-grown Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e2“maximum gross sugar of 18.59% and pure sugar of 16.22% were obtained in plots treated with 40 t ha -1 manure that was subjected to the foliar application of B”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum pure sugar of 16.22% was obtained in sugar beet plots treated with 40 t/ha manure subjected to foliar boron.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- 40 t ha -1 manure that was subjected to the foliar application of Be2
- Outcome
- pure sugare2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 16.22%e2
- Setting
- Field-grownt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an agricultural crop with a high sucrose content in the root”
t0“Field-grown Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e2“maximum gross sugar of 18.59% and pure sugar of 16.22% were obtained in plots treated with 40 t ha -1 manure that was subjected to the foliar application of B”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Mn, Zn and B under 40 t/ha manure reduced the Na and amino-N content of sugar beet roots.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Organ / stage
- sugar beet rootse2
- Treatment
- foliar application of micronutrients (Mn, Zn, and B) under 40 t ha -1 manuree2
- Outcome
- amount of Na and amino-N contente2
- Direction
- reducinge2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an agricultural crop with a high sucrose content in the root”
e2“foliar application of micronutrients (Mn, Zn, and B) under 40 t ha -1 manure by reducing the amount of Na and amino-N content of the sugar beet roots improved the quantitative and qualitative characteristics”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar micronutrients under 40 t/ha manure improved the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- foliar application of micronutrients (Mn, Zn, and B) under 40 t ha -1 manuree2
- Outcome
- quantitative and qualitative characteristicse2
- Direction
- improvede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an agricultural crop with a high sucrose content in the root”
e2“foliar application of micronutrients (Mn, Zn, and B) under 40 t ha -1 manure by reducing the amount of Na and amino-N content of the sugar beet roots improved the quantitative and qualitative characteristics”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure application enhanced root yield by 31% compared with no manure.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- application of manuree2
- Outcome
- root yielde2
- Direction
- enhancede2
- Value
- 31e2
- Comparator
- no-manure treatmente2
- Setting
- Field-grownt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an agricultural crop with a high sucrose content in the root”
t0“Field-grown Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e2“The application of manure enhanced root yield, white sugar yield, and sugar yield by 31, 35, and 38%, respectively, compared to the no-manure treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure application enhanced white sugar yield by 35% compared with no manure.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- application of manuree2
- Outcome
- white sugar yielde2
- Direction
- enhancede2
- Value
- 35e2
- Comparator
- no-manure treatmente2
- Setting
- Field-grownt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an agricultural crop with a high sucrose content in the root”
t0“Field-grown Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e2“The application of manure enhanced root yield, white sugar yield, and sugar yield by 31, 35, and 38%, respectively, compared to the no-manure treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure application enhanced sugar yield by 38% compared with no manure.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- application of manuree2
- Outcome
- sugar yielde2
- Direction
- enhancede2
- Value
- 38%e2
- Comparator
- no-manure treatmente2
- Setting
- Field-grownt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an agricultural crop with a high sucrose content in the root”
t0“Field-grown Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e2“The application of manure enhanced root yield, white sugar yield, and sugar yield by 31, 35, and 38%, respectively, compared to the no-manure treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Mn application gave the highest root yield, 63.96 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- Mn applicatione2
- Outcome
- root yielde2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 63.96 t ha -1e2
- Setting
- Field-grownt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an agricultural crop with a high sucrose content in the root”
t0“Field-grown Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e2“The highest root yield of 63.96 t ha -1 , white sugar yield of 11.24 t ha -1 and sugar yield of 9.28 t ha -1 was obtained from Mn application”
Claim · model-written summary
Mn application gave the highest white sugar yield, 11.24 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- Mn applicatione2
- Outcome
- white sugar yielde2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 11.24 t ha -1e2
- Setting
- Field-grownt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an agricultural crop with a high sucrose content in the root”
t0“Field-grown Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e2“The highest root yield of 63.96 t ha -1 , white sugar yield of 11.24 t ha -1 and sugar yield of 9.28 t ha -1 was obtained from Mn application”
Claim · model-written summary
Mn application gave the highest sugar yield, 9.28 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- Mn applicatione2
- Outcome
- sugar yielde2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 9.28 t ha -1e2
- Setting
- Field-grownt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an agricultural crop with a high sucrose content in the root”
t0“Field-grown Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e2“The highest root yield of 63.96 t ha -1 , white sugar yield of 11.24 t ha -1 and sugar yield of 9.28 t ha -1 was obtained from Mn application”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar micronutrients with animal manure could maintain soil fertility and improve sugar beet quantitative and qualitative traits (authors' conclusion).
- Taxon
- Sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- foliar application of micronutrients accompanied by animal manure applicatione3
- Outcome
- soil fertilitye3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is an agricultural crop with a high sucrose content in the root”
e3“foliar application of micronutrients accompanied by animal manure application could maintain soil fertility and improve the quantitative and qualitative traits of sugar beet”
The same questions in other papers
manganese atom · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
manganese atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →manganese atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →application · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
263 papers more in this group
See all 267 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.