Paper · 1973 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrate Accumulation in Table Beets and Spinach as Affected by Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Nutrition and Light Intensity1

D. J. Cantliffe

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
70
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this research was to determine the effects of varying levels of N, P, and K fertilizer and light intensity on nitrate accumulation in species grown for human consumption. In greenhouse experiments, table beets ( Beta vulgaris L.) and spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) were grown in fine sandy loam soil at three levels of N, P, and K fertilizer in a 3 3 factorial design. Plants were grown under two light intensities, 1.08 ✕ 10 4 lux or 3.23 ✕ 10 4 lux. Nitrate, total N, P, and K were determined on freeze dried table beet leaf blades and roots and on spinach leaves. Fertilizer N had the greatest influence on NO 3 accumulation in all three tissues studied. Varying the rate of fertilizer P had no effect on NO 3 accumulation. Plants of both species grown with the highest rate of K and under the lower light intensity accumulated significantly more NO 3 ‐N than other plants receiving less K. Table beet leaf blades contained three times more NO 3 than roots. Lowering the light intensity from 3.23 to 1.08 ✕ 10 4 resulted in a significant increase in NO 3 ‐N in all tissues tested. Total N concentration increased in all tissues with an addition of N fertilizer or by a reduction in light intensity. In spinach, total N was lower in plants receiving K fertilizer. P and K were lower in beet and spinach leaves that received N fertilizer. Light intensity had no influence on P concentration, while all tissues grown at 1.08 ✕ 10 4 lux contained more K than tissue grown at 3.23 ✕ 10 4 lux. Any factor which increased the total N concentration of the tissue resulted in a corresponding increment in the NO 3 concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N had the greatest influence on nitrate accumulation in all three tissues studied.

Treatment
Fertilizer Ne1
Outcome
NO 3 accumulatione1
Direction
greatest influencee1
Qualifier
in all three tissues studiede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiments, table beets ( Beta vulgaris L.) and spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) were grown in fine sandy loam soil at three levels of N, P, and K fertilizer in a 3 3 factorial design”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilizer N had the greatest influence on NO 3 accumulation in all three tissues studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varying the rate of fertilizer P had no effect on nitrate accumulation.

Treatment
rate of fertilizer Pe2
Outcome
NO 3 accumulatione2
Direction
no effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiments, table beets ( Beta vulgaris L.) and spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) were grown in fine sandy loam soil at three levels of N, P, and K fertilizer in a 3 3 factorial design”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–394 · show in text ↑
e2

“Varying the rate of fertilizer P had no effect on NO 3 accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest K with lower light significantly increased NO 3 ‐N compared with plants receiving less K.

Treatment
highest rate of K and under the lower light intensitye3
Outcome
NO 3 ‐Ne3
Direction
moree3
Comparator
other plants receiving less Ke3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiments, table beets ( Beta vulgaris L.) and spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) were grown in fine sandy loam soil at three levels of N, P, and K fertilizer in a 3 3 factorial design”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–394 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plants of both species grown with the highest rate of K and under the lower light intensity accumulated significantly more NO 3 ‐N than other plants receiving less K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–919 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Table beet leaf blades contained three times more NO 3 than roots.

Organ / stage
leaf bladese4
Outcome
NO 3e4
Direction
moree4
Value
three timese4
Comparator
rootse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Table beet leaf blades contained three times more NO 3 than roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowering light intensity from 3.23 to 1.08 ✕ 10 4 significantly increased NO 3 ‐N in all tissues tested.

Treatment
Lowering the light intensity from 3.23 to 1.08 ✕ 10 4e5
Outcome
NO 3 ‐Ne5
Direction
increasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiments, table beets ( Beta vulgaris L.) and spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) were grown in fine sandy loam soil at three levels of N, P, and K fertilizer in a 3 3 factorial design”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–394 · show in text ↑
e5

“Lowering the light intensity from 3.23 to 1.08 ✕ 10 4 resulted in a significant increase in NO 3 ‐N in all tissues tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding N fertilizer increased total N concentration in all tissues.

Treatment
an addition of N fertilizere6
Outcome
Total N concentratione6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiments, table beets ( Beta vulgaris L.) and spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) were grown in fine sandy loam soil at three levels of N, P, and K fertilizer in a 3 3 factorial design”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–394 · show in text ↑
e6

“Total N concentration increased in all tissues with an addition of N fertilizer or by a reduction in light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1227 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Any factor that raised total N concentration raised nitrate concentration correspondingly.

Treatment
Any factor which increased the total N concentration of the tissuee1
Outcome
NO 3 concentratione1
Direction
incremente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiments, table beets ( Beta vulgaris L.) and spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) were grown in fine sandy loam soil at three levels of N, P, and K fertilizer in a 3 3 factorial design”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“Any factor which increased the total N concentration of the tissue resulted in a corresponding increment in the NO 3 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In spinach, total N was lower in plants receiving K fertilizer.

Treatment
K fertilizere7
Outcome
total Ne7
Direction
lowere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“In spinach, total N was lower in plants receiving K fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer lowered P and K in beet and spinach leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
N fertilizere1
Outcome
P and Ke1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“P and K were lower in beet and spinach leaves that received N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity had no influence on P concentration.

Treatment
light intensitye1
Outcome
P concentratione1
Direction
no influencee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiments, table beets ( Beta vulgaris L.) and spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) were grown in fine sandy loam soil at three levels of N, P, and K fertilizer in a 3 3 factorial design”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“Light intensity had no influence on P concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissues grown at 1.08 ✕ 10 4 lux contained more K than tissues grown at 3.23 ✕ 10 4 lux.

Treatment
1.08 ✕ 10 4 luxe1
Outcome
Ke1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
3.23 ✕ 10 4 luxe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiments, table beets ( Beta vulgaris L.) and spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) were grown in fine sandy loam soil at three levels of N, P, and K fertilizer in a 3 3 factorial design”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“all tissues grown at 1.08 ✕ 10 4 lux contained more K than tissue grown at 3.23 ✕ 10 4 lux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1516 · show in text ↑

light · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 45 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.