Paper · 2025 · Egyptian Journal of Phytopathology

Agricultural Operations as Root- knot Nematode Pest Management Strategy on Sugarbeet. 2- Utilizing Different Rates of Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizers in Semi-Arid Land

Mohamed F. Maareg; Abeer Salah Yassin; Hossam M. El-Sharnoby; et al.

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate the impact of different rates of nitrogen (0, 60, 90, and 120 kg/fed.) and potassium (0, 36, 48, and 60 Kg K₂O/fed.) fertilizers on the reproduction of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne javanica, and the quantitative and qualitative characters of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris, cv. Francescan). The findings demonstrated that increasing nitrogen and potassium rates progressively and significantly reduced nematode final population (juveniles in soil and all developmental stages within roots) as well as its reproduction factor. Conversely, high rates of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers significantly (P<0.05) enhanced all measured quantitative characters (including roots, top, raw sugar, and returned sugar yields) and most qualitative characters (such as raw sucrose content, returned sugar content, quality index, and loss sugar yield/fed) showed significant improvement, whereas the percentage of sugar lost in molasses was notably reduced. It could be calculated that the combination of ammonium nitrate at 120 kg N and potassium sulphate at 60 kg K2O per/ fed proved to be the most effective in suppressing nematode reproduction while boosting sugar beet productivity. This approach presents a novel strategy for managing root-knot nematode (M. javanica) in agricultural fields through the integrated application of essential nutrients.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen and potassium rates significantly reduced nematode final population in soil and roots.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen and potassium ratese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae2pathogen
Outcome
nematode final population (juveniles in soil and all developmental stages within roots)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing nitrogen and potassium rates progressively and significantly reduced nematode final population (juveniles in soil and all developmental stages within roots)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–522 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris, cv. Francescan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen and potassium rates significantly reduced the nematode reproduction factor.

Treatment
increasing nitrogen and potassium ratese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae2pathogen
Outcome
reproduction factore0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing nitrogen and potassium rates progressively and significantly reduced nematode final population (juveniles in soil and all developmental stages within roots) as well as its reproduction factor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris, cv. Francescan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen and potassium fertilizer rates significantly increased root, top, raw sugar and returned sugar yields.

Treatment
high rates of nitrogen and potassium fertilizerse0
Outcome
roots, top, raw sugar, and returned sugar yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high rates of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers significantly (P<0.05) enhanced all measured quantitative characters (including roots, top, raw sugar, and returned sugar yields)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–749 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris, cv. Francescan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High fertilizer rates significantly improved raw sucrose content, returned sugar content and quality index.

Treatment
high rates of nitrogen and potassium fertilizerse2
Outcome
raw sucrose content, returned sugar content, quality indexe0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most qualitative characters (such as raw sucrose content, returned sugar content, quality index, and loss sugar yield/fed) showed significant improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–907 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris, cv. Francescan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“high rates of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High fertilizer rates significantly improved loss sugar yield per feddan.

Treatment
high rates of nitrogen and potassium fertilizerse2
Outcome
loss sugar yield/fede0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“loss sugar yield/fed) showed significant improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–907 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris, cv. Francescan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“high rates of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High fertilizer rates reduced the percentage of sugar lost in molasses.

Treatment
high rates of nitrogen and potassium fertilizerse2
Outcome
percentage of sugar lost in molassese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of sugar lost in molasses was notably reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris, cv. Francescan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“high rates of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 120 kg N and 60 kg K2O per feddan treatment was most effective at suppressing nematode reproduction.

Treatment
combination of ammonium nitrate at 120 kg N and potassium sulphate at 60 kg K2O per/ fede0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae2pathogen
Outcome
nematode reproductione0
Direction
suppressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of ammonium nitrate at 120 kg N and potassium sulphate at 60 kg K2O per/ fed proved to be the most effective in suppressing nematode reproduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1168 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris, cv. Francescan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 120 kg N and 60 kg K2O per feddan treatment was most effective at boosting sugar beet productivity.

Treatment
combination of ammonium nitrate at 120 kg N and potassium sulphate at 60 kg K2O per/ fede0
Outcome
sugar beet productivitye0
Direction
boostinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of ammonium nitrate at 120 kg N and potassium sulphate at 60 kg K2O per/ fed proved to be the most effective in suppressing nematode reproduction while boosting sugar beet productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1208 · show in text ↑

potassium sulfate · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ammonium nitrate · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

potassium · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

58 papers: 52 positive, 6 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 29 positive, 37 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 45 positive, 23 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.