Paper · 1961 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

The effect of sodium and potassium fertilizer on the mineral composition of sugar beet

S. N. Adams

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plants from salt and potash fertilizer trials at Bothamsted were harvested at intervals throughout the growing seasons of 1942 and 1943 and analysed for N, K, Na, Ca, Mg and Mn. The uptake of nutrients is discussed with respect to field methods of fertilizer application. Salt increased beet yield in both years, but it did not act by mobilizing soil potassium reserves and increasing the potassium status of the plant. Potash fertilizer, although increasing the potassium status of the plant, did not increase yield. Sodium and potassium were differently distributed in the plant. At harvest, only 6% of the plant's sodium content was in the root compared with 33% of the potassium. The potassium, but not the sodium content of the petiole, was higher than that of the lamina until the end of August. Sodium thus is a nutrient for beet and not a potassium substitute.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt raised beet yield in both years.

Treatment
Salte0
Outcome
beet yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt increased beet yield in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt did not mobilize soil potassium or increase plant potassium status.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
Salte0
Outcome
potassium statuse0
Direction
did note0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Salt increased beet yield in both years, but it did not act by mobilizing soil potassium reserves and increasing the potassium status of the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash fertilizer increased plant potassium status.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
Potash fertilizere0
Outcome
potassium statuse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Potash fertilizer, although increasing the potassium status of the plant, did not increase yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash fertilizer did not increase yield.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
Potash fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Potash fertilizer, although increasing the potassium status of the plant, did not increase yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–517 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest 6% of plant sodium was in the root.

Taxon
plante0
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
plant's sodium contente0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
potassiume0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest, only 6% of the plant's sodium content was in the root compared with 33% of the potassium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–683 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest 33% of plant potassium was in the root.

Taxon
plante0
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
potassiume0
Value
33%e0
Comparator
sodiume0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest, only 6% of the plant's sodium content was in the root compared with 33% of the potassium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–683 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petiole potassium exceeded lamina potassium until late August.

Taxon
plante0
Organ / stage
petiolee0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
laminae0

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium and potassium were differently distributed in the plant. At harvest, only 6% of the plant's sodium content was in the root compared with 33% of the potassium. The potassium, but not the sodium content of the petiole, was higher than that of the lamina until the end of August.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–801 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petiole sodium did not exceed lamina sodium until late August.

Taxon
plante0
Organ / stage
petiolee0
Outcome
sodium contente0
Comparator
laminae0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium and potassium were differently distributed in the plant. At harvest, only 6% of the plant's sodium content was in the root compared with 33% of the potassium. The potassium, but not the sodium content of the petiole, was higher than that of the lamina until the end of August.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–801 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude sodium is a beet nutrient rather than a potassium substitute.

Compound
Sodiume0
Outcome
a nutriente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodium thus is a nutrient for beet and not a potassium substitute.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–868 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

58 papers: 52 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 1 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

salinity · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 4 positive, 13 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 46 positive, 13 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 237 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 237 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.