Paper · 2017 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Efficient Utilization of Nitrogen by Sugar Beet Irrigated with Saline Water under Fertilizer Rates and Water Regime Using 15N Tracer Technique

E. El-Hadidi; H. Abdel Aziz; M. Enab

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted in green-house of Soil and Water Research Department, NuclearResearchCenter, Abou-Zaabal, Egypt in winter 2016. Nitrogen fertilization management and irrigation water regime were as field practices were followed to improve sugar beet production under salinity stress condition. Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water at 100%, 80% and 60% water regimes. Plants were fertilized with 100%, 80% and 50% of fertilizer-N recommended rates. Shoot dry weight was not significantly affected by experimental factors while root dry weight significantly but negatively affected by reduction in water quantities and raise of water salinity. On the other hand, dry weight of root of plants treated with N50 was superior over other N rats especially under W80 and W60 water regimes. Nitrogen uptake by shoot and roots was variably significantly affected by water and N fertilizer regimes under different water salinity levels. Based on mean averages of water and nitrogen treatments, W100, N80 and N100 interacted with salinity levels were the best treatments. Generally, N uptake was negatively affected by shortage in water requirement (regime). The highest values of N uptake by shoots of plants irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 salinity levels were recorded with application of 50% N recommended rate. N80 and N100 interacted with salinity levels resulted in the best N uptake by root under W100, W80 and W60, respectively. Nitrogen derived from fertilizer (Ndff) by shoot tended to be reduced with irrigation water shortage up to W60 (water scarce). On the other hand, in most cases, Ndff values were increased with irrigation water salinity levels. It means that sugar beet as salinity tolerant plant acted well and able to gain more nitrogen from chemical fertilizer. More Ndff by shoot was gained when plants fertilized with either N80 or N50 rates. Ndff by root was negatively affected by shortage of water requirement and declined with increasing water salinity but enhanced with low rate of chemical fertilizer added especially at W100 regime. Interaction of salinity and nitrogen rates (S x N) resulted in the increase of %NUE with S8 and S16 salinity levels comparing to fresh water (FW) treatment. This was true, but in low extent, with W80 and W60 water regimes. The highest %NUE by root was recorded with N50 interacted with FW under W100 regime. It means that low N rates meet the plant demand without risk on production and achieved the most benefits from the added doses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight was not significantly affected by the experimental factors.

Treatment
experimental factorse1
Outcome
Shoot dry weighte1
Direction
not significantly affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoot dry weight was not significantly affected by experimental factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduction in water quantities significantly but negatively affected root dry weight.

Treatment
reduction in water quantitiese1
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
negatively affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“root dry weight significantly but negatively affected by reduction in water quantities and raise of water salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising water salinity significantly but negatively affected root dry weight.

Treatment
raise of water salinitye1
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
negatively affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“root dry weight significantly but negatively affected by reduction in water quantities and raise of water salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight of plants treated with N50 was superior to other N rates, especially under W80 and W60 water regimes.

Organ / stage
roote1
Treatment
N50e1
Outcome
dry weight of roote1
Direction
superiore1
Qualifier
especially under W80 and W60 water regimese1
Comparator
other N ratse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry weight of root of plants treated with N50 was superior over other N rats especially under W80 and W60 water regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake by shoot and roots was variably and significantly affected by water and N fertilizer regimes under different salinity levels.

Treatment
water and N fertilizer regimese1
Outcome
Nitrogen uptake by shoot and rootse1
Qualifier
under different water salinity levelse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen uptake by shoot and roots was variably significantly affected by water and N fertilizer regimes under different water salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The water and nitrogen treatments W100, N80 and N100 interacted with salinity levels were the best treatments.

Treatment
W100, N80 and N100 interacted with salinity levelse1
Outcome
treatmentse1
Direction
the beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Based on mean averages of water and nitrogen treatments, W100, N80 and N100 interacted with salinity levels were the best treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Generally, N uptake was negatively affected by shortage in water requirement.

Treatment
shortage in water requiremente1
Outcome
N uptakee1
Direction
negatively affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Generally, N uptake was negatively affected by shortage in water requirement (regime)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest N uptake by shoots under 8 and 16 dS m-1 salinity was recorded with 50% N recommended rate.

Organ / stage
shootse1
Treatment
application of 50% N recommended ratee1
Outcome
N uptake by shootse1
Direction
highest valuese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest values of N uptake by shoots of plants irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 salinity levels were recorded with application of 50% N recommended rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N80 and N100 interacted with salinity levels gave the best N uptake by root under W100, W80 and W60, respectively.

Organ / stage
roote1
Treatment
N80 and N100 interacted with salinity levelse1
Outcome
N uptake by roote1
Direction
beste1
Qualifier
under W100, W80 and W60, respectivelye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“N80 and N100 interacted with salinity levels resulted in the best N uptake by root under W100, W80 and W60, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ndff by shoot tended to be reduced by irrigation water shortage up to W60.

Treatment
irrigation water shortagee1
Outcome
Nitrogen derived from fertilizer (Ndff) by shoote1
Direction
tended to be reducede1
Qualifier
up to W60 (water scarce)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen derived from fertilizer (Ndff) by shoot tended to be reduced with irrigation water shortage up to W60 (water scarce)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ndff values were increased with irrigation water salinity levels in most cases.

Treatment
irrigation water salinity levelse1
Outcome
Ndff valuese1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in most casese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“in most cases, Ndff values were increased with irrigation water salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More Ndff by shoot was gained when plants were fertilized with either N80 or N50 rates.

Treatment
fertilized with either N80 or N50 ratese1
Outcome
Ndff by shoote1
Direction
Moree1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“More Ndff by shoot was gained when plants fertilized with either N80 or N50 rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–1898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ndff by root was negatively affected by shortage of water requirement.

Treatment
shortage of water requiremente1
Outcome
Ndff by roote1
Direction
negatively affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ndff by root was negatively affected by shortage of water requirement and declined with increasing water salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–2013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ndff by root declined with increasing water salinity.

Treatment
increasing water salinitye1
Outcome
Ndff by roote1
Direction
declinede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ndff by root was negatively affected by shortage of water requirement and declined with increasing water salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–2013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low rate of chemical fertilizer enhanced Ndff by root, especially at the W100 regime.

Treatment
low rate of chemical fertilizere1
Outcome
Ndff by roote1
Direction
enhancede1
Qualifier
especially at W100 regimee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ndff by root was negatively affected by shortage of water requirement and declined with increasing water salinity but enhanced with low rate of chemical fertilizer added especially at W100 regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–2095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of salinity and N rates (S x N) increased %NUE at S8 and S16 salinity levels compared with fresh water.

Treatment
Interaction of salinity and nitrogen rates (S x N)e1
Outcome
%NUEe1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
with S8 and S16 salinity levelse1
Comparator
fresh water (FW) treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Interaction of salinity and nitrogen rates (S x N) resulted in the increase of %NUE with S8 and S16 salinity levels comparing to fresh water (FW) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2097–2252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The S x N interaction increase in %NUE was true, but to a low extent, under W80 and W60 water regimes.

Treatment
Interaction of salinity and nitrogen rates (S x N)e1
Outcome
%NUEe1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
in low extent, with W80 and W60 water regimese1
Comparator
fresh water (FW) treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“Interaction of salinity and nitrogen rates (S x N) resulted in the increase of %NUE with S8 and S16 salinity levels comparing to fresh water (FW) treatment. This was true, but in low extent, with W80 and W60 water regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2097–2318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest %NUE by root was recorded with N50 interacted with fresh water under W100 regime.

Organ / stage
roote1
Treatment
N50 interacted with FWe1
Outcome
%NUE by roote1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
under W100 regimee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest %NUE by root was recorded with N50 interacted with FW under W100 regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2320–2403 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend low N rates, which meet the plant demand without risk on production.

Outcome
low N ratese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet plants were irrigated with 8 and 16 dS m-1 saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–375 · show in text ↑
e1

“It means that low N rates meet the plant demand without risk on production and achieved the most benefits from the added doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2405–2531 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

54 papers: 13 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 1 positive, 10 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.