Paper · 2022 · SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics

RESPONSE OF SUGAR BEET TO SANDY SOIL AMENDED BY ZEOLITE AND POTASSIUM SULFATE FERTILIZATION

H.E.A. NEMEATA ALLA; S.A.M. HELMY

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out on a private farm at Wadi El-Natrun (latitude of 30.48° N and longitude of 30.50° E), Beheira Governorate, Egypt, in the 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 seasons, to find out the effect of adding zeolite as a soil conditioner and potassium fertilizer on growth, yield, and quality of sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris L. var. saccharifera) grown in sandy soil conditions. The present work included 12 treatments, which were the combinations of four zeolite levels (Zero, 476, 952, and 1,428 kg ha-1), and three levels of potassium in the form of potassium sulfate (119, 178.5, and 238 kg K2SO4 ha-1), which were added as a soil application. The treatments were arranged in a complete block design in a split plot with four replications. The results showed that higher values of the photosynthetic pigments, root diameter, fresh and foliage weights plant-1, as well as, sucrose and extracted sugar percentages, quality index, yields of the root, top, and sugar ha-1, were obtained by adding 1,428 kg zeolite, compared with the other levels of zeolite, in both seasons. However, sodium, alpha-amino N contents in the root, and sugar lost to molasses% were insignificantly affected by zeolite rates in both seasons. Application of 238 kg K2SO4 ha-1 significantly resulted in the highest values of photosynthetic pigments, root dimensions, sucrose%, and root potassium content. In addition, extracted sugar %, quality index, root, top, and sugar yields ha-1 were increased compared with the other lower K-sulphate levels in both seasons. On the contrary, sugar lost to molasses% was insignificantly affected by applied potassium sulfate in both seasons. The maximum values of root diameter, fresh weight, yields of root and top ha-1 in both seasons, and also sugar yield in the second season were produced from the interaction between applying 1,428 kg zeolite and 238 kg potassium sulfate ha1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest zeolite rate produced higher photosynthetic pigments, root traits, sugar content, quality and yields.

Treatment
1,428 kg zeolitee0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments, root diameter, fresh and foliage weights plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0
Comparator
other levels of zeolitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher values of the photosynthetic pigments, root diameter, fresh and foliage weights plant-1, as well as, sucrose and extracted sugar percentages, quality index, yields of the root, top, and sugar ha-1, were obtained by adding 1,428 kg zeolite, compared with the other levels of zeolite, in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeolite rates did not significantly change root sodium, alpha-amino N, or sugar lost to molasses.

Treatment
zeolite ratese0
Outcome
sodium, alpha-amino N contents in the root, and sugar lost to molasses%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium, alpha-amino N contents in the root, and sugar lost to molasses% were insignificantly affected by zeolite rates in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest potassium sulfate rate increased photosynthetic pigments, root dimensions, sucrose and root potassium.

Treatment
238 kg K2SO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments, root dimensions, sucrose%, and root potassium contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 238 kg K2SO4 ha-1 significantly resulted in the highest values of photosynthetic pigments, root dimensions, sucrose%, and root potassium content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest potassium sulfate rate increased extracted sugar, quality index and root, top and sugar yields.

Treatment
238 kg K2SO4 ha-1e1
Outcome
extracted sugar %, quality index, root, top, and sugar yields ha-1e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other lower K-sulphate levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extracted sugar %, quality index, root, top, and sugar yields ha-1 were increased compared with the other lower K-sulphate levels in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1559 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 238 kg K2SO4 ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium sulfate did not significantly affect sugar lost to molasses.

Treatment
potassium sulfatee0
Outcome
sugar lost to molasses%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar lost to molasses% was insignificantly affected by applied potassium sulfate in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1675 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined highest zeolite and potassium sulfate rates maximized root diameter, fresh weight and root and top yields.

Treatment
1,428 kg zeolite and 238 kg potassium sulfate ha1e0
Outcome
root diameter, fresh weight, yields of root and top ha-1e0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum values of root diameter, fresh weight, yields of root and top ha-1 in both seasons, and also sugar yield in the second season were produced from the interaction between applying 1,428 kg zeolite and 238 kg potassium sulfate ha1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1916 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined rates maximized sugar yield in the second season.

Treatment
1,428 kg zeolite and 238 kg potassium sulfate ha1e0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum values of root diameter, fresh weight, yields of root and top ha-1 in both seasons, and also sugar yield in the second season were produced from the interaction between applying 1,428 kg zeolite and 238 kg potassium sulfate ha1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1916 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 · show in text ↑

potassium sulfate · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium sulfate · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

other · physiology: photosynthesis · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

other · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

other · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.