Paper · 2022 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Promote sugar beet cultivation in saline soil by applying humic substances in-soil and mineral nitrogen fertilization

Ibrahim S. M. Mosaad; Ayman H. I. Serag; Mohamed H. Sheta

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), accounting for 30 percent of the total world sugar production, maybe affected by soil fertility and nutrition supply in terms of both its yield and quality. Humic substances have a direct and indirect effect on plants, is it possible to raise this effect by integrate it with mineral nitrogen fertilization in saline soils? Two field experiments were conducted during two seasons. The treatments in split-plot design included without humic substances, soil-addition of humic acid and soil-addition of fulvic acid as main plots and 71, 142 and 213 kg N ha−1 as subplots. Soil-additions of humic substances increased root length, top and root content of α-N and K, the concentration of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recovery and yield of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recovery but reduced root content of Na and sugar quality index percentage. Increasing nitrogen fertilization level from 71 to 213 kg N ha−1 significantly increased all traits, except sucrose, sugar recovery and sugar quality index percentage. The highest root yield values were with soil-addition of humic acid with 213 kg N ha−1. On the other hand, the soil-addition of humic acid and fulvic acid with 213 kg N ha−1 increased the recoverable sugar yield of sugar beet by 16.1 and 15.2%, respectively. Therefore, it is preferable to use soil-addition of humic acid at 30 kg ha−1 with 213 kg N ha−1 to obtain the highest yield from the root yield and the extracted sugar yield, especially in saline soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-additions of humic substances increased sugar beet root length compared with no humic substances.

Treatment
Soil-additions of humic substancese1
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
without humic substancese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil-additions of humic substances increased root length, top and root content of α-N and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments in split-plot design included without humic substances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-additions of humic substances increased the top and root content of alpha-N and K in sugar beet.

Organ / stage
top and roote1
Treatment
Soil-additions of humic substancese1
Outcome
content of α-N and Ke1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
without humic substancese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil-additions of humic substances increased root length, top and root content of α-N and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments in split-plot design included without humic substances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-additions of humic substances increased the concentration of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recovery in sugar beet.

Treatment
Soil-additions of humic substancese3
Outcome
the concentration of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recoverye3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
without humic substancese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e3

“Soil-additions of humic substances increased root length, top and root content of α-N and K, the concentration of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–753 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments in split-plot design included without humic substances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-additions of humic substances increased the yield of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recovery in sugar beet.

Treatment
Soil-additions of humic substancese4
Outcome
yield of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recoverye4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
without humic substancese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e4

“Soil-additions of humic substances increased root length, top and root content of α-N and K, the concentration of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recovery and yield of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–805 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments in split-plot design included without humic substances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-additions of humic substances reduced the root content of Na in sugar beet grown in saline soil.

Organ / stage
roote5
Treatment
Soil-additions of humic substancese5
Outcome
root content of Nae5
Direction
reducede5
Comparator
without humic substancese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e5

“Soil-additions of humic substances increased root length, top and root content of α-N and K, the concentration of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recovery and yield of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recovery but reduced root content of Na and sugar quality index percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–871 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments in split-plot design included without humic substances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-additions of humic substances reduced the sugar quality index percentage of sugar beet.

Treatment
Soil-additions of humic substancese5
Outcome
sugar quality index percentagee5
Direction
reducede5
Comparator
without humic substancese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e5

“Soil-additions of humic substances increased root length, top and root content of α-N and K, the concentration of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recovery and yield of sucrose, sugar loss and sugar recovery but reduced root content of Na and sugar quality index percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–871 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatments in split-plot design included without humic substances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilization from 71 to 213 kg N ha−1 significantly increased sugar beet traits, except sucrose, sugar recovery and sugar quality index percentage.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione6
Outcome
all traitse6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
except sucrose, sugar recovery and sugar quality index percentagee6
Comparator
from 71e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e6

“Increasing nitrogen fertilization level from 71 to 213 kg N ha−1 significantly increased all traits, except sucrose, sugar recovery and sugar quality index percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-addition of humic acid with 213 kg N ha−1 gave the highest sugar beet root yield values.

Treatment
soil-addition of humic acid with 213 kg N ha−1e7
Outcome
root yield valuese7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e7

“The highest root yield values were with soil-addition of humic acid with 213 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1127 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-addition of humic acid at 30 kg ha−1 with 213 kg N ha−1 is preferable for the highest root and extracted sugar yield in saline soils.

Treatment
soil-addition of humic acid at 30 kg ha−1 with 213 kg N ha−1e1
Outcome
root yield and the extracted sugar yielde1
Setting
saline soilse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“Therefore, it is preferable to use soil-addition of humic acid at 30 kg ha−1 with 213 kg N ha−1 to obtain the highest yield from the root yield and the extracted sugar yield, especially in saline soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-addition of humic acid with 213 kg N ha−1 increased sugar beet recoverable sugar yield by 16.1%.

Treatment
soil-addition of humic acide1
Outcome
recoverable sugar yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
16.1e1
Qualifier
with 213 kg N ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the soil-addition of humic acid and fulvic acid with 213 kg N ha−1 increased the recoverable sugar yield of sugar beet by 16.1 and 15.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvic acid with 213 kg N ha−1 increased sugar beet recoverable sugar yield by 15.2%.

Treatment
fulvic acide1
Outcome
recoverable sugar yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
15.2e1
Qualifier
with 213 kg N ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the soil-addition of humic acid and fulvic acid with 213 kg N ha−1 increased the recoverable sugar yield of sugar beet by 16.1 and 15.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1298 · show in text ↑

other · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

other · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

other · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

other · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

other · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.