Paper · 2020 · Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research

Effect of Humic Acid Application on Qualitative Parameters of Sugar Beet Cv.Shirin

Amir Rahimi; Shirin Rahimi; Mustafa Kiralan; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present experiment aimed to investigate the influence of humic acid application on qualitative traits of sugar beet cv. 'Shirin' basis of a randomized complete block design with four replications during 2007-2008. The plants were treated with different humic acid treatments (control, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 kg ha -1 ). The sugar and non-sugar components such as potassium, sodium, amino-nitrogen and some qualitative parameters for sugar processing such as alkalinity of juice , root yield, sugar percent, recoverable sugar, and sugar content in molasses were determined according to the standard methods. According to the results, humic acid application enhanced sugar quality of sugar beet. The lowest value for K, Na and amino-nitrogen was observed in H300 treatment (300 kg ha -1 ) with 3.85 meq 100 g -1 pulp, 1.22 meq 100 g -1 pulp and 1.21 meq 100 g -1 pulp, respectively. The highest recoverable sugar content (15.64%) was obtained from 500 kg ha -1 application. Also, the highest sugar yield (18.41%) and the lowest sugar content in molasses (2.14%) were observed in the treatments of 400 kg ha -1 and 300 kg ha -1 humic acid, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid application enhanced the sugar quality of sugar beet compared with the control.

Treatment
humic acid applicatione1
Outcome
sugar qualitye1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants were treated with different humic acid treatments (control, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–327 · show in text ↑
e1

“humic acid application enhanced sugar quality of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–701 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugar beet cv. 'Shirin'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 500 kg/ha humic acid rate gave the highest recoverable sugar content in sugar beet, 15.64%.

Treatment
500 kg ha -1 applicatione3
Outcome
recoverable sugar contente3
Direction
higheste3
Value
15.64%e3
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants were treated with different humic acid treatments (control, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–327 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugar beet cv. 'Shirin'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–132 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest recoverable sugar content (15.64%) was obtained from 500 kg ha -1 application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 400 kg/ha humic acid rate gave the highest sugar yield in sugar beet, 18.41%.

Treatment
400 kg ha -1e4
Outcome
sugar yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
18.41%e4
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants were treated with different humic acid treatments (control, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–327 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugar beet cv. 'Shirin'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–132 · show in text ↑
e4

“the highest sugar yield (18.41%) and the lowest sugar content in molasses (2.14%) were observed in the treatments of 400 kg ha -1 and 300 kg ha -1 humic acid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 300 kg/ha humic acid treatment gave the lowest sugar content in molasses of sugar beet, 2.14%.

Treatment
300 kg ha -1 humic acide4
Outcome
sugar content in molassese4
Direction
loweste4
Value
2.14%e4
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants were treated with different humic acid treatments (control, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 kg ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–327 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugar beet cv. 'Shirin'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–132 · show in text ↑
e4

“the highest sugar yield (18.41%) and the lowest sugar content in molasses (2.14%) were observed in the treatments of 400 kg ha -1 and 300 kg ha -1 humic acid, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The H300 treatment (300 kg/ha humic acid) gave the lowest K value in sugar beet, 3.85 meq per 100 g pulp.

Treatment
H300 treatment (300 kg ha -1)e5
Outcome
Ke5
Direction
loweste5
Value
3.85 meq 100 g -1 pulpe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“sugar beet cv. 'Shirin'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–132 · show in text ↑
e5

“The lowest value for K, Na and amino-nitrogen was observed in H300 treatment (300 kg ha -1) with 3.85 meq 100 g -1 pulp, 1.22 meq 100 g -1 pulp and 1.21 meq 100 g -1 pulp, respectively”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 703–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The H300 treatment gave the lowest Na value in sugar beet, 1.22 meq per 100 g pulp.

Treatment
H300 treatment (300 kg ha -1)e5
Outcome
Nae5
Direction
loweste5
Value
1.22 meq 100 g -1 pulpe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“sugar beet cv. 'Shirin'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–132 · show in text ↑
e5

“The lowest value for K, Na and amino-nitrogen was observed in H300 treatment (300 kg ha -1) with 3.85 meq 100 g -1 pulp, 1.22 meq 100 g -1 pulp and 1.21 meq 100 g -1 pulp, respectively”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 703–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The H300 treatment gave the lowest amino-nitrogen value in sugar beet, 1.21 meq per 100 g pulp.

Treatment
H300 treatment (300 kg ha -1)e5
Outcome
amino-nitrogene5
Direction
loweste5
Value
1.21 meq 100 g -1 pulpe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“sugar beet cv. 'Shirin'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–132 · show in text ↑
e5

“The lowest value for K, Na and amino-nitrogen was observed in H300 treatment (300 kg ha -1) with 3.85 meq 100 g -1 pulp, 1.22 meq 100 g -1 pulp and 1.21 meq 100 g -1 pulp, respectively”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 703–888 · show in text ↑

other · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

other · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.