Paper · 2020 · Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

Effect of Humic Acid Application on Quantitative Parameters of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Cv. Shirin

Amir Rahimi; Mustafa Kiralan; Fatemeh Ahmadi

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The present experiment aimed to investigate the influence of humic acid application on qualitative traits of sugar beet cv. ‘Shirin’ basis of a randomized complete block design with four replications during 2007-2008. The plants were treated with different humic acid treatments (control, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 kg ha-1). The non-sugar components such as potassium, sodium, amino-nitrogen and some qualitative parameters for sugar processing such as alkalinity, root yield, sugar percent, recoverable sugar, and sugar content in molasses were determined according to standard methods. According to results, humic acid application enhanced sugar quality of sugar beet. The lowest value of K, Na and amino-nitrogen were observed in H300 sample (300 kg ha-1) with 3.85 meq 100 g-1 pulp, 1.22 meq 100 g-1 pulp and 1.21 meq 100 g-1 pulp, respectively. The highest recoverable sugar content (15.64%) was obtained from 300, 400, 500, and 600 kg ha-1 application. Also, the highest sugar yield resulted from 400, 500, and 600 kg ha-1 and the lowest sugar content in molasses were observed in the treatments of 200 and 300 kg ha-1 humic acid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid enhanced sugar beet sugar quality.

Treatment
humic acid applicatione0
Outcome
sugar qualitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to results, humic acid application enhanced sugar quality of sugar beet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 300 kg ha-1 treatment had the lowest potassium at 3.85 meq 100 g-1 pulp.

Treatment
300 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.85 meq 100 g-1 pulpe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest value of K, Na and amino-nitrogen were observed in H300 sample (300 kg ha-1) with 3.85 meq 100 g-1 pulp, 1.22 meq 100 g-1 pulp and 1.21 meq 100 g-1 pulp, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 300 kg ha-1 treatment had the lowest sodium at 1.22 meq 100 g-1 pulp.

Treatment
300 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
Nae0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.22 meq 100 g-1 pulpe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest value of K, Na and amino-nitrogen were observed in H300 sample (300 kg ha-1) with 3.85 meq 100 g-1 pulp, 1.22 meq 100 g-1 pulp and 1.21 meq 100 g-1 pulp, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 300 kg ha-1 treatment had the lowest amino nitrogen at 1.21 meq 100 g-1 pulp.

Treatment
300 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
amino-nitrogene0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.21 meq 100 g-1 pulpe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest value of K, Na and amino-nitrogen were observed in H300 sample (300 kg ha-1) with 3.85 meq 100 g-1 pulp, 1.22 meq 100 g-1 pulp and 1.21 meq 100 g-1 pulp, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applications of 300, 400, 500 and 600 kg ha-1 produced the highest recoverable sugar content of 15.64%.

Treatment
300, 400, 500, and 600 kg ha-1 applicatione0
Outcome
recoverable sugar contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest recoverable sugar content (15.64%) was obtained from 300, 400, 500, and 600 kg ha-1 application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applications of 400, 500 and 600 kg ha-1 produced the highest sugar yield.

Treatment
400, 500, and 600 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, the highest sugar yield resulted from 400, 500, and 600 kg ha-1 and the lowest sugar content in molasses were observed in the treatments of 200 and 300 kg ha-1 humic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applications of 200 and 300 kg ha-1 produced the lowest sugar content in molasses.

Treatment
200 and 300 kg ha-1 humic acide0
Outcome
sugar content in molassese0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, the highest sugar yield resulted from 400, 500, and 600 kg ha-1 and the lowest sugar content in molasses were observed in the treatments of 200 and 300 kg ha-1 humic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑

other · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

other · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.