Paper · 2007 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF PLOUGHING DEPTH AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SOME QUALITY PARAMETERS OF SUGAR BEET UNDER FAYOUM GOVERNORATE CONDITIONS

N. Azzazy,; M. Osman; A. Khattab

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present work was conducted at Tamiya Agricultural Research Station, Fayoum governorate in 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 growing seasons to study the effect of ploughing depth, nitrogen fertilizer sources and levels on some quality parameters of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). The present study included eighteen treatments represented the combination between two plowing depths (15 and 30 cm), three nitrogen sources (urea, 46.5% N; ammonium nitrate, 33.5% N and ammonium sulphate, 20.5% N) and three nitrogen levels (60, 80 and 100 kg N/fed). Treatments were arranged in a split-split plot design with four replications. Ploughing depths were allocated in the main plots and nitrogen sources were distributed in the sub-plots, while the sub-sub plots were assigned to nitrogen levels. The obtained results showed that percentages of total soluble solids, sucrose, purity, total nitrogen, sodium and potassium in sugar beet roots did not significantly affected by both ploughing depths and nitrogen sources in both seasons. Percentages of total soluble solids, total nitrogen, sodium and potassium significantly increased while, sucrose and purity percentages significantly decreased as the applied nitrogen fertilization level raised from 60 up to 100 kg N/fed, in both seasons. Under conditions of the present work, fertilizing sugar beet with 60 kg N/fed can be recommended to obtain the highest quality traits in terms of sucrose and purity percentages. No significant differences were noticed between ploughing depths and nitrogen sources on quality characteristics of sugar beet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughing depth did not significantly affect sugar beet root soluble solids, sucrose, purity, nitrogen, sodium, or potassium in either season.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
ploughing depthse0
Outcome
total soluble solids, sucrose, purity, total nitrogen, sodium and potassiume0
Direction
did not significantly affectede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentages of total soluble solids, sucrose, purity, total nitrogen, sodium and potassium in sugar beet roots did not significantly affected by both ploughing depths and nitrogen sources in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1020 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen source did not significantly affect sugar beet root soluble solids, sucrose, purity, nitrogen, sodium, or potassium in either season.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
nitrogen sourcese0
Outcome
total soluble solids, sucrose, purity, total nitrogen, sodium and potassiume0
Direction
did not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentages of total soluble solids, sucrose, purity, total nitrogen, sodium and potassium in sugar beet roots did not significantly affected by both ploughing depths and nitrogen sources in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1020 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising nitrogen from 60 to 100 kg N/fed significantly increased sugar beet root total soluble solids.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
nitrogen fertilization level raised from 60 up to 100 kg N/fede0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
60e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentages of total soluble solids, total nitrogen, sodium and potassium significantly increased while, sucrose and purity percentages significantly decreased as the applied nitrogen fertilization level raised from 60 up to 100 kg N/fed, in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1277 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising nitrogen from 60 to 100 kg N/fed significantly increased sugar beet root total nitrogen, sodium and potassium.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
nitrogen fertilization level raised from 60 up to 100 kg N/fede0
Outcome
total nitrogen, sodium and potassiume0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
60e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentages of total soluble solids, total nitrogen, sodium and potassium significantly increased while, sucrose and purity percentages significantly decreased as the applied nitrogen fertilization level raised from 60 up to 100 kg N/fed, in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1277 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising nitrogen from 60 to 100 kg N/fed significantly decreased sugar beet root sucrose and purity percentages.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
nitrogen fertilization level raised from 60 up to 100 kg N/fede0
Outcome
sucrose and purity percentagese0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
60e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sucrose and purity percentages significantly decreased as the applied nitrogen fertilization level raised from 60 up to 100 kg N/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1259 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–927 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 60 kg N/fed for highest sugar beet sucrose and purity percentages under the study conditions.

Treatment
60 kg N/fede0
Outcome
highest quality traits in terms of sucrose and purity percentagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizing sugar beet with 60 kg N/fed can be recommended to obtain the highest quality traits in terms of sucrose and purity percentages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1454 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–927 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

tillage · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 13 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 29 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 45 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.