Abstract
This investigation was carried out at the Experimentals farm of Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorat during 2004/2005 and 2005/2006. This study was conducted to find out the effect of five plant population in terms of five planting patterns i.e. Three ridges 90 cm in width and hill spacing (15, 18 and 22.5 cm apart on the two sides of ridge) thus presents (56.000, 46.666 and 37. 333 plants/fad. respectively), row 50 cm in width and hill spacing of 20 cm apart. (42000 plant/fad.) and ridges 50 cm in width and hill spacing of 20 cm apart (42000 plant/fad.) as well as three nitrogen rates i.e. (80, 100 and 120 kg N/fad.) on yield and quality of sugar beet. Growing sugar beet plants in ridges of 50 cm and hill space of 20 cmcaused a significant increase in root diameter, root/top ratio, sucrose percentage as well as root, top and sugar yields/fad. in both seasons. On the other hand, there was no significant effect on root length, total soluble solids and juice purity percentages; parameters. Application of 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased root diameter, dry matter/plant, root/top ratio, sucrose percentage as well as root; top and sugar yields/fad. in the first season only. No significant effects were found on root length, total soluble solids (T.S.S.) and juice purity percentage in both seasons due to nitrogen fertilizer. It could be concluded that planting sugar beet on ridges 50 cm in with and hill spacing of 20 cm apart and application of nitrogen fertilizer at the rate of 120 kg N/fad. could be recommended for optimum root and sugar yields per unit area under the condition of this study.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Ridges of 50 cm with 20 cm hill spacing significantly increased root diameter in both seasons.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- ridges of 50 cm and hill space of 20 cme0
- Outcome
- root diametere0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growing sugar beet plants in ridges of 50 cm and hill space of 20 cmcaused a significant increase in root diameter, root/top ratio, sucrose percentage as well as root, top and sugar yields/fad. in both seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Ridges of 50 cm with 20 cm hill spacing significantly increased root/top ratio in both seasons.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- ridges of 50 cm and hill space of 20 cme0
- Outcome
- root/top ratioe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growing sugar beet plants in ridges of 50 cm and hill space of 20 cmcaused a significant increase in root diameter, root/top ratio, sucrose percentage as well as root, top and sugar yields/fad. in both seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Ridges of 50 cm with 20 cm hill spacing significantly increased sucrose percentage in both seasons.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- ridges of 50 cm and hill space of 20 cme0
- Outcome
- sucrose percentagee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growing sugar beet plants in ridges of 50 cm and hill space of 20 cmcaused a significant increase in root diameter, root/top ratio, sucrose percentage as well as root, top and sugar yields/fad. in both seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Ridges of 50 cm with 20 cm hill spacing significantly increased root, top and sugar yields/fad. in both seasons.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- ridges of 50 cm and hill space of 20 cme0
- Outcome
- root, top and sugar yields/fad.e0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growing sugar beet plants in ridges of 50 cm and hill space of 20 cmcaused a significant increase in root diameter, root/top ratio, sucrose percentage as well as root, top and sugar yields/fad. in both seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting pattern had no significant effect on root length.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- SOWING PATTERNSt0
- Outcome
- root lengthe0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On the other hand, there was no significant effect on root length, total soluble solids and juice purity percentages; parameters.”
t0“SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY SOWING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN LEVELS”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting pattern had no significant effect on total soluble solids.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- SOWING PATTERNSt0
- Outcome
- total soluble solidse0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On the other hand, there was no significant effect on root length, total soluble solids and juice purity percentages; parameters.”
t0“SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY SOWING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN LEVELS”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting pattern had no significant effect on juice purity percentages.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- SOWING PATTERNSt0
- Outcome
- juice purity percentagese0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On the other hand, there was no significant effect on root length, total soluble solids and juice purity percentages; parameters.”
t0“SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY SOWING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN LEVELS”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased root diameter in the first season only.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 120 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- root diametere0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- in the first season onlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased root diameter, dry matter/plant, root/top ratio, sucrose percentage as well as root; top and sugar yields/fad. in the first season only.”
t0“SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY SOWING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN LEVELS”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased dry matter/plant in the first season only.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 120 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- dry matter/plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- in the first season onlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased root diameter, dry matter/plant, root/top ratio, sucrose percentage as well as root; top and sugar yields/fad. in the first season only.”
t0“SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY SOWING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN LEVELS”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased root/top ratio in the first season only.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 120 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- root/top ratioe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- in the first season onlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased root diameter, dry matter/plant, root/top ratio, sucrose percentage as well as root; top and sugar yields/fad. in the first season only.”
t0“SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY SOWING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN LEVELS”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased sucrose percentage in the first season only.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 120 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- sucrose percentagee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- in the first season onlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased root diameter, dry matter/plant, root/top ratio, sucrose percentage as well as root; top and sugar yields/fad. in the first season only.”
t0“SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY SOWING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN LEVELS”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased root; top and sugar yields/fad. in the first season only.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 120 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- root; top and sugar yields/fad.e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- in the first season onlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased root diameter, dry matter/plant, root/top ratio, sucrose percentage as well as root; top and sugar yields/fad. in the first season only.”
t0“SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY SOWING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN LEVELS”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer had no significant effect on root length in either season.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizere0
- Outcome
- root lengthe0
- Direction
- No significant effectse0
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No significant effects were found on root length, total soluble solids (T.S.S.) and juice purity percentage in both seasons due to nitrogen fertilizer.”
t0“SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY SOWING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN LEVELS”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer had no significant effect on total soluble solids (T.S.S.) in either season.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizere0
- Outcome
- total soluble solids (T.S.S.)e0
- Direction
- No significant effectse0
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No significant effects were found on root length, total soluble solids (T.S.S.) and juice purity percentage in both seasons due to nitrogen fertilizer.”
t0“SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY SOWING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN LEVELS”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer had no significant effect on juice purity percentage in either season.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizere0
- Outcome
- juice purity percentagee0
- Direction
- No significant effectse0
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No significant effects were found on root length, total soluble solids (T.S.S.) and juice purity percentage in both seasons due to nitrogen fertilizer.”
t0“SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY SOWING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN LEVELS”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 50 cm ridges, 20 cm hill spacing, and 120 kg N/fad. for optimum root and sugar yields per unit area.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- 120 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- optimum root and sugar yields per unit areae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“planting sugar beet on ridges 50 cm in with and hill spacing of 20 cm apart and application of nitrogen fertilizer at the rate of 120 kg N/fad. could be recommended for optimum root and sugar yields per unit area under the condition of this study.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
104 papers more in this group
See all 108 papers →fertilization · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
105 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers →nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.