Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF MINERAL AND BIO-FERTILIZATION ON PRODUCTIVITY OF SUGAR BEET

E. Mahmoud; B. Ramadan; I. El - Geddawy; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tow field experiments were conducted during 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 seasons at Sakha Agricultural Research Station , Kafer El-Sheikh, Governorate, Egypt, to study the effect of phosphorus treatments: 30 kg P2O5 and 300 and 600g/fed of phosphorin , Bucillus sp, ( phosphate dissolving bacteria ) and nitrogen treatments : ( 100 kg N, Azotobacter sp +60 or 80 kg N/fed, Azospirillum sp + 60 or 80 kg N/fed, Azoto. + Azosp. + 60 or 80 kg N/fed on yield and quality traits of sugar beet. A split plot design with four replications was used with P treatments in the main plots and N treatments in the sub plots. Results revealed that application of 30 kg P2O5 produced the highest root fresh weight, plant dry weight, LAI, yields of roots, sugar and tops and improved juice quality traits in terms of TSS%, sucrose%, purity%, and recoverable sugar %, followed by phosphorin at the rate of 600g and 300 g/fed in a descending order. On the other hand biophosphatic fertilizer decreased sucrose loss to molasses. Application of 100 kg mineral N/fed produced the highest growth traits followed by Azot. + Azosp. with 80 kgN/fed. The highest values of TSS%, sucrose%, and recoverable sugar resulted from either Azoto. or Azosp.+ 60kgN/fed. Increasing N rates from 60 to 80 kg/fed in combination with N fixing bacteria depressed beet quality and increased impurities in beet roots. The highest root and top yields resulted from 100 kg N/fed, while sugar yield was highest with the combination of Azto. + Azosp. With 60 or 80 kg N /fed followed by 100 kg N/fed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 30 kg P2O5 gave the highest root fresh weight, plant dry weight and LAI in sugar beet.

Treatment
30 kg P2O5e0
Outcome
root fresh weight, plant dry weight, LAIe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30 kg P2O5 produced the highest root fresh weight, plant dry weight, LAI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 30 kg P2O5 gave the highest yields of roots, sugar and tops.

Treatment
30 kg P2O5e0
Outcome
yields of roots, sugar and topse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30 kg P2O5 produced the highest root fresh weight, plant dry weight, LAI, yields of roots, sugar and tops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 30 kg P2O5 improved juice quality traits TSS%, sucrose% and purity%.

Treatment
30 kg P2O5e0
Outcome
juice quality traits in terms of TSS%, sucrose%, purity%e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30 kg P2O5 produced the highest root fresh weight, plant dry weight, LAI, yields of roots, sugar and tops and improved juice quality traits in terms of TSS%, sucrose%, purity%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 30 kg P2O5 improved recoverable sugar percentage.

Treatment
30 kg P2O5e0
Outcome
recoverable sugar %e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30 kg P2O5 produced the highest root fresh weight, plant dry weight, LAI, yields of roots, sugar and tops and improved juice quality traits in terms of TSS%, sucrose%, purity%, and recoverable sugar %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorin at 600 g and 300 g/fed followed 30 kg P2O5 in descending order.

Treatment
phosphorin at the rate of 600g and 300 g/fede0
Outcome
in a descending ordere0
Direction
followed bye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by phosphorin at the rate of 600g and 300 g/fed in a descending order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biophosphatic fertilizer decreased sucrose loss to molasses.

Treatment
biophosphatic fertilizere0
Outcome
sucrose loss to molassese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biophosphatic fertilizer decreased sucrose loss to molasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 100 kg mineral N/fed gave the highest growth traits.

Treatment
100 kg mineral N/fede0
Outcome
growth traitse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100 kg mineral N/fed produced the highest growth traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter plus Azospirillum with 80 kg N/fed gave growth traits second to 100 kg mineral N/fed.

Treatment
Azot. + Azosp. with 80 kgN/fede0
Interactor
Azot.e0symbiont
Second interactor
Azosp.e0symbiont
Outcome
growth traitse0
Direction
followed bye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100 kg mineral N/fed produced the highest growth traits followed by Azot. + Azosp. with 80 kgN/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest TSS%, sucrose% and recoverable sugar resulted from Azotobacter or Azospirillum with 60 kg N/fed.

Treatment
Azoto. or Azosp.+ 60kgN/fede0
Interactor
Azoto.e0symbiont
Second interactor
Azosp.e0symbiont
Outcome
TSS%, sucrose%, and recoverable sugare0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of TSS%, sucrose%, and recoverable sugar resulted from either Azoto. or Azosp.+ 60kgN/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N rates from 60 to 80 kg/fed with N fixing bacteria depressed beet quality.

Treatment
Increasing N rates from 60 to 80 kg/fed in combination with N fixing bacteriae0
Interactor
N fixing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
beet qualitye0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N rates from 60 to 80 kg/fed in combination with N fixing bacteria depressed beet quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N rates from 60 to 80 kg/fed with N fixing bacteria increased impurities in beet roots.

Treatment
Increasing N rates from 60 to 80 kg/fed in combination with N fixing bacteriae0
Interactor
N fixing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
impurities in beet rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N rates from 60 to 80 kg/fed in combination with N fixing bacteria depressed beet quality and increased impurities in beet roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest root and top yields resulted from 100 kg N/fed.

Treatment
100 kg N/fede0
Outcome
root and top yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest root and top yields resulted from 100 kg N/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar yield was highest with Azotobacter plus Azospirillum at 60 or 80 kg N/fed, followed by 100 kg N/fed.

Treatment
combination of Azto. + Azosp. With 60 or 80 kg N /fede0
Interactor
Azto.e0symbiont
Second interactor
Azosp.e0symbiont
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar yield was highest with the combination of Azto. + Azosp. With 60 or 80 kg N /fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–69 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

phosphorus · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 29 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.