Paper · 2012 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

Effects of Bacteria on Cadmium Bioaccumulation in the Cadmium Hyperaccumulator PlantBeta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.

Su Chen; Lei Chao; Lina Sun; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To investigate the effects of two cadmium-tolerant bacteria, Staphylococcus pasteuri (S. pasteuri X1) and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (A. tumefaciens X2), on cadmium uptake by the cadmium hyperaccumulator plant Beta vulgaris var. cicla L., a pot experiment with artificially contaminated soil was conducted. The results demonstrated that both cadmium-tolerant bacteria enhanced the dry weight of Beta vulgaris var. cicla L. The total dry weights of plants in the control CK20, S. pasteuri X1 and A. tumefaciens X2 treatments were 0.85, 1.13, and 1.38 g/pot, respectively. Compared with the control CK20 findings, the total dry weight of plants was increased by 32.8 and 61.1% after inoculation with S. pasteuri X1 and A. tumefaciens X2, respectively, indicating that A. tumefaciens X2 more strongly promoted the growth of Beta vulgaris var. cicla L. than S. pasteuri X1. In addition, inoculation with S. pasteuri X1 and A. tumefaciens X2 significantly (p < 0.05) promoted cadmium uptake by plants and improved the bioaccumulation of cadmium by the plants from the soil. Moreover, the inoculation of S. pasteuri X1 and A. tumefaciens X2 effectively facilitated the transfer of cadmium in the soil from the Fe-Mn oxide and residual fractions to the soluble plus exchangeable and weakly specially adsorbed fractions in the rhizosphere soils of plants. The bacterial enhancement of cadmium phytoavailability might provide a potential and promising method to increase the efficiency of phytoextraction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with S. pasteuri X1 increased total plant dry weight by 32.8% versus CK20.

Taxon
Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.t0
Treatment
inoculation with S. pasteuri X1e0
Interactor
S. pasteuri X1Staphylococcus pasteurie0symbiont
Outcome
total dry weight of plantse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
32.8e0
Comparator
control CK20e0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control CK20 findings, the total dry weight of plants was increased by 32.8 and 61.1% after inoculation with S. pasteuri X1 and A. tumefaciens X2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with A. tumefaciens X2 increased total plant dry weight by 61.1% versus CK20.

Taxon
Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.t0
Treatment
inoculation with S. pasteuri X1 and A. tumefaciens X2e0
Interactor
A. tumefaciens X2Agrobacterium tumefaciense0symbiont
Outcome
total dry weight of plantse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
61.1%e0
Comparator
control CK20e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control CK20 findings, the total dry weight of plants was increased by 32.8 and 61.1% after inoculation with S. pasteuri X1 and A. tumefaciens X2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. tumefaciens X2 promoted plant growth more strongly than S. pasteuri X1.

Taxon
Beta vulgaris var. cicla L.Beta vulgaris subsp. ciclae0
Treatment
A. tumefaciens X2e0
Interactor
A. tumefaciens X2Agrobacterium tumefaciense0symbiont
Second interactor
S. pasteuri X1Staphylococcus pasteurie0symbiont
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
more strongly promotede0
Comparator
S. pasteuri X1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. cicla
Beta vulgaris subsp. cicla · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indicating that A. tumefaciens X2 more strongly promoted the growth of Beta vulgaris var. cicla L. than S. pasteuri X1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S. pasteuri X1 inoculation significantly promoted plant cadmium uptake and bioaccumulation from soil.

Taxon
Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.t0
Treatment
inoculation with S. pasteuri X1e0
Interactor
S. pasteuri X1Staphylococcus pasteurie0symbiont
Outcome
cadmium uptake by plants and improved the bioaccumulation of cadmium by the plants from the soile0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with S. pasteuri X1 and A. tumefaciens X2 significantly (p < 0.05) promoted cadmium uptake by plants and improved the bioaccumulation of cadmium by the plants from the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A. tumefaciens X2 inoculation significantly promoted plant cadmium uptake and bioaccumulation from soil.

Taxon
Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.t0
Treatment
A. tumefaciens X2e0
Interactor
A. tumefaciens X2Agrobacterium tumefaciense0symbiont
Outcome
cadmium uptake by plants and improved the bioaccumulation of cadmium by the plants from the soile0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with S. pasteuri X1 and A. tumefaciens X2 significantly (p < 0.05) promoted cadmium uptake by plants and improved the bioaccumulation of cadmium by the plants from the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with S. pasteuri X1 transferred soil cadmium from Fe-Mn oxide and residual fractions toward more available fractions.

Taxon
Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.t0
Treatment
inoculation of S. pasteuri X1e0
Interactor
S. pasteuri X1Staphylococcus pasteurie0symbiont
Outcome
transfer of cadmium in the soil from the Fe-Mn oxide and residual fractions to the soluble plus exchangeable and weakly specially adsorbed fractionse0
Direction
facilitatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculation of S. pasteuri X1 and A. tumefaciens X2 effectively facilitated the transfer of cadmium in the soil from the Fe-Mn oxide and residual fractions to the soluble plus exchangeable and weakly specially adsorbed fractions in the rhizosphere soils of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with A. tumefaciens X2 transferred soil cadmium from Fe-Mn oxide and residual fractions toward more available fractions.

Taxon
Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.t0
Treatment
A. tumefaciens X2e0
Interactor
A. tumefaciens X2Agrobacterium tumefaciense0symbiont
Outcome
transfer of cadmium in the soil from the Fe-Mn oxide and residual fractions to the soluble plus exchangeable and weakly specially adsorbed fractionse0
Direction
facilitatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculation of S. pasteuri X1 and A. tumefaciens X2 effectively facilitated the transfer of cadmium in the soil from the Fe-Mn oxide and residual fractions to the soluble plus exchangeable and weakly specially adsorbed fractions in the rhizosphere soils of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest bacterial enhancement of cadmium availability as a potential way to improve phytoextraction.

Taxon
Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.t0
Outcome
increase the efficiency of phytoextractione0
Qualifier
might provide a potential and promising methode0

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterial enhancement of cadmium phytoavailability might provide a potential and promising method to increase the efficiency of phytoextraction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beta Vulgaris Var. CiclaL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 25 positive, 6 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.