Abstract
Agronomic practices may need to be adjusted to maximize yield and quality of sugar beet. Thus agronomic package must be always modified. Nanotechnology is one of the new technologies that entered almost all sides of our lives and were used in agriculture production. Two field experiments will be carried out in the experimental farm of the Etsa region at El- Fayoum governorate, Egypt, during the two successive seasons 2015/16 and 2016/17 to investigate the response of yield and quality of sugar beet cv. Farida to foliar application of nano- microelements mixtures and or urea (Zn, Fe, B, Mn and N). Fourteen treatments were studied. The best results were found when sugar beet plants were treated with nano-microelements 200 mg / L+ urea 1% and ranked as the first favorable treatments for root length and diameter, dry matter per plant as root, top and sugar yields in both seasons, followed by the treatment of nano-microelements 160 mg / L+ urea1% for most traits studied. From the obtained results, it could be concluded that the application of nano-microelements 200 mg/L + urea 1% treatment for producing significantly higher yields with improved quality traits of sugar beet and saving of requirements for plants form micronutrient and nitrogen fertilizer if this fertilizer has been added in the form of nanoparticles.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application of nano-microelements 200 mg/L with 1% urea gave the best results for root length and diameter of sugar beet.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise3 - Material
- cv. Faridae2
- Treatment
- nano-microelements 200 mg / L+ urea 1%e3
- Outcome
- root length and diametere3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Setting
- field experimentse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Two field experiments will be carried out in the experimental farm of the Etsa region at El- Fayoum governorate, Egypt”
e2“sugar beet cv. Farida”
e3“The best results were found when sugar beet plants were treated with nano-microelements 200 mg / L+ urea 1% and ranked as the first favorable treatments for root length and diameter, dry matter per plant as root, top and sugar yields in both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application of nano-microelements 200 mg/L with 1% urea gave the best results for dry matter per plant as root, top and sugar yields of sugar beet.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise3
- Material
- cv. Faridae2
- Treatment
- nano-microelements 200 mg / L+ urea 1%e3
- Outcome
- dry matter per plant as root, top and sugar yieldse3
- Direction
- higherinferrede3
- Setting
- field experimentse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Two field experiments will be carried out in the experimental farm of the Etsa region at El- Fayoum governorate, Egypt”
e2“sugar beet cv. Farida”
e3“The best results were found when sugar beet plants were treated with nano-microelements 200 mg / L+ urea 1% and ranked as the first favorable treatments for root length and diameter, dry matter per plant as root, top and sugar yields in both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-microelements 160 mg/L with 1% urea ranked second, behind the 200 mg/L treatment, for most traits of sugar beet.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise3
- Treatment
- nano-microelements 160 mg / L+ urea1%e4
- Outcome
- for most traits studiede4
- Direction
- followed bye4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The best results were found when sugar beet plants were treated with nano-microelements 200 mg / L+ urea 1% and ranked as the first favorable treatments for root length and diameter, dry matter per plant as root, top and sugar yields in both seasons”
e4“followed by the treatment of nano-microelements 160 mg / L+ urea1% for most traits studied”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-microelements 200 mg/L with 1% urea significantly increased sugar beet yields.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise5
- Treatment
- nano-microelements 200 mg/L + urea 1% treatmente5
- Outcome
- yieldse5
- Direction
- highere5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“the application of nano-microelements 200 mg/L + urea 1% treatment for producing significantly higher yields with improved quality traits of sugar beet and saving of requirements for plants form micronutrient and nitrogen fertilizer if this fertilizer has been added in the form of nanoparticles”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-microelements 200 mg/L with 1% urea improved quality traits of sugar beet.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise5
- Treatment
- nano-microelements 200 mg/L + urea 1% treatmente5
- Outcome
- quality traitse5
- Direction
- improvede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“the application of nano-microelements 200 mg/L + urea 1% treatment for producing significantly higher yields with improved quality traits of sugar beet and saving of requirements for plants form micronutrient and nitrogen fertilizer if this fertilizer has been added in the form of nanoparticles”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying micronutrient and nitrogen fertilizer as nanoparticles may save fertilizer requirements for sugar beet.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise5
- Treatment
- nanoparticlese5
- Outcome
- saving of requirements for plants form micronutrient and nitrogen fertilizere5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“the application of nano-microelements 200 mg/L + urea 1% treatment for producing significantly higher yields with improved quality traits of sugar beet and saving of requirements for plants form micronutrient and nitrogen fertilizer if this fertilizer has been added in the form of nanoparticles”
The same questions in other papers
nanoparticle · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →nitrogen · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
104 papers more in this group
See all 108 papers →nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →nanoparticle · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.