Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NP application increased sugar beet root yield by 21.4%.

A claim from Effect of N2-fixing bacterial inoculations on yield of sugar beet and barley · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP application increased sugar beet root yield by 21.4%.

Treatment
NPe0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21.4%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N, P, and NP applications, however, increased root yield up to 13.6, 5.3, and 21.4% and sugar yield by 6.1, 4.0, and 14.8%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1444
e1

“seed inoculation of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1087

Title

Effect of N2-fixing bacterial inoculations on yield of sugar beet and barley

Ramazan Çakmakçı; Faik Kantar; Fikrettin Sahin Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 2001. doi:10.1002/1522-2624(200110)164:5<527::aid-jpln527>3.0.co;2-1

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e34c193a3cd0eef3ad5c261981ecb66b6963ce9e1c4db45ba80e054829289c98 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 19 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.