Paper · 2019 · Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research

IMPACT OF PLANTING DENSITY, NITROGEN AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZER LEVELS ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET

Ehssan Hanafy; A. El-Bana; Mohamed Yasin; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at the experimental farm (Ghazala Village), Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Sharkia Governorate, during 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons to study the influence of three planting densities, (28000, 35000 and 46666 plants/fad.) three levels of N fertilizer (80,100 and 120 kg/fad.) and two levels of potassium fertilizer (24 and 48 kg k2O/fad.) on yield and its attributes as well as quality of sugar beet grown in clay soil. Results of combined analysis illustrated that, decreasing planting density from 46666 to 35000 or 28000 plants/ fad., significantly increased root length, root diameter and fresh root weight g/plant; on the other hand the highest planting density (46666 plants/fad.) produced higher sucrose, extractable sugar percentages, sugar and recoverable sugar yields/fad., than low or medium densities. Raising N fertilizer levels significantly affected yield and its attributes as well as quality of sugar beet. Where, the results of the combined analysis indicated that, each increment of nitrogen fertilizer level from 80 up to 120 kg N/fad., cm was accompanied with a significant increase in root length, root diameter, fresh root weight/plant, root and recoverable sugar yields/fad., but significantly decreased sucrose (%). Data of combined analysis also revealed that application of 48 kg K2O/fad., significantly increased root yield attributes i.e., root length root diameter (cm), fresh root weight g/plant, sucrose, extractable sugar percentages, as well as, root and recoverable sugar yields ton/fad., compared with supply of 24 kg K2O/fad. Interactions between the studied factors (according to the combined analysis) indicated that the highest root yield (ton/fad.) was achieved when sugar beet was sown with the highest plant density of 46666 plants/fad., and fertilized with 120 kg N/fad. As well as, the highest value of root diameter (cm) was achieved under the application of 120 kg N/fad., and addition of 48 kg K2O/fad., while, the interaction between planting densities and potassium fertilizer levels had no significant effects on all studied traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreasing planting density from 46666 to 35000 or 28000 plants/fad. significantly increased root length, root diameter and fresh root weight of sugar beet.

Treatment
decreasing planting density from 46666 to 35000 or 28000 plants/ fad.e1
Outcome
root length, root diameter and fresh root weight g/plante1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreasing planting density from 46666 to 35000 or 28000 plants/ fad., significantly increased root length, root diameter and fresh root weight g/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest planting density (46666 plants/fad.) produced higher sucrose and extractable sugar percentages than low or medium densities in sugar beet.

Treatment
highest planting density (46666 plants/fad.)e2
Outcome
sucrose, extractable sugar percentagese2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
low or medium densitiese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“the highest planting density (46666 plants/fad.) produced higher sucrose, extractable sugar percentages, sugar and recoverable sugar yields/fad., than low or medium densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest planting density (46666 plants/fad.) produced higher sugar and recoverable sugar yields than low or medium densities in sugar beet.

Treatment
highest planting density (46666 plants/fad.)e2
Outcome
sugar and recoverable sugar yields/fad.e2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
low or medium densitiese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
e2

“the highest planting density (46666 plants/fad.) produced higher sucrose, extractable sugar percentages, sugar and recoverable sugar yields/fad., than low or medium densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Each increment of nitrogen from 80 up to 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased root length, root diameter and fresh root weight per plant of sugar beet.

Treatment
each increment of nitrogen fertilizer level from 80 up to 120 kg N/fad.e3
Outcome
root length, root diameter, fresh root weight/plante3
Direction
increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
e3

“each increment of nitrogen fertilizer level from 80 up to 120 kg N/fad., cm was accompanied with a significant increase in root length, root diameter, fresh root weight/plant, root and recoverable sugar yields/fad., but significantly decreased sucrose (%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Each increment of nitrogen from 80 up to 120 kg N/fad. significantly increased root and recoverable sugar yields of sugar beet.

Treatment
each increment of nitrogen fertilizer level from 80 up to 120 kg N/fad.e3
Outcome
root and recoverable sugar yields/fad.e3
Direction
increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
e3

“each increment of nitrogen fertilizer level from 80 up to 120 kg N/fad., cm was accompanied with a significant increase in root length, root diameter, fresh root weight/plant, root and recoverable sugar yields/fad., but significantly decreased sucrose (%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Each increment of nitrogen from 80 up to 120 kg N/fad. significantly decreased sucrose percentage of sugar beet.

Treatment
each increment of nitrogen fertilizer level from 80 up to 120 kg N/fad.e3
Outcome
sucrose (%)e3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
e3

“each increment of nitrogen fertilizer level from 80 up to 120 kg N/fad., cm was accompanied with a significant increase in root length, root diameter, fresh root weight/plant, root and recoverable sugar yields/fad., but significantly decreased sucrose (%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 48 kg K2O/fad. significantly increased root length, root diameter and fresh root weight of sugar beet compared with 24 kg K2O/fad.

Treatment
application of 48 kg K2O/fad.e4
Outcome
root length root diameter (cm), fresh root weight g/plante4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
supply of 24 kg K2O/fad.e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“application of 48 kg K2O/fad., significantly increased root yield attributes i.e., root length root diameter (cm), fresh root weight g/plant, sucrose, extractable sugar percentages, as well as, root and recoverable sugar yields ton/fad., compared with supply of 24 kg K2O/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 48 kg K2O/fad. significantly increased sucrose and extractable sugar percentages of sugar beet compared with 24 kg K2O/fad.

Treatment
application of 48 kg K2O/fad.e4
Outcome
sucrose, extractable sugar percentagese4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
supply of 24 kg K2O/fad.e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“application of 48 kg K2O/fad., significantly increased root yield attributes i.e., root length root diameter (cm), fresh root weight g/plant, sucrose, extractable sugar percentages, as well as, root and recoverable sugar yields ton/fad., compared with supply of 24 kg K2O/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 48 kg K2O/fad. significantly increased root and recoverable sugar yields of sugar beet compared with 24 kg K2O/fad.

Treatment
application of 48 kg K2O/fad.e4
Outcome
root and recoverable sugar yields ton/fad.e4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
supply of 24 kg K2O/fad.e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
e4

“application of 48 kg K2O/fad., significantly increased root yield attributes i.e., root length root diameter (cm), fresh root weight g/plant, sucrose, extractable sugar percentages, as well as, root and recoverable sugar yields ton/fad., compared with supply of 24 kg K2O/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest root yield of sugar beet was achieved at the highest planting density (46666 plants/fad.) combined with 120 kg N/fad.

Treatment
highest plant density of 46666 plants/fad., and fertilized with 120 kg N/fad.e5
Outcome
root yield (ton/fad.)e5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
e5

“the highest root yield (ton/fad.) was achieved when sugar beet was sown with the highest plant density of 46666 plants/fad., and fertilized with 120 kg N/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest root diameter of sugar beet was achieved under 120 kg N/fad. combined with 48 kg K2O/fad.

Treatment
application of 120 kg N/fad., and addition of 48 kg K2O/fad.e6
Outcome
root diameter (cm)e6
Direction
higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
e6

“the highest value of root diameter (cm) was achieved under the application of 120 kg N/fad., and addition of 48 kg K2O/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1881–2004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between planting density and potassium level had no significant effect on any studied trait of sugar beet.

Treatment
the interaction between planting densities and potassium fertilizer levelse7
Outcome
all studied traitse7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
e7

“the interaction between planting densities and potassium fertilizer levels had no significant effects on all studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2013–2136 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

58 papers: 52 positive, 6 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

density · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

potassium · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

density · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 29 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 45 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 237 positive, 30 negative or no effect

236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.