Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Adding potassium to distilled water decreased insoluble oxalate.

A claim from Accumulation of Oxalate in Tissues of Sugar-beet, and the Effect of Nitrogen Supply · 1964

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding potassium to distilled water decreased insoluble oxalate.

Treatment
potassiume0t0e1
Outcome
insoluble oxalatee0t0e1
Direction
decreasee0t0e1
Comparator
distilled watere0t0e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of potassium caused a decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1124
t0

“Accumulation of Oxalate in Tissues of Sugar-beet, and the Effect of Nitrogen Supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83
e1

“Addition of calcium and nitrate to the distilled water caused an increase of insoluble oxalate, while addition of potassium caused a decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1124

Title

Accumulation of Oxalate in Tissues of Sugar-beet, and the Effect of Nitrogen Supply

K. W. JOY Annals of Botany 1964. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083925

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-2e6ebb68d3ad3ec6e54fe92f415248f5c8faed427ce8369f3d1393ec21b976b6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

potassium · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Potassium deficit decreased leaf and root potassium content.

    Effects of potassium deficiency and replacement of potassium by sodium on sugar beet plants · 2014 · compared with control groups

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.