Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted at El-Serw Agricultural Research Station, Damietta Governorate, during 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 seasons, to study the effect of farmyard manure (0, 10, 20 and 30 m3/fad), plant densities (33600, 42000 and 56000 plant/fad), four biofertilizer treatments (without treated, inoculation seeds with Cerialine, Netrobine at 450 g/fad and 90 kg N/fad as a mineral fertilizer)and their interactions on growth and yield of sugar beet . The obtained results indicated that farmyard manure had a significant effect on average values of root fresh weight, sucrose %, purity % and yields of top, root and sugar/fad in both seasons. Increasing farmyard manure rate up to 30 m3/fad significantly increased root fresh weight, top yield/fad, root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad but, decreased sucrose % and purity % as compared to control (without added farmyard manure) in both seasons. Plant density significantly affected all studied traits in both seasons. The highest plant density 56000 plant/fad gave the highest values of sucrose %, purity %, top yield /fad, root yield /fad and sugar yield/fad, but it gave the lowest root fresh weight. On the contrary, the heaviest root was recorded with the lowest plant density 33600 plant/fad as compared with other studied plant densities in 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 seasons. Results indicated that fertilization treatments had a significant effect on all studied characters in both seasons. Applying nitrogen as a mineral fertilizer at a rate of 90 kg N/fad gave the highest values of root fresh weight, top yield/fad, root yield/fad and sugar yield/fad as compared with all other fertilization treatment, in 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 seasons. In this connection, cerialine biofertilizer followed the mineral nitrogen of the mentioned previously traits. The interaction between farmyard manure rates and plant densities, the interaction between farmyard manure rates and biofertilization treatments and the interaction between plant densities and biofertilization treatments were significantly affected all studied traits in both seasons. The interaction effect among farmyard manure, plant density and fertilization treatments was significant on all studied characters in both seasons. Plants received 30 m3/fad farmyard manure at the highest plant density 56000 plant/fad and fertilized by 90 kg N/fad gave the highest top yield/fad 33.65 and 39.28 tons, root yield/fad 40.76 and 39.20 tons as well as sugar yield/fad 7.11 and 6.75 tons compared to all other this interaction treatments in 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 seasons, respectively. Generally, it could be recommended that applied farmyard manure at the rate of 30 m3/fad for sugar beet plants sown at plant density of 56000 plant/fad, and fertilized by 90 kg N/fad gave the highest root and sugar yield/fad at North Delta, Damietta Governorate, Egypt
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing manure to 30 m3/fad increased root fresh weight in both seasons.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEET
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- farmyard manure rate up to 30 m3/fade0
- Outcome
- root fresh weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control (without added farmyard manure)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing farmyard manure rate up to 30 m3/fad significantly increased root fresh weight, top yield/fad, root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad but, decreased sucrose % and purity % as compared to control (without added farmyard manure) in both seasons.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing manure to 30 m3/fad increased top yield/fad in both seasons.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- farmyard manure rate up to 30 m3/fade0
- Outcome
- top yield/fade0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control (without added farmyard manure)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing farmyard manure rate up to 30 m3/fad significantly increased root fresh weight, top yield/fad, root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad but, decreased sucrose % and purity % as compared to control (without added farmyard manure) in both seasons.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing manure to 30 m3/fad increased root yield/fad in both seasons.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- farmyard manure rate up to 30 m3/fade0
- Outcome
- root yield/fade0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control (without added farmyard manure)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing farmyard manure rate up to 30 m3/fad significantly increased root fresh weight, top yield/fad, root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad but, decreased sucrose % and purity % as compared to control (without added farmyard manure) in both seasons.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing manure to 30 m3/fad increased sugar yield/fad in both seasons.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- farmyard manure rate up to 30 m3/fade0
- Outcome
- sugar yield/fade0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control (without added farmyard manure)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing farmyard manure rate up to 30 m3/fad significantly increased root fresh weight, top yield/fad, root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad but, decreased sucrose % and purity % as compared to control (without added farmyard manure) in both seasons.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing manure to 30 m3/fad decreased sucrose % and purity % in both seasons.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- farmyard manure rate up to 30 m3/fade0
- Outcome
- sucrose % and purity %e0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- control (without added farmyard manure)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increasing farmyard manure rate up to 30 m3/fad significantly increased root fresh weight, top yield/fad, root yield/fad as well as sugar yield/fad but, decreased sucrose % and purity % as compared to control (without added farmyard manure) in both seasons.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
At 56000 plant/fad sugar beet had the highest sucrose %, purity %.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 56000 plant/fade0
- Outcome
- sucrose %, purity %e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest plant density 56000 plant/fad gave the highest values of sucrose %, purity %, top yield /fad, root yield /fad and sugar yield/fad, but it gave the lowest root fresh weight.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
At 56000 plant/fad sugar beet had the highest top yield /fad, root yield /fad and sugar yield/fad.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 56000 plant/fade0
- Outcome
- top yield /fad, root yield /fad and sugar yield/fade0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest plant density 56000 plant/fad gave the highest values of sucrose %, purity %, top yield /fad, root yield /fad and sugar yield/fad, but it gave the lowest root fresh weight.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
At 56000 plant/fad sugar beet had the lowest root fresh weight.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 56000 plant/fade0
- Outcome
- root fresh weighte0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest plant density 56000 plant/fad gave the highest values of sucrose %, purity %, top yield /fad, root yield /fad and sugar yield/fad, but it gave the lowest root fresh weight.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
The lowest density produced the heaviest roots.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 33600 plant/fade0
- Outcome
- heaviest roote0
- Direction
- heavieste0
- Comparator
- other studied plant densitiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the heaviest root was recorded with the lowest plant density 33600 plant/fad as compared with other studied plant densities in 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 seasons.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral nitrogen gave the highest root fresh weight.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 90 kg N/fade0
- Outcome
- root fresh weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- all other fertilization treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Applying nitrogen as a mineral fertilizer at a rate of 90 kg N/fad gave the highest values of root fresh weight, top yield/fad, root yield/fad and sugar yield/fad as compared with all other fertilization treatment”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral nitrogen gave the highest top yield/fad, root yield/fad and sugar yield/fad.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 90 kg N/fade0
- Outcome
- top yield/fad, root yield/fad and sugar yield/fade0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- all other fertilization treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Applying nitrogen as a mineral fertilizer at a rate of 90 kg N/fad gave the highest values of root fresh weight, top yield/fad, root yield/fad and sugar yield/fad as compared with all other fertilization treatment”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Cerialine biofertilizer ranked after mineral nitrogen for the named traits.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- cerialine biofertilizere0
- Outcome
- followed the mineral nitrogene0
- Direction
- followede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cerialine biofertilizer followed the mineral nitrogen of the mentioned previously traits.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Manure, density and fertilization interacted significantly across studied traits.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- farmyard manure, plant density and fertilization treatmentse0
- Outcome
- all studied characterse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction effect among farmyard manure, plant density and fertilization treatments was significant on all studied characters in both seasons.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined high manure, density and nitrogen produced the highest top yield/fad.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 30 m3/fad farmyard manure at the highest plant density 56000 plant/fad and fertilized by 90 kg N/fade0
- Outcome
- top yield/fade0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 33.65 and 39.28 tonse0
- Comparator
- all other this interaction treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants received 30 m3/fad farmyard manure at the highest plant density 56000 plant/fad and fertilized by 90 kg N/fad gave the highest top yield/fad 33.65 and 39.28 tons, root yield/fad 40.76 and 39.20 tons as well as sugar yield/fad 7.11 and 6.75 tons compared to all other this interaction treatments in 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 seasons, respectively.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined high manure, density and nitrogen produced the highest root yield/fad.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 30 m3/fad farmyard manure at the highest plant density 56000 plant/fad and fertilized by 90 kg N/fade0
- Outcome
- root yield/fade0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 40.76 and 39.20 tonse0
- Comparator
- all other this interaction treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants received 30 m3/fad farmyard manure at the highest plant density 56000 plant/fad and fertilized by 90 kg N/fad gave the highest top yield/fad 33.65 and 39.28 tons, root yield/fad 40.76 and 39.20 tons as well as sugar yield/fad 7.11 and 6.75 tons compared to all other this interaction treatments in 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 seasons, respectively.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined high manure, density and nitrogen produced the highest sugar yield/fad.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 30 m3/fad farmyard manure at the highest plant density 56000 plant/fad and fertilized by 90 kg N/fade0
- Outcome
- sugar yield/fade0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 7.11 and 6.75 tonse0
- Comparator
- all other this interaction treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants received 30 m3/fad farmyard manure at the highest plant density 56000 plant/fad and fertilized by 90 kg N/fad gave the highest top yield/fad 33.65 and 39.28 tons, root yield/fad 40.76 and 39.20 tons as well as sugar yield/fad 7.11 and 6.75 tons compared to all other this interaction treatments in 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 seasons, respectively.”
t0“EFFECT OF FARMYARD MANURE, PLANT DENSITY AND BIOFERTILIZER TREATMENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 30 m3/fad manure, 56000 plant/fad and 90 kg N/fad for sugar beet in the North Delta.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- farmyard manure at the rate of 30 m3/fade0
- Outcome
- highest root and sugar yield/fade0
- Setting
- North Delta, Damietta Governorate, Egypte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Generally, it could be recommended that applied farmyard manure at the rate of 30 m3/fad for sugar beet plants sown at plant density of 56000 plant/fad, and fertilized by 90 kg N/fad gave the highest root and sugar yield/fad at North Delta, Damietta Governorate, Egypt”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →density · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →density · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
104 papers more in this group
See all 108 papers →fertilization · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
105 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers →nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.