Paper · 2023 · Sustainability

Evaluation of Various Organic Amendment Sources to Improve the Root Yield and Sugar Contents of Sugar Beet Genotypes (Beta vulgaris L.) under Arid Environments

Muhammad Ijaz; Sami Ul-Allah; Abdul Sattar; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is a sucrose-rich tap root crop, with its fresh root containing up to 20% sucrose contents. Natural organic fertilizers can be a good alternative to synthetic fertilizers. For this purpose, an experiment was conducted for the optimization of different organic amendments i.e., farmyard manure, poultry manure, compost, and biochar. After the optimization experiment, pre-optimized doses of different organic amendments (farmyard manure, 40 t ha−1; poultry manure, 20 t ha−1; compost, 40 t ha−1; and biochar, 20 t ha−1) were evaluated for the production and root quality of two diverse sugar beet genotypes. The experiment was repeated over time (2019 and 2020) at four locations (BZU Research Farm Layyah, Farmer Field Layyah, Farmer Field Bhakkar-A and Farmer Field Bhakkar-B). Among different organic amendments, the use of an optimized rate of poultry manure (20 t ha−1) was the most useful for improvement in root yield, sugar yield and sugar quality. Improvement in root yield was attributed to better leaf growth and root yield which resulted eventually in higher reserve accumulation in roots. The performance of genotype ‘California’ was superior to the genotype ‘Serenada’. In conclusion, growing of genotype ‘California’ in sandy loam soils with poultry manure application (20 t ha−1) might be a pragmatic option to improve the sugar beet yield and sugar recovery.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure at 20 t ha−1 was the most useful amendment for root yield, sugar yield and sugar quality.

Treatment
poultry manure (20 t ha−1)e0
Outcome
root yield, sugar yield and sugar qualitye0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
different organic amendmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of an optimized rate of poultry manure (20 t ha−1) was the most useful for improvement in root yield, sugar yield and sugar quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among different organic amendments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–843 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved root yield was attributed to better leaf growth and root yield leading to higher reserves in roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
higher reserve accumulation in rootse0
Qualifier
better leaf growth and root yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improvement in root yield was attributed to better leaf growth and root yield which resulted eventually in higher reserve accumulation in roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

California performed better than Serenada.

Material
Californiae0
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Serenadae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The performance of genotype ‘California’ was superior to the genotype ‘Serenada’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–116 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest growing California in sandy loam soil with 20 t ha−1 poultry manure to improve yield and sugar recovery.

Material
Californiae0
Treatment
poultry manure application (20 t ha−1)e0
Outcome
sugar beet yield and sugar recoverye0
Setting
sandy loam soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing of genotype ‘California’ in sandy loam soils with poultry manure application (20 t ha−1) might be a pragmatic option to improve the sugar beet yield and sugar recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1403 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.