density · Quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)
23 claims from these papers; 3 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
3 citations between these papers: 3 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 13
Evaluation of intercropped sugar beets Beta vulgaris L. with emphasis on competition for light · 1971
- positive
Plant populations and row widths for diploid sugar-beet cultivars · 2002
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- negative
EFFECT OF SOWING DATE AND PLANT DENSITY ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET · 2007
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 5
Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, plant population and irrigation on sugar beet: I. Yields · 1971
- no effect
Seed Spacing for Nonthinned Sugarbeet Production · 1991
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
Effect of plant spacing on marketable yield of table beet (Beta vulgaris L.) · 2017
- no effect
Replanting Guidelines for Sugar Beet Production in Southern Minnesota · 2019
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.