Paper · 2016 · Environmental Entomology

Response ofPemphigus betae(Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Beneficial Epigeal Arthropod Communities to Sugarbeet Plant Density and Seed-Applied Insecticide in Western Nebraska

R. J. Pretorius; G. L. Hein; E. E. Blankenship; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris). Ground beetles and centipedes were the most commonly collected taxa during 2012 and 2013, respectively. Centipede, spider, and rove beetle activity densities were not affected by the seed-applied insecticide, whereas plant density had a marginal effect on centipede activity density during 2012. Ground beetle species richness, diversity, and evenness were also not impacted by the seed treatments. However, during 2013, ground beetle activity density was significantly higher in plots planted with untreated sugarbeet seeds due to the abundance of Bembidion quadrimaculatum oppositum Say. Sugarbeet root aphid populations were significantly higher in the untreated plots during both years. In 2012, sugarbeet tonnage and sugar yield were higher under the low plant density treatment, while higher sugar content was recorded from the seed-applied insecticide plots (2013). Seed-applied neonicotinoids and plant density had little impact on beneficial epigeal arthropod activity density. Seed treatment did result in decreased root aphid populations; however, these reductions were not sufficient to be considered as an adequate control. This limited aphid control likely contributed to inconsistent effects on yield parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground beetles and centipedes were the most commonly collected taxa in the sugarbeet plots during 2012 and 2013.

Taxon
sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0
Outcome
most commonly collected taxae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–320 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ground beetles and centipedes were the most commonly collected taxa during 2012 and 2013, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-applied insecticide did not affect centipede, spider and rove beetle activity densities.

Taxon
sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0
Treatment
seed-applied insecticidee2
Outcome
Centipede, spider, and rove beetle activity densitiese2
Direction
not affectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–320 · show in text ↑
e2

“Centipede, spider, and rove beetle activity densities were not affected by the seed-applied insecticide, whereas plant density had a marginal effect on centipede activity density during 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density had a marginal effect on centipede activity density in 2012.

Taxon
sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0
Treatment
plant densitye2
Outcome
centipede activity densitye2
Qualifier
during 2012e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–320 · show in text ↑
e2

“Centipede, spider, and rove beetle activity densities were not affected by the seed-applied insecticide, whereas plant density had a marginal effect on centipede activity density during 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatments did not affect ground beetle species richness, diversity or evenness.

Taxon
sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0
Treatment
seed treatmentse3
Outcome
species richness, diversity, and evennesse3
Direction
not impactede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–320 · show in text ↑
e3

“Ground beetle species richness, diversity, and evenness were also not impacted by the seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2013, ground beetle activity density was significantly higher in plots planted with untreated sugarbeet seeds.

Taxon
sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0
Treatment
untreated sugarbeet seedse4
Outcome
ground beetle activity densitye4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
due to the abundance of Bembidion quadrimaculatum oppositum Saye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–320 · show in text ↑
e4

“during 2013, ground beetle activity density was significantly higher in plots planted with untreated sugarbeet seeds due to the abundance of Bembidion quadrimaculatum oppositum Say”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarbeet root aphid populations were significantly higher in untreated plots in both years.

Taxon
sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0
Treatment
seed-applied insecticidee0
Interactor
Pemphigus betaePemphigus betaee0pest
Outcome
root aphid populationse5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
untreated plotse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–320 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sugarbeet root aphid populations were significantly higher in the untreated plots during both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment decreased root aphid populations, but the reduction was not sufficient for adequate control.

Taxon
sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0
Treatment
Seed treatmente6
Interactor
Pemphigus betaePemphigus betaee0pest
Outcome
root aphid populationse6
Direction
decreasede6
Qualifier
not sufficient to be considered as an adequate controle6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–320 · show in text ↑
e6

“Seed treatment did result in decreased root aphid populations; however, these reductions were not sufficient to be considered as an adequate control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012, sugarbeet tonnage and sugar yield were higher under the low plant density treatment.

Taxon
sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0
Treatment
low plant density treatmente7
Outcome
sugarbeet tonnage and sugar yielde7
Direction
highere7
Qualifier
In 2012e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–320 · show in text ↑
e7

“In 2012, sugarbeet tonnage and sugar yield were higher under the low plant density treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar content was higher in the seed-applied insecticide plots in 2013.

Taxon
sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0
Treatment
seed-applied insecticide plotse2
Outcome
sugar contente2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
2013e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–320 · show in text ↑
e2

“while higher sugar content was recorded from the seed-applied insecticide plots (2013)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-applied neonicotinoids and plant density had little impact on beneficial epigeal arthropod activity density.

Taxon
sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0
Treatment
Seed-applied neonicotinoids and plant densitye2
Outcome
beneficial epigeal arthropod activity densitye2
Direction
little impacte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–320 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seed-applied neonicotinoids and plant density had little impact on beneficial epigeal arthropod activity density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1307 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited aphid control likely contributed to inconsistent effects of the treatments on yield parameters.

Taxon
sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0
Outcome
yield parameterse2
Qualifier
limited aphid controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–320 · show in text ↑
e2

“This limited aphid control likely contributed to inconsistent effects on yield parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1548 · show in text ↑

density · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

insecticide · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.