Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In 2012, sugarbeet tonnage and sugar yield were higher under the low plant density treatment.

A claim from Response ofPemphigus betae(Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Beneficial Epigeal Arthropod Communities to Sugarbeet Plant Density and Seed-Applied Insecticide in Western Nebraska · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012, sugarbeet tonnage and sugar yield were higher under the low plant density treatment.

Taxon
sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)Beta vulgarise0
Treatment
low plant density treatmente7
Outcome
sugarbeet tonnage and sugar yielde7
Direction
highere7
Qualifier
In 2012e7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–320
e7

“In 2012, sugarbeet tonnage and sugar yield were higher under the low plant density treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1105

Title

Response ofPemphigus betae(Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Beneficial Epigeal Arthropod Communities to Sugarbeet Plant Density and Seed-Applied Insecticide in Western Nebraska

R. J. Pretorius; G. L. Hein; E. E. Blankenship; et al. Environmental Entomology 2016. doi:10.1093/ee/nvw157

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-13dbdbed8d40e6dff446f4ae6cf3d6e3f37121f3acb78d65fb01e483c4eed636 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

density · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.