Abstract
This study was conducted in order to investigte the effect of field emergence levels with and without thinning on the root yield and quality of sugarbeet (cv. Eva) on the Experimental Farm of Turkish Sugar Factories Corporation in Pasinler Plateau (Erzurum) in 1992 and 1993. The experiment comparied two intra-row spacings (8 cm and 15 cm within rows), thinning (thinned and nonthinned) and three emergence levels (60, 50 and 35 %). Emergence levels were obtained by mixing seed with 0, 20 and 40 % dead seed material. Row spacing was 45 cm apart in all treatments. Laboratory germination was 90, 72 and 54 % in seed, respectively with corresponding field emergence rates of 60, 50 and 35 %. When emergence level was about 50-60 %, there was no difference between the treatments of nonthinning sown with 15 cm within row spacing and thinning sown with 8 cm within row spacing in term of root yield, sugar content, dry-matter, clear juice purity, amino-N, Na and white sugar content. When field emergence percentage decreased to 35 %, the differences between nonthinning sown in 15 cm intervals and thinning sown in 8 cm intervals, yield and quality significantly (P
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
At about 50-60 % emergence, nonthinned sugarbeet sown at 15 cm within-row spacing showed no difference from thinned sugarbeet sown at 8 cm in root yield, sugar content and dry-matter.
- Taxon
- sugarbeet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Material
- cv. Evae0
- Treatment
- nonthinning sown with 15 cm within row spacinge1
- Outcome
- root yield, sugar content, dry-mattere1
- Direction
- no differencee1
- Qualifier
- about 50-60 %e1
- Comparator
- thinning sown with 8 cm within row spacinge1
- Setting
- Pasinler Plateau (Erzurum)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root yield and quality of sugarbeet (cv. Eva) on the Experimental Farm of Turkish Sugar Factories Corporation in Pasinler Plateau (Erzurum) in 1992 and 1993”
e1“When emergence level was about 50-60 %, there was no difference between the treatments of nonthinning sown with 15 cm within row spacing and thinning sown with 8 cm within row spacing in term of root yield, sugar content, dry-matter, clear juice purity, amino-N, Na and white sugar content”
Claim · model-written summary
At about 50-60 % emergence, the same comparison showed no difference in clear juice purity, amino-N and Na.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Material
- cv. Evae0
- Treatment
- nonthinning sown with 15 cm within row spacinge1
- Outcome
- clear juice purity, amino-N, Nae1
- Direction
- no differencee1
- Qualifier
- about 50-60 %e1
- Comparator
- thinning sown with 8 cm within row spacinge1
- Setting
- Pasinler Plateau (Erzurum)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root yield and quality of sugarbeet (cv. Eva) on the Experimental Farm of Turkish Sugar Factories Corporation in Pasinler Plateau (Erzurum) in 1992 and 1993”
e1“When emergence level was about 50-60 %, there was no difference between the treatments of nonthinning sown with 15 cm within row spacing and thinning sown with 8 cm within row spacing in term of root yield, sugar content, dry-matter, clear juice purity, amino-N, Na and white sugar content”
Claim · model-written summary
At about 50-60 % emergence, the same comparison showed no difference in white sugar content.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Material
- cv. Evae0
- Treatment
- nonthinning sown with 15 cm within row spacinge1
- Outcome
- white sugar contente1
- Direction
- no differencee1
- Qualifier
- about 50-60 %e1
- Comparator
- thinning sown with 8 cm within row spacinge1
- Setting
- Pasinler Plateau (Erzurum)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root yield and quality of sugarbeet (cv. Eva) on the Experimental Farm of Turkish Sugar Factories Corporation in Pasinler Plateau (Erzurum) in 1992 and 1993”
e1“When emergence level was about 50-60 %, there was no difference between the treatments of nonthinning sown with 15 cm within row spacing and thinning sown with 8 cm within row spacing in term of root yield, sugar content, dry-matter, clear juice purity, amino-N, Na and white sugar content”
Claim · model-written summary
At 35 % field emergence, the differences between nonthinned 15 cm and thinned 8 cm sugarbeet in yield and quality were significant; the direction is not stated in the abstract.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Material
- cv. Evae0
- Treatment
- nonthinning sown in 15 cm intervalse2
- Outcome
- yield and qualitye2
- Qualifier
- field emergence percentage decreased to 35 %e2
- Comparator
- thinning sown in 8 cm intervalse2
- Setting
- Pasinler Plateau (Erzurum)e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“root yield and quality of sugarbeet (cv. Eva) on the Experimental Farm of Turkish Sugar Factories Corporation in Pasinler Plateau (Erzurum) in 1992 and 1993”
e2“When field emergence percentage decreased to 35 %, the differences between nonthinning sown in 15 cm intervals and thinning sown in 8 cm intervals, yield and quality significantly”
The same questions in other papers
density · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.