Paper · 2002 · Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research

Plant populations and row widths for diploid sugar-beet cultivars

B. Rice

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This work aimed to establish whether a change from triploid to diploid cultivars would require any adjustment of the conventional plant populations and row widths used in sugar-beet production. In five trials, the diploid cultivar Celt was sown at three row widths: 51, 56 and 61 cm. At each width, seed spacings were adjusted so that four seed counts, between 50000 and 113000 seeds / ha, were sown. In four of these trials, plant establishment was 78 to 90% and yield (root, sugar) and sugar concentration were not significantly affected by the plant population density achieved. In one trial, where plant establishment was 58%, yield and sugar concentration continued to increase up to the highest plant density of 65 000 plants / ha. There were no yield or quality differences between 51-cm and 56-cm rows. On average, there was a reduction of 3.5% in extractable sugar yield with 61-cm rows; this was highly significant in one experiment. These results suggest that no change is required to the target plant populations used in Ireland. For those currently using 61-cm rows, a small yield increase may be achieved by reducing row width.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In four trials with 78 to 90% establishment, root and sugar yield and sugar concentration were not significantly affected by plant population density.

Treatment
plant population densitye0
Outcome
yield (root, sugar) and sugar concentratione0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“In four of these trials, plant establishment was 78 to 90% and yield (root, sugar) and sugar concentration were not significantly affected by the plant population density achieved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the one trial with 58% establishment, yield and sugar concentration continued to increase up to the highest density of 65 000 plants/ha.

Treatment
highest plant density of 65 000 plants / hae0
Outcome
yield and sugar concentratione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“In one trial, where plant establishment was 58%, yield and sugar concentration continued to increase up to the highest plant density of 65 000 plants / ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There were no yield or quality differences between 51-cm and 56-cm rows.

Treatment
51-cme0
Outcome
yield or qualitye0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
56-cm rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were no yield or quality differences between 51-cm and 56-cm rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average, 61-cm rows reduced extractable sugar yield by 3.5%, highly significant in one experiment.

Treatment
61-cm rowse0
Outcome
extractable sugar yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
3.5%e0
Qualifier
highly significant in one experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“On average, there was a reduction of 3.5% in extractable sugar yield with 61-cm rows; this was highly significant in one experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–942 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that no change to target plant populations is required in Ireland.

Outcome
no change is required to the target plant populationse0
Setting
Irelande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“These results suggest that no change is required to the target plant populations used in Ireland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1040 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For growers using 61-cm rows, a small yield increase may be achieved by reducing row width.

Treatment
reducing row widthe0
Outcome
small yield increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“For those currently using 61-cm rows, a small yield increase may be achieved by reducing row width”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1140 · show in text ↑

density · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.