Paper · 2010 · Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University/Journal of research Pubjab Agricultural University

Influence of Planting Density and Nitrogen Dose on Root and Sugar Yeild of Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Under Sub-tropical Semi-Arid Conditions of Punjab

Makhan Singh Bhullar; S. K. Uppal; Manju Lata Kapur

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field trial was conducted at Ladhowal, Ludhiana during 2002–03 and 2003–04 to study the effects of planting density and nitrogen on sugar beet. Three planting densities – 83,333 plants (rows spaced at 60cm and plants at 20cm), 1, 00,000 plants (50 cm x 20 cm) and 1, 11,111 plants (60 cm x 15 cm) ha−1 and five nitrogen levels i.e. 120, 150 and 180 kg N ha−1 alone, 90 kg N ha−1 + 20 t farm yard manure (FYM) ha−1 and 120 kg N ha−1 + 20 t FYM ha−1 were evaluated in RBD with three replications. A basal dose of 60 kg ha−1 each of P and K was applied to all the treatments. On an average, planting density of 1, 00,000 plants ha−1 produced the highest beet root and sugar yield. Among nitrogen levels, the response was significant up to 150 Kg N ha−1. Addition of 20 t FYM ha−1 along with 90 kg N ha−1 produced similar root and sugar yield to 120 kg N ha−1 alone. The yields were also similar with 150 kg N ha−1 alone and, 120 kg N ha−1 + 20 t FYM ha−1. Sucrose content in beet roots did not vary statistically among plant densities and nitrogen levels, rather addition of FYM revealed higher sucrose content in roots as compared to without FYM.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A density of 100,000 plants per hectare gave the highest root and sugar yield.

Taxon
Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
planting density of 1, 00,000 plants ha−1e0
Outcome
beet root and sugar yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting density of 1, 00,000 plants ha−1 produced the highest beet root and sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen response was significant up to 150 kg N per hectare.

Taxon
Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
150 Kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
responsee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among nitrogen levels, the response was significant up to 150 Kg N ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure with 90 kg N gave similar root and sugar yield to 120 kg N alone.

Taxon
Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
20 t FYM ha−1 along with 90 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
root and sugar yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
120 kg N ha−1 alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of 20 t FYM ha−1 along with 90 kg N ha−1 produced similar root and sugar yield to 120 kg N ha−1 alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg N alone and 120 kg N plus farmyard manure gave similar yields.

Taxon
Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
120 kg N ha−1 + 20 t FYM ha−1e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
150 kg N ha−1 alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yields were also similar with 150 kg N ha−1 alone and, 120 kg N ha−1 + 20 t FYM ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root sucrose content did not differ statistically across densities and nitrogen levels.

Taxon
Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
plant densities and nitrogen levelse0
Outcome
Sucrose content in beet rootse0
Direction
did not varye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose content in beet roots did not vary statistically among plant densities and nitrogen levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure raised root sucrose content versus no manure.

Taxon
Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)Beta vulgarist0
Treatment
addition of FYMe0
Outcome
sucrose content in rootse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
without FYMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of FYM revealed higher sucrose content in roots as compared to without FYM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

density · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 142 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 237 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 237 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.