Abstract
Growing of sugar beet in the tropics and subtropics is rapidly increasing as an important component of the sugar industry. The present study was carried out at the Agricultural Research Farm of the Delta sugar Company, El-Hamoul, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt during the two successive growing seasons 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 to evaluate the response of sugar beet varieties to three sowing dates under four geometrical distribution-based planting densities.The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant and highly significant effects of sowing dates, planting densities and varieties as well as their interactions on the yield and quality parameters of sugar beet, i.e., sucrose% (Pol%), Na%, K%, α-amino-N%, quality index (Qz)%, root yield (RY), recoverable sugar (RS)%, recoverable sugar yield (RSY), sugar loss (SL)% and sugar loss yield (SLY). The highest root and recoverable sugar yields were produced from the late cultivation of the variety Santoline on October 16. Early cultivation of the Steel variety on August 17 at a high planting density (80,000 plants fed-1) produced the highest values of sucrose content, RS% and Qz%, but the lowest values of Na%, K%, α-amino-N% and SL% in the two growing seasons. Whereas late sowing of the Santoline variety on October 16 at a moderate-low planting density of 53,300 plants fed-1 produced the highest RY and RSY in the two growing seasons. The results of the current study are crucial for sustainable and improved cultivation of sugar beet in Egypt.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing dates, planting densities and varieties, and their interactions, significantly affected sugar beet yield and quality parameters.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1 - Treatment
- sowing dates, planting densities and varietiese1
- Outcome
- yield and quality parameterse1
- Setting
- Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypte0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant and highly significant effects of sowing dates, planting densities and varieties as well as their interactions on the yield and quality parameters of sugar beet”
e0“The present study was carried out at the Agricultural Research Farm of the Delta sugar Company, El-Hamoul, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt”
Claim · model-written summary
Late cultivation of the Santoline variety on October 16 gave the highest root and recoverable sugar yields.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Material
- Santolinee2
- Treatment
- late cultivatione2
- Outcome
- root and recoverable sugar yieldse2
- Direction
- higheste2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The highest root and recoverable sugar yields were produced from the late cultivation of the variety Santoline on October 16”
e1“The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant and highly significant effects of sowing dates, planting densities and varieties as well as their interactions on the yield and quality parameters of sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Early cultivation of the Steel variety on August 17 at high planting density gave the highest sucrose content, RS% and Qz%.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Material
- Steele3
- Treatment
- Early cultivation of the Steel variety on August 17 at a high planting density (80,000 plants fed-1)e3
- Outcome
- sucrose content, RS% and Qz%e3
- Direction
- highest valuese3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Early cultivation of the Steel variety on August 17 at a high planting density (80,000 plants fed-1) produced the highest values of sucrose content, RS% and Qz%, but the lowest values of Na%, K%, α-amino-N% and SL% in the two growing seasons”
e1“The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant and highly significant effects of sowing dates, planting densities and varieties as well as their interactions on the yield and quality parameters of sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Early cultivation of the Steel variety on August 17 at high planting density gave the lowest Na%, K% and α-amino-N%.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Material
- Steele3
- Treatment
- Early cultivation of the Steel variety on August 17 at a high planting density (80,000 plants fed-1)e3
- Outcome
- Na%, K%, α-amino-N%e3
- Direction
- lowest valuese3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Early cultivation of the Steel variety on August 17 at a high planting density (80,000 plants fed-1) produced the highest values of sucrose content, RS% and Qz%, but the lowest values of Na%, K%, α-amino-N% and SL% in the two growing seasons”
e1“The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant and highly significant effects of sowing dates, planting densities and varieties as well as their interactions on the yield and quality parameters of sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Early cultivation of the Steel variety on August 17 at high planting density gave the lowest sugar loss (SL%).
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Material
- Steele3
- Treatment
- Early cultivation of the Steel variety on August 17 at a high planting density (80,000 plants fed-1)e3
- Outcome
- SL%e3
- Direction
- lowest valuese3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Early cultivation of the Steel variety on August 17 at a high planting density (80,000 plants fed-1) produced the highest values of sucrose content, RS% and Qz%, but the lowest values of Na%, K%, α-amino-N% and SL% in the two growing seasons”
e1“The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant and highly significant effects of sowing dates, planting densities and varieties as well as their interactions on the yield and quality parameters of sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Late sowing of the Santoline variety on October 16 at moderate-low density gave the highest root yield and recoverable sugar yield in both seasons.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise1
- Material
- Santolinee4
- Treatment
- late sowing of the Santoline variety on October 16 at a moderate-low planting density of 53,300 plants fed-1e4
- Outcome
- RY and RSYe4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Qualifier
- in the two growing seasonse4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“late sowing of the Santoline variety on October 16 at a moderate-low planting density of 53,300 plants fed-1 produced the highest RY and RSY in the two growing seasons”
e1“The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant and highly significant effects of sowing dates, planting densities and varieties as well as their interactions on the yield and quality parameters of sugar beet”
The same questions in other papers
density · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →sowing time · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →density · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.