Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out at the experimental farm of El-Minia University during 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 seasons to study the effect of sowing dates (20th Sep., 10th Oct. and 1st Nov.), hill spacing (15,20 and 25 cm.) and Potassium-rates (0,24 and 48kg K2O/fad.) as well as their interactions on yield, yield components and quality of sugar beet, c.v. Raspoly. The experimental design was split-split plot with three replications The main results could be summarized as follows. All characters for yield and its components and quality were significantly affected by sowing dates. Sowing beet plants on 10th Oct. gave the greatest values of root length, root diameter, root fresh weight, foliage fresh weight/plant, yields of root, top and sugar. as well as TSS% and sucrose% in both seasons, while purity % recorded adversely trend in both seasons. Sowing beet plants on 1st Nov. Produced the lowest averages from all traits, except purity % in the second season, while sowing beet plants on 20th Sept. gave the highest average of purity % in the first season and vice-versa in the second one. Hill spacing of 20 cm. gave the highest value of root length and diameter, foliage fresh weight, yields f top, root and sugar as well as TSS % and sucrose % in both seasons, while purity % resulted the lowest one in both seasons. On the other hand hill spacing of 15cm. between beet plants produced the lowest averages from this traits in both seasons, except root yield/ fad and TSS % where the lowest values from this traits resulted from hill spacing of 25 cm. between plants the greatest values of root fresh weight as well as juice purity % obtained from 25cm. between hills in both seasons. All characters significantly increased with increasing Potassium rate up to 48 kg K2O /fad except purity % in the two seasons. The interactions indicated that the highest yield from root and sugar /fad was obtained by sowing beet on 10th Oct. at 20th cm between hills with 48kg k2o/fad.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing date significantly affected all yield, yield component and quality characters of sugar beet.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEET
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- sowing datese1
- Outcome
- All characters for yield and its components and qualitye1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“All characters for yield and its components and quality were significantly affected by sowing dates”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 10 October gave the greatest root length, root diameter and root fresh weight.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Sowing beet plants on 10th Oct.e1
- Outcome
- root length, root diameter, root fresh weighte1
- Direction
- greatest valuese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Sowing beet plants on 10th Oct. gave the greatest values of root length, root diameter, root fresh weight, foliage fresh weight/plant, yields of root, top and sugar. as well as TSS% and sucrose% in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 10 October gave the greatest foliage fresh weight per plant and root and top yields.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Sowing beet plants on 10th Oct.e1
- Outcome
- foliage fresh weight/plant, yields of root, tope1
- Direction
- greatest valuese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Sowing beet plants on 10th Oct. gave the greatest values of root length, root diameter, root fresh weight, foliage fresh weight/plant, yields of root, top and sugar. as well as TSS% and sucrose% in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 10 October gave the greatest sugar yield.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Sowing beet plants on 10th Oct.e1
- Outcome
- sugare1
- Direction
- greatest valuese1
- Qualifier
- yields of root, top and sugare1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Sowing beet plants on 10th Oct. gave the greatest values of root length, root diameter, root fresh weight, foliage fresh weight/plant, yields of root, top and sugar. as well as TSS% and sucrose% in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 10 October gave the greatest TSS% and sucrose%.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Sowing beet plants on 10th Oct.e1
- Outcome
- TSS% and sucrose%e1
- Direction
- greatest valuese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Sowing beet plants on 10th Oct. gave the greatest values of root length, root diameter, root fresh weight, foliage fresh weight/plant, yields of root, top and sugar. as well as TSS% and sucrose% in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 10 October adversely affected juice purity %.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Sowing beet plants on 10th Oct.e1
- Outcome
- purity %e2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Sowing beet plants on 10th Oct. gave the greatest values of root length, root diameter, root fresh weight, foliage fresh weight/plant, yields of root, top and sugar. as well as TSS% and sucrose% in both seasons”
e2“while purity % recorded adversely trend in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 1 November gave the lowest averages for all traits except purity % in the second season.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Sowing beet plants on 1st Nov.e1
- Outcome
- all traitse1
- Direction
- lowest averagese1
- Qualifier
- except purity % in the second seasone1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Sowing beet plants on 1st Nov. Produced the lowest averages from all traits, except purity % in the second season”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing on 20 September gave the highest purity % in the first season, and the reverse in the second season.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- sowing beet plants on 20th Sept.e1
- Outcome
- purity %e1
- Direction
- highest averagee1
- Qualifier
- in the first seasone1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“sowing beet plants on 20th Sept. gave the highest average of purity % in the first season and vice-versa in the second one”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Hill spacing of 20 cm gave the highest root length and root diameter.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Hill spacing of 20 cm.e2
- Outcome
- root length and diametere2
- Direction
- highest valuee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Hill spacing of 20 cm. gave the highest value of root length and diameter, foliage fresh weight, yields f top, root and sugar as well as TSS % and sucrose % in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Hill spacing of 20 cm gave the highest foliage fresh weight, top yield and root yield.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Hill spacing of 20 cm.e2
- Outcome
- foliage fresh weight, yields f top, roote2
- Direction
- highest valuee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Hill spacing of 20 cm. gave the highest value of root length and diameter, foliage fresh weight, yields f top, root and sugar as well as TSS % and sucrose % in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Hill spacing of 20 cm gave the highest sugar yield, TSS% and sucrose%.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Hill spacing of 20 cm.e2
- Outcome
- sugar as well as TSS % and sucrose %e2
- Direction
- highest valuee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Hill spacing of 20 cm. gave the highest value of root length and diameter, foliage fresh weight, yields f top, root and sugar as well as TSS % and sucrose % in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Hill spacing of 15 cm gave the lowest averages for the traits, except root yield and TSS%.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- hill spacing of 15cm.e3
- Outcome
- this traitse3
- Direction
- lowest averagese3
- Qualifier
- except root yield/ fad and TSS %e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“hill spacing of 15cm. between beet plants produced the lowest averages from this traits in both seasons, except root yield/ fad and TSS %”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Hill spacing of 25 cm gave the lowest root yield and TSS%.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- hill spacing of 25 cm.e4
- Outcome
- root yield/ fad and TSS %e4
- Direction
- lowest valuese4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“root yield/ fad and TSS % where the lowest values from this traits resulted from hill spacing of 25 cm. between plants”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Hill spacing of 25 cm gave the greatest root fresh weight and juice purity %.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 25cm. between hillse5
- Outcome
- root fresh weight as well as juice purity %e5
- Direction
- greatest valuese5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“the greatest values of root fresh weight as well as juice purity % obtained from 25cm. between hills in both seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
All characters significantly increased with increasing potassium rate up to 48 kg K2O/fad, except purity %.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Potassium rate up to 48 kg K2O /fade6
- Outcome
- All characterse6
- Direction
- increasede6
- Qualifier
- except purity % in the two seasonse6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“All characters significantly increased with increasing Potassium rate up to 48 kg K2O /fad except purity % in the two seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction of sowing on 10 October at 20 cm spacing with 48 kg K2O/fad gave the highest root and sugar yield per fad.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- sowing beet on 10th Oct. at 20th cm between hills with 48kg k2o/fade7
- Outcome
- yield from root and sugar /fade7
- Direction
- higheste7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“The interactions indicated that the highest yield from root and sugar /fad was obtained by sowing beet on 10th Oct. at 20th cm between hills with 48kg k2o/fad”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
The same questions in other papers
potassium · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
54 papers more in this group
See all 58 papers →density · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →density · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →density · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
19 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.