Abstract
The aim of this research is to study the influence of sowing models (one side of ridges, 60 cm apart, 15 cm between hills and both sides of terraces, 90 cm apart, 20 cm between hills), nitrogen fertilizer levels (70, 90 and 110 kg N/fad.) and biofertilization treatments (treate soil with Cerialin, Rhizobacterin and the mixture of Cerialin and Rhizobacterin) on yield and quality of sugar beet, Karam cultivar under sandy soil conditions. Two field experiment were carried out at Kalabsho Experimental Farm, Dakahlia Governorate, Sugar Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt, during 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 seasons. The experiments were carried out in split-split plot design with four replications. The main plots were assigned to sowing models. The sub-plots were occupied with nitrogen fertilizer levels. While, the sub-sub plots were allocated with biofertilization treatments. The obtained results showed that sowing sugar beet in both sides of terraces, 90 cm apart, at 20 cm between hills attained the highest values of yield components, most of root juice quality parameters and yields, followed by sowing in one side of ridges, 60 cm apart, at 15 cm between hills in both seasons. The highest value for each of yield components, most of root juice quality parameters and yields were produced from fertilizing beet plants with 110 kg N/fad in both seasons. However, application of 90 kg N/fad., induced the highest value of sugar yield and the second best value for each of yield components, root juice quality parameters, top and root yields without significant differences between them in most cases in both growing seasons. Application the mixture of Cerialin and Rhizobacterin produced the highest value for each of yield components, most of root juice quality parameters and yields in the two seasons. It can be concluded that sowing sugar beet in both sides of terraces, 90 cm apart, at 20 cm between hills and treat soil with the mixture of Cerialin + Rhizobacterin (225 g/fad., of each) biofertilizers in addition of mineral fertilizing with 90 kg N/fad., to improve productivity and quality of sugar beet under sandy soil conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Terrace sowing produced the highest yield components, root juice quality parameters and yields.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- sowing sugar beet in both sides of terraces, 90 cm apart, at 20 cm between hillse0
- Outcome
- yield components, most of root juice quality parameters and yieldse0
- Direction
- highest valuese0
- Qualifier
- both seasonse0
- Comparator
- sowing in one side of ridges, 60 cm apart, at 15 cm between hillse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sowing sugar beet in both sides of terraces, 90 cm apart, at 20 cm between hills attained the highest values of yield components, most of root juice quality parameters and yields, followed by sowing in one side of ridges, 60 cm apart, at 15 cm between hills in both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizing with 110 kg N/fad produced the highest yield components, quality parameters and yields.
- Taxon
- beet plants
Beta vulgarise0 - Treatment
- 110 kg N/fade0
- Outcome
- yield components, most of root juice quality parameters and yieldse0
- Direction
- highest valuee0
- Qualifier
- both seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest value for each of yield components, most of root juice quality parameters and yields were produced from fertilizing beet plants with 110 kg N/fad in both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 90 kg N/fad gave the highest sugar yield.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 90 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- sugar yielde0
- Direction
- highest valuee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 90 kg N/fad., induced the highest value of sugar yield”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying 90 kg N/fad gave second best yield components, root juice quality parameters, top and root yields, usually without significant differences.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 90 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- yield components, root juice quality parameters, top and root yieldse0
- Direction
- second best valuee0
- Qualifier
- in most cases in both growing seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 90 kg N/fad., induced the highest value of sugar yield and the second best value for each of yield components, root juice quality parameters, top and root yields without significant differences between them in most cases in both growing seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
The Cerialin and Rhizobacterin mixture produced the highest yield components, juice quality parameters and yields.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- the mixture of Cerialin and Rhizobacterine0
- Outcome
- yield components, most of root juice quality parameters and yieldse0
- Direction
- highest valuee0
- Qualifier
- in the two seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application the mixture of Cerialin and Rhizobacterin produced the highest value for each of yield components, most of root juice quality parameters and yields in the two seasons”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
The same questions in other papers
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- positive
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →nitrogen · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.