Paper · 2020 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Impact of Foliar Spraying of some Potassium Sources and Boron Levels on Sugar Beet Quantity and Quality

M. Ibrahim; Riham Faiyad; I. El-Gamal

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during the two successive winter seasons of 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 at Tag Al-Ezz Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt to study the effect of foliar spraying of some potassium sources i.e. potassium silicate at 4ml L-1, potassium humate at 4ml L-1 and a mixture of them as main plots and foliar spraying with four levels of boron (0.0, 100, 150 and 200 mgL-1) as sub plots as well as their interactions on nutrients concentrations, yield components, quality characters and yield of sugar beet (Beta valgaris var. saccharifera L. Faten variety). The experimental design was split-plot design system. Spraying sugar beet plants with a mixture of K-Silicate and K-Humate produced the highest values of all studied parameters i.e. NPK concentrations, yield components, quality characteristics and yields followed by spraying with K- Humate, then spraying with K- Silicate and control in a descending order, with exception juice purity that had inverse trend in both seasons. Spraying sugar beet plants with a solution of boron at a rate of 100 mgL-1 was more effective than other studied boron levels in increasing nutrients concentrations, yield components, quality characters and yields and gave the highest values of them during both seasons. It can be concluded that maximum sugar beet nutrients concentrations, yield components, quality characters and yields were significantly affected by the interactions between the foliar spraying of K-Silicate+K-Humate mixture and boron at a rate of 100 mgL-1 under the environmental conditions of Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying sugar beet with the K-silicate and K-humate mixture gave the highest NPK concentrations compared with the control.

Treatment
Spraying sugar beet plants with a mixture of K-Silicate and K-Humatee1
Outcome
NPK concentrationse1
Direction
highest valuese1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Spraying sugar beet plants with a mixture of K-Silicate and K-Humate produced the highest values of all studied parameters i.e. NPK concentrations, yield components, quality characteristics and yields followed by spraying with K- Humate, then spraying with K- Silicate and control in a descending order, with exception juice purity that had inverse trend in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The K-silicate and K-humate mixture gave the highest yield components and quality characteristics compared with the control.

Treatment
Spraying sugar beet plants with a mixture of K-Silicate and K-Humatee1
Outcome
yield components, quality characteristicse1
Direction
highest valuese1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Spraying sugar beet plants with a mixture of K-Silicate and K-Humate produced the highest values of all studied parameters i.e. NPK concentrations, yield components, quality characteristics and yields followed by spraying with K- Humate, then spraying with K- Silicate and control in a descending order, with exception juice purity that had inverse trend in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The K-silicate and K-humate mixture gave the highest sugar beet yields compared with the control.

Treatment
Spraying sugar beet plants with a mixture of K-Silicate and K-Humatee1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
highest valuese1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Spraying sugar beet plants with a mixture of K-Silicate and K-Humate produced the highest values of all studied parameters i.e. NPK concentrations, yield components, quality characteristics and yields followed by spraying with K- Humate, then spraying with K- Silicate and control in a descending order, with exception juice purity that had inverse trend in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The K-silicate and K-humate mixture gave an inverse trend in juice purity compared with the control.

Treatment
Spraying sugar beet plants with a mixture of K-Silicate and K-Humatee1
Outcome
juice puritye1
Direction
inverse trende1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Spraying sugar beet plants with a mixture of K-Silicate and K-Humate produced the highest values of all studied parameters i.e. NPK concentrations, yield components, quality characteristics and yields followed by spraying with K- Humate, then spraying with K- Silicate and control in a descending order, with exception juice purity that had inverse trend in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A boron spray of 100 mg/L increased sugar beet nutrient concentrations more than other boron levels.

Treatment
Spraying sugar beet plants with a solution of boron at a rate of 100 mgL-1e3
Outcome
nutrients concentrationse3
Direction
increasinge3
Comparator
other studied boron levelse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Spraying sugar beet plants with a solution of boron at a rate of 100 mgL-1 was more effective than other studied boron levels in increasing nutrients concentrations, yield components, quality characters and yields and gave the highest values of them during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A boron spray of 100 mg/L increased sugar beet yield components, quality characters and yields more than other boron levels.

Treatment
Spraying sugar beet plants with a solution of boron at a rate of 100 mgL-1e3
Outcome
yield components, quality characters and yieldse3
Direction
increasinge3
Qualifier
gave the highest values of them during both seasonse3
Comparator
other studied boron levelse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Spraying sugar beet plants with a solution of boron at a rate of 100 mgL-1 was more effective than other studied boron levels in increasing nutrients concentrations, yield components, quality characters and yields and gave the highest values of them during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1329 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of K-silicate+K-humate spraying with boron at 100 mg/L significantly affected sugar beet nutrients, yield components and quality characters.

Treatment
the interactions between the foliar spraying of K-Silicate+K-Humate mixture and boron at a rate of 100 mgL-1e4
Outcome
nutrients concentrations, yield components, quality characterse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“maximum sugar beet nutrients concentrations, yield components, quality characters and yields were significantly affected by the interactions between the foliar spraying of K-Silicate+K-Humate mixture and boron at a rate of 100 mgL-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1588 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of K-silicate+K-humate spraying with boron at 100 mg/L significantly affected sugar beet yield.

Treatment
the interactions between the foliar spraying of K-Silicate+K-Humate mixture and boron at a rate of 100 mgL-1e4
Outcome
yieldse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“maximum sugar beet nutrients concentrations, yield components, quality characters and yields were significantly affected by the interactions between the foliar spraying of K-Silicate+K-Humate mixture and boron at a rate of 100 mgL-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying with K-humate ranked above K-silicate and control for all studied parameters.

Treatment
spraying with K- Humatee1
Outcome
all studied parameterse1
Direction
followed bye1
Comparator
K- Silicate and controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Spraying sugar beet plants with a mixture of K-Silicate and K-Humate produced the highest values of all studied parameters i.e. NPK concentrations, yield components, quality characteristics and yields followed by spraying with K- Humate, then spraying with K- Silicate and control in a descending order, with exception juice purity that had inverse trend in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–1058 · show in text ↑

boron atom · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

boron atom · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 39 positive, 3 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

application · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.