Abstract
Boron deficiency is considered to be a limiting factor in plant production in many parts of the world. A field study was conducted to determine the current nutritional status of sugar beets in the Kahramanmaraş-Elbistan region in the 2016–2017 season. Due to the results of the field study indicating the lack of soil and plant boron, field trials were conducted between 2017 and 2019 to determine the effect of boron on the yield and quality of sugar beet. In the results of the field studies, it was determined that more than 85% and 75% of the soil and plant samples, respectively, contain boron below the critical limits. A significant positive relationship was determined between the total boron content of the plants and the available boron content of the soils and it was calculated as r = 0.7611*** (y = 57.3703x + 29.0349). According to the results of the field trials of two years, sugar beet responded significantly to the application of boron from the soil. While sugar beet root yield and purified sugar yield increased statistically significantly, the increase in the presence of sugar and the presence of refined sugar was not found to be significant. Boron application did not affect the content of sugar beet root potassium sodium and harmful nitrogen content. Increase in purified sugar yield; 13.2% at 150 g da−1 boron level, 14.5% at 300 g da−1 level, 18.7% at 450 g da−1 boron level, and 13.4% at 600 g da−1 boron level.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
More than 85% of the soil samples contained boron below the critical limits.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- boron below the critical limitse1
- Value
- more than 85%e1
- Qualifier
- soile1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e1“it was determined that more than 85% and 75% of the soil and plant samples, respectively, contain boron below the critical limits”
Claim · model-written summary
More than 75% of the plant samples contained boron below the critical limits.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- boron below the critical limitse1
- Value
- 75%e1
- Qualifier
- plante1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e1“it was determined that more than 85% and 75% of the soil and plant samples, respectively, contain boron below the critical limits”
Claim · model-written summary
Total boron content of sugar beet plants was significantly positively related to available boron content of the soils.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Outcome
- total boron content of the plantse2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Value
- r = 0.7611***e2
- Comparator
- available boron content of the soilse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e2“A significant positive relationship was determined between the total boron content of the plants and the available boron content of the soils and it was calculated as r = 0.7611*** (y = 57.3703x + 29.0349)”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron application from the soil significantly increased sugar beet root yield and purified sugar yield.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- application of boron from the soile3
- Outcome
- root yield and purified sugar yielde3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Setting
- Kahramanmaraş-Elbistan regione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“A field study was conducted to determine the current nutritional status of sugar beets in the Kahramanmaraş-Elbistan region”
e3“sugar beet responded significantly to the application of boron from the soil. While sugar beet root yield and purified sugar yield increased statistically significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron application did not significantly increase the presence of sugar or refined sugar in sugar beet.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- application of boron from the soile3
- Outcome
- the presence of sugar and the presence of refined sugare4
- Direction
- increasee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e3“sugar beet responded significantly to the application of boron from the soil. While sugar beet root yield and purified sugar yield increased statistically significantly”
e4“the increase in the presence of sugar and the presence of refined sugar was not found to be significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron application did not affect potassium, sodium or harmful nitrogen content of sugar beet roots.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Boron applicatione5
- Outcome
- the content of sugar beet root potassium sodium and harmful nitrogen contente5
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e5“Boron application did not affect the content of sugar beet root potassium sodium and harmful nitrogen content”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron at 150 g da−1 increased purified sugar yield by 13.2%.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- 150 g da−1 boron levele6
- Outcome
- purified sugar yielde6
- Direction
- Increasee6
- Value
- 13.2%e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e6“Increase in purified sugar yield; 13.2% at 150 g da−1 boron level, 14.5% at 300 g da−1 level, 18.7% at 450 g da−1 boron level, and 13.4% at 600 g da−1 boron level”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron at 300 g da−1 increased purified sugar yield by 14.5%.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- 300 g da−1 levele6
- Outcome
- purified sugar yielde6
- Direction
- Increasee6
- Value
- 14.5%e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e6“Increase in purified sugar yield; 13.2% at 150 g da−1 boron level, 14.5% at 300 g da−1 level, 18.7% at 450 g da−1 boron level, and 13.4% at 600 g da−1 boron level”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron at 450 g da−1 increased purified sugar yield by 18.7%.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- 450 g da−1 boron levele6
- Outcome
- purified sugar yielde6
- Direction
- Increasee6
- Value
- 18.7%e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e6“Increase in purified sugar yield; 13.2% at 150 g da−1 boron level, 14.5% at 300 g da−1 level, 18.7% at 450 g da−1 boron level, and 13.4% at 600 g da−1 boron level”
Claim · model-written summary
Boron at 600 g da−1 increased purified sugar yield by 13.4%.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- 600 g da−1 boron levele6
- Outcome
- purified sugar yielde6
- Direction
- Increasee6
- Value
- 13.4%e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e6“Increase in purified sugar yield; 13.2% at 150 g da−1 boron level, 14.5% at 300 g da−1 level, 18.7% at 450 g da−1 boron level, and 13.4% at 600 g da−1 boron level”
The same questions in other papers
boron atom · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →boron atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.