boron atom · Nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)
17 claims from these papers; 3 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Micronutrients through foliar application enhance growth, yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgarisL.) (2020)
increaseBoron foliar application significantly increased N, P, K, Ca and Mg content in sugar beet leaves and roots.
Diagnosis of Boron Deficiency and Effects of Boron on Yield and Quality Values of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Grown in Elbistan District (2022)no changeBoron application did not affect potassium, sodium or harmful nitrogen content of sugar beet roots.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
3 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 14
- positive
- positive
PRODUCTIVITY AND NPK UPTAKE OF SUGAR BEET AS INFLUENCED BY N, B AND Mn FERTILIZATION · 2002
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Boron Level and Time of Application on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet · 2017
- positive
IMPROVEMENT OF YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET SOWN AT TWO DATES BY METHANOL AND BORON APPLICATION · 2017
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
IMPACT OF ZEOLITE AND BORON ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET IN BORG EL-ARAB REGION · 2024
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2
- negative
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.
boron atom on Beta vulgaris (beet) against other targets
boron atom · nutrient: content on other organisms
- Zea mays (maize)
- Glycine max (soybean)
- Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)
- Brassica napus (oilseed rape)
- Triticum aestivum (wheat)
- Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)
- Oryza sativa (rice)
- Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)
- Malus domestica (apple)
- Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)
- Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
- Olea europaea (common olive)