Paper · 2024 · Menoufia Journal of Plant Production

IMPACT OF ZEOLITE AND BORON ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET IN BORG EL-ARAB REGION

elaraby salim; ebrahim abdelbaky; amira el moghazy

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field trials were conducted on a private farm in El Gharbaniat, Borg El-Arab (latitude 30°55 N and longitude 29°32 E), Alexandria Governorate, Egypt, in 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 to investigate the influence of zeolite and foliar application with boron on the yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) grown in calcareous soil conditions. The study included twelve treatments that combined four zeolite doses (0, 250, 450, and 650 kg fed-1) and three boron levels applied as boric acid 17% boron (0, 100, and 200 ppm) sprayed at 60 and 80 days after sowing, utilizing a randomized block design in a split-plot arrangement with three replicates. The results revealed that increasing the zeolite level to 650 kg fed-1 markedly improved the leaf area index (LAI), relative growth rate (RGR), root fresh weight (RFW), diameter, number of roots fed-1, sucrose percent, quality index, root and sugar yields fed-1 (ton) in both seasons. The extracted sugar percentage increased in the first season but remained unaffected in the second one. Applying 200 ppm boron resulted in the highest values for LAI, RGR, root diameter, fresh weight, sucrose, and extracted sugar (ES %) percentages, root and sugar yields/fed, while the sugar lost to molasses % (SLM %), K and Na contents decreased. It is recommended that sugar beets be grown in calcareous sandy soil mixed with 650 kg/fed zeolite and that 200 ppm boron foliar spray be applied to maximize root and sugar yields and reduce root impurities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing zeolite to 650 kg fed-1 improved leaf area index (LAI), relative growth rate (RGR).

Treatment
zeolite level to 650 kg fed-1e0
Outcome
leaf area index (LAI), relative growth rate (RGR)e0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that increasing the zeolite level to 650 kg fed-1 markedly improved the leaf area index (LAI), relative growth rate (RGR), root fresh weight (RFW), diameter, number of roots fed-1, sucrose percent, quality index, root and sugar yields fed-1 (ton) in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing zeolite to 650 kg fed-1 improved root fresh weight (RFW), diameter, number of roots fed-1.

Treatment
zeolite level to 650 kg fed-1e0
Outcome
root fresh weight (RFW), diameter, number of roots fed-1e0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that increasing the zeolite level to 650 kg fed-1 markedly improved the leaf area index (LAI), relative growth rate (RGR), root fresh weight (RFW), diameter, number of roots fed-1, sucrose percent, quality index, root and sugar yields fed-1 (ton) in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing zeolite to 650 kg fed-1 improved sucrose percent, quality index.

Treatment
zeolite level to 650 kg fed-1e0
Outcome
sucrose percent, quality indexe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that increasing the zeolite level to 650 kg fed-1 markedly improved the leaf area index (LAI), relative growth rate (RGR), root fresh weight (RFW), diameter, number of roots fed-1, sucrose percent, quality index, root and sugar yields fed-1 (ton) in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing zeolite to 650 kg fed-1 improved root and sugar yields fed-1 (ton).

Treatment
zeolite level to 650 kg fed-1e0
Outcome
root and sugar yields fed-1 (ton)e0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that increasing the zeolite level to 650 kg fed-1 markedly improved the leaf area index (LAI), relative growth rate (RGR), root fresh weight (RFW), diameter, number of roots fed-1, sucrose percent, quality index, root and sugar yields fed-1 (ton) in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracted sugar percentage increased in the first season.

Treatment
zeolitet0
Outcome
extracted sugar percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
first seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extracted sugar percentage increased in the first season but remained unaffected in the second one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“ZEOLITE AND BORON ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracted sugar percentage was unaffected in the second season.

Treatment
zeolitet0
Outcome
extracted sugar percentagee0
Direction
remained unaffectede0
Qualifier
second onee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extracted sugar percentage increased in the first season but remained unaffected in the second one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“ZEOLITE AND BORON ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 200 ppm boron gave the highest LAI, RGR.

Treatment
200 ppm borone0
Outcome
LAI, RGRe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 200 ppm boron resulted in the highest values for LAI, RGR, root diameter, fresh weight, sucrose, and extracted sugar (ES %) percentages, root and sugar yields/fed, while the sugar lost to molasses % (SLM %), K and Na contents decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 200 ppm boron gave the highest root diameter, fresh weight.

Treatment
200 ppm borone0
Outcome
root diameter, fresh weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 200 ppm boron resulted in the highest values for LAI, RGR, root diameter, fresh weight, sucrose, and extracted sugar (ES %) percentages, root and sugar yields/fed, while the sugar lost to molasses % (SLM %), K and Na contents decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 200 ppm boron gave the highest sucrose, and extracted sugar (ES %) percentages.

Treatment
200 ppm borone0
Outcome
sucrose, and extracted sugar (ES %) percentagese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 200 ppm boron resulted in the highest values for LAI, RGR, root diameter, fresh weight, sucrose, and extracted sugar (ES %) percentages, root and sugar yields/fed, while the sugar lost to molasses % (SLM %), K and Na contents decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 200 ppm boron gave the highest root and sugar yields/fed.

Treatment
200 ppm borone0
Outcome
root and sugar yields/fede0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 200 ppm boron resulted in the highest values for LAI, RGR, root diameter, fresh weight, sucrose, and extracted sugar (ES %) percentages, root and sugar yields/fed, while the sugar lost to molasses % (SLM %), K and Na contents decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 200 ppm boron decreased sugar lost to molasses % (SLM %).

Treatment
200 ppm borone0
Outcome
sugar lost to molasses % (SLM %)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 200 ppm boron resulted in the highest values for LAI, RGR, root diameter, fresh weight, sucrose, and extracted sugar (ES %) percentages, root and sugar yields/fed, while the sugar lost to molasses % (SLM %), K and Na contents decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 200 ppm boron decreased K and Na contents.

Treatment
200 ppm borone0
Outcome
K and Na contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 200 ppm boron resulted in the highest values for LAI, RGR, root diameter, fresh weight, sucrose, and extracted sugar (ES %) percentages, root and sugar yields/fed, while the sugar lost to molasses % (SLM %), K and Na contents decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 52–62 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 650 kg/fed zeolite and 200 ppm boron spray to maximize yields and reduce impurities.

Treatment
650 kg/fed zeolitee0
Outcome
maximize root and sugar yields and reduce root impuritiese0
Setting
calcareous sandy soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is recommended that sugar beets be grown in calcareous sandy soil mixed with 650 kg/fed zeolite and that 200 ppm boron foliar spray be applied to maximize root and sugar yields and reduce root impurities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1517 · show in text ↑

boron atom · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

boron atom · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

boron atom · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

boron atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

35 papers: 30 positive, 5 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

other · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

other · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

other · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.