Abstract
Abstract Application of 11.2 kg B/ha and/or of 224 kg N/ha reduced the number of table beet (Beta vulgarisL. cv Detroit Dark Red) roots with B deficiency compared to low rates or no N or B application in three field experiments. In two of the three experiments, the 224 kg/ha N rate decreased B concentration in leaves when no B was added yet B deficiency of roots was reduced compared to the 56 kg/ha N rate. B application increased B concentration in leaves. Calcium concentration in leaves was higher at 224 kg N/ha than for 56 kg N/ha. Nitrogen concentration in leaves was increased by increasing the rate of N while K concentration was decreased at the higher N rate. Average number of roots with B deficiency was significantly higher for the Morse strain than for the Harris strain of ‘Detroit Dark Red’ in one experiment where the two strains were compared. There were no differences between the two strains in leaf B concentration but Ca concentration was higher in the Morse strain than for the Harris strain. Yields were higher at the 224 kg/ha rate of N than at 56 kg N/ha but were not consistently affected by B and K applications. There was no clear relationship of leaf N, Ca and K concentrations to B deficiency of roots Notes Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Paper No. 3540.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
B application reduced the number of beet roots with B deficiency.
- Taxon
- table beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- 11.2 kg B/hae0
- Outcome
- roots with B deficiencye0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- low rates or no N or B applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 11.2 kg B/ha and/or of 224 kg N/ha reduced the number of table beet (Beta vulgarisL. cv Detroit Dark Red) roots with B deficiency compared to low rates or no N or B application”
Claim · model-written summary
High N application reduced the number of beet roots with B deficiency.
- Taxon
- table beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- 224 kg N/hae0
- Outcome
- roots with B deficiencye0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- low rates or no N or B applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 11.2 kg B/ha and/or of 224 kg N/ha reduced the number of table beet (Beta vulgarisL. cv Detroit Dark Red) roots with B deficiency compared to low rates or no N or B application”
Claim · model-written summary
At no added B, the 224 kg/ha N rate decreased leaf B concentration versus 56 kg/ha N.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 224 kg/ha N ratee0
- Outcome
- B concentration in leavese0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- when no B was addede0
- Comparator
- 56 kg/ha N ratee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“the 224 kg/ha N rate decreased B concentration in leaves when no B was added yet B deficiency of roots was reduced compared to the 56 kg/ha N rate”
Claim · model-written summary
At no added B, 224 kg/ha N reduced root B deficiency versus 56 kg/ha N.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 224 kg/ha N ratee0
- Outcome
- B deficiency of rootse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- when no B was addede0
- Comparator
- 56 kg/ha N ratee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“the 224 kg/ha N rate decreased B concentration in leaves when no B was added yet B deficiency of roots was reduced compared to the 56 kg/ha N rate”
Claim · model-written summary
B application increased leaf B concentration.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- B applicatione0
- Outcome
- B concentration in leavese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“B application increased B concentration in leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf calcium concentration was higher at 224 than 56 kg N/ha.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 224 kg N/hae0
- Outcome
- Calcium concentration in leavese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 56 kg N/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“Calcium concentration in leaves was higher at 224 kg N/ha than for 56 kg N/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf nitrogen concentration increased as N rate increased.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- rate of Ne0
- Outcome
- Nitrogen concentration in leavese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“Nitrogen concentration in leaves was increased by increasing the rate of N”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf K concentration decreased at the higher N rate.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- higher N ratee0
- Outcome
- K concentratione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“K concentration was decreased at the higher N rate”
Claim · model-written summary
Morse strain had significantly more B-deficient roots than Harris strain in one experiment.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Morse straine0
- Outcome
- number of roots with B deficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- in one experimente0
- Comparator
- Harris straine0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“Average number of roots with B deficiency was significantly higher for the Morse strain than for the Harris strain of ‘Detroit Dark Red’ in one experiment”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf B concentration did not differ between Morse and Harris strains.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Morse straine1
- Outcome
- leaf B concentratione0
- Direction
- no differencese0
- Comparator
- Harris straine1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“There were no differences between the two strains in leaf B concentration”
e1“Average number of roots with B deficiency was significantly higher for the Morse strain than for the Harris strain”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf Ca concentration was higher in Morse than Harris strain.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Material
- Morse straine0
- Outcome
- Ca concentratione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- Harris straine0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“Ca concentration was higher in the Morse strain than for the Harris strain”
Claim · model-written summary
Beet yields were higher with 224 versus 56 kg N/ha.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 224 kg/ha rate of Ne0
- Outcome
- Yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 56 kg N/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“Yields were higher at the 224 kg/ha rate of N than at 56 kg N/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
B application did not consistently affect beet yield.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Be0
- Outcome
- Yieldse0
- Direction
- not consistently affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“Yields were higher at the 224 kg/ha rate of N than at 56 kg N/ha but were not consistently affected by B and K applications”
Claim · model-written summary
K application did not consistently affect beet yield.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- K applicationse0
- Outcome
- Yieldse0
- Direction
- not consistently affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“Yields were higher at the 224 kg/ha rate of N than at 56 kg N/ha but were not consistently affected by B and K applications”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf N, Ca, and K concentrations had no clear relationship with root B deficiency.
- Taxon
- table beetsBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Organ / stage
- leafe0
- Outcome
- B deficiency of rootse0
- Direction
- no clear relationshipe0
- Qualifier
- N, Ca and K concentrationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”
e0“There was no clear relationship of leaf N, Ca and K concentrations to B deficiency of roots”
The same questions in other papers
boron atom · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.