Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At no added B, the 224 kg/ha N rate decreased leaf B concentration versus 56 kg/ha N.

A claim from Effects of nitrogen, boron and potassium on boron deficiency, leaf mineral concentrations, and yield of table beets (Beta vulgaris L.) · 1989

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At no added B, the 224 kg/ha N rate decreased leaf B concentration versus 56 kg/ha N.

Treatment
224 kg/ha N ratee0
Outcome
B concentration in leavese0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
when no B was addede0
Comparator
56 kg/ha N ratee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–134
e0

“the 224 kg/ha N rate decreased B concentration in leaves when no B was added yet B deficiency of roots was reduced compared to the 56 kg/ha N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–408

Title

Effects of nitrogen, boron and potassium on boron deficiency, leaf mineral concentrations, and yield of table beets (Beta vulgaris L.)

Harry J. Mack Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 1989. doi:10.1080/00103628909368083

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-eb95cfe38ed11b0ab922eb369f4d782f42034cb131b51b4598bab40185daeb93 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.