Paper · 2010 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

RESPONSE OF SUGAR BEET TO NITROGEN FERTILIZER AND SULPHUR SPRAY FREQUENCY IN MIDDLE EGYPT

MAHMOUD S. H. OSMAN; MONA M. SHEHATA

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried cut in 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 seasons at Malawi Agricultural Experimental Research Station El Minia Governorate to study the effect of nitrogen soil fertilization level (60. 90 and 120 kg N/fed) and foliar fertilization of sulphur in the form of Calciume Poly Sulfide (30%) at concentration of 6 orn/L. which was applied (once at 70 days age, twice at 70 and 85 days as well as three times at 70, 85 and 90 days after sowing in addition to foliar spray with distilled water as control) on sugar beet Desperiz Poly N variety. The results indicated that: Increasing nitrogen level up to 120 Kg/fed significantly increased growth of sugar beet root measurements (length, diameter and fresh weight) and its content from N, P, K, SO., and all amino acids (except cystein which increased more by 90 kg N/fed) as well as yield of roots. However fertilization sugar beet plants by 90 kg N/fed significantly increased root quaky percentages (total soluble solids, sucrose and purity) in addition it gave the highest sugar yield (ton/fed). Foliar spray with sulphur solution twice or three times significantly increased d'ameter, fresh weight, yield of root and accumulation N, P, K, SO.,. while, some amino acids were increased and others were decreased in sugar beet root. Sulphur fertilization significantly decreased root quality measurements and it have insignificant effect on sugar yield. Fertilization sugar beet by 90 Kg N/F in combination with sulphur foliar spray three times during growing season obtained the greatest Increases in root and sugar yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen to 120 kg/fed significantly increased sugar beet root growth.

Material
Desperiz Poly Ne1
Treatment
nitrogen level up to 120 Kg/fede2
Outcome
growth of sugar beet root measurementse2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
Malawi Agricultural Experimental Research Station El Minia Governoratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried cut in 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 seasons at Malawi Agricultural Experimental Research Station El Minia Governorate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“on sugar beet Desperiz Poly N variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–559 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increasing nitrogen level up to 120 Kg/fed significantly increased growth of sugar beet root measurements (length, diameter and fresh weight) and its content from N, P, K, SO., and all amino acids (except cystein which increased more by 90 kg N/fed) as well as yield of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen to 120 kg/fed significantly increased the content of N, P, K, SO and amino acids in sugar beet roots.

Treatment
nitrogen level up to 120 Kg/fede2
Outcome
content from N, P, K, SOe2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on sugar beet Desperiz Poly N variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–559 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increasing nitrogen level up to 120 Kg/fed significantly increased growth of sugar beet root measurements (length, diameter and fresh weight) and its content from N, P, K, SO., and all amino acids (except cystein which increased more by 90 kg N/fed) as well as yield of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen to 120 kg/fed significantly increased sugar beet root yield.

Treatment
nitrogen level up to 120 Kg/fede2
Outcome
yield of rootse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on sugar beet Desperiz Poly N variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–559 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increasing nitrogen level up to 120 Kg/fed significantly increased growth of sugar beet root measurements (length, diameter and fresh weight) and its content from N, P, K, SO., and all amino acids (except cystein which increased more by 90 kg N/fed) as well as yield of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization with 90 kg N/fed significantly increased root quality percentages (total soluble solids, sucrose and purity).

Treatment
90 kg N/fede3
Outcome
root quaky percentagese3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
total soluble solids, sucrose and puritye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on sugar beet Desperiz Poly N variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–559 · show in text ↑
e3

“fertilization sugar beet plants by 90 kg N/fed significantly increased root quaky percentages (total soluble solids, sucrose and purity) in addition it gave the highest sugar yield (ton/fed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization with 90 kg N/fed gave the highest sugar yield.

Treatment
90 kg N/fede3
Outcome
sugar yielde3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on sugar beet Desperiz Poly N variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–559 · show in text ↑
e3

“fertilization sugar beet plants by 90 kg N/fed significantly increased root quaky percentages (total soluble solids, sucrose and purity) in addition it gave the highest sugar yield (ton/fed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sulphur spray twice or three times significantly increased root diameter, fresh weight and root yield.

Treatment
Foliar spray with sulphur solution twice or three timese4
Outcome
d'ameter, fresh weight, yield of roote4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on sugar beet Desperiz Poly N variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–559 · show in text ↑
e4

“Foliar spray with sulphur solution twice or three times significantly increased d'ameter, fresh weight, yield of root and accumulation N, P, K, SO.,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sulphur spray twice or three times significantly increased N, P, K and SO accumulation in sugar beet.

Treatment
Foliar spray with sulphur solution twice or three timese4
Outcome
accumulation N, P, K, SOe4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on sugar beet Desperiz Poly N variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–559 · show in text ↑
e4

“Foliar spray with sulphur solution twice or three times significantly increased d'ameter, fresh weight, yield of root and accumulation N, P, K, SO.,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilization significantly decreased root quality measurements.

Treatment
Sulphur fertilizatione5
Outcome
root quality measurementse5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on sugar beet Desperiz Poly N variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–559 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sulphur fertilization significantly decreased root quality measurements and it have insignificant effect on sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilization had an insignificant effect on sugar yield.

Treatment
Sulphur fertilizatione5
Outcome
sugar yielde5
Direction
insignificant effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on sugar beet Desperiz Poly N variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–559 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sulphur fertilization significantly decreased root quality measurements and it have insignificant effect on sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

90 kg N/fed combined with three sulphur foliar sprays gave the greatest increases in root and sugar yield.

Treatment
90 Kg N/F in combination with sulphur foliar spray three timese6
Outcome
root and sugar yielde6
Direction
greatest Increasese6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“on sugar beet Desperiz Poly N variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–559 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fertilization sugar beet by 90 Kg N/F in combination with sulphur foliar spray three times during growing season obtained the greatest Increases in root and sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1590 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.