Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Placement of nitrogen had a greater influence on uptake of fertilizer phosphorus by sugar beets than placement of phosphorus.

A claim from ABSORPTION OF FERTILIZER PHOSPHORUS BY SUGAR BEETS AS INFLUENCED BY PLACEMENT OF PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN · 1960

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Placement of nitrogen had a greater influence on uptake of fertilizer phosphorus by sugar beets than placement of phosphorus.

Treatment
placement of nitrogene1
Outcome
uptake of fertilizer phosphoruse1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
placement of phosphoruse1
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse study was conducted to determine the effects of placement of phosphorus and nitrogen on absorption of fertilizer phosphorus by sugar beets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–151
e1

“The placement of nitrogen had a greater influence on the uptake of fertilizer phosphorus than did the placement of phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–759

Title

ABSORPTION OF FERTILIZER PHOSPHORUS BY SUGAR BEETS AS INFLUENCED BY PLACEMENT OF PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN

C. H. E. Werkhoven; M. H. Miller Canadian Journal of Soil Science 1960. doi:10.4141/cjss60-006

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-ccf75f32155b048c5e721b20be8eec8da78f14af384019f477300ac939590e98 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.