Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Limited nutrient supply lowered storage-root nitrogen accumulation rate early in the season.

A claim from Effect of differentiated fertilizing systems on nitrogen accumulation patterns during the growing season – sugar beet as an example · 2012

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited nutrient supply lowered storage-root nitrogen accumulation rate early in the season.

Taxon
beet plantsBeta vulgarise0
Treatment
less than 50% of the recommended N rate and without Ke0
Outcome
rate of nitrogen accumulation in storage rootse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
first part of the growing seasone0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Limited supply of nutrients to beet plants, caused by the course of the weather or the applied fertilizers (less than 50% of the recommended N rate and without K), was the main reason for a lower rate of nitrogen accumulation in storage roots in the first part of the growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1383

Title

Effect of differentiated fertilizing systems on nitrogen accumulation patterns during the growing season – sugar beet as an example

Witold Szczepaniak; Karol Pepliński; Przemysław Barłóg; et al. Journal of Elementology 2012. doi:10.5601/jelem.2012.17.4.10

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-39ceffe7fbe4bfb8ccca4f4e03de30ce9622045d78a84c96152dceb3ec9025cd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.