Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano boron reduced alpha-amino N content and sugar loss to molasses in the second season relative to other sprays.

A claim from IMPACT OFHUMIC ACID AND FOLIAR APPLICATION OF IRON, MANGANESE AND BORON NANOPARTICLES ON SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano boron reduced alpha-amino N content and sugar loss to molasses in the second season relative to other sprays.

Taxon
beet plantsBeta vulgarise0
Treatment
Nano borone0
Outcome
alpha-amino N content and sugar lost to molasses%e1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
the rest of the treatmentse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sprayed beet plants with Nano boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1680
e1

“alpha-amino N content and sugar lost to molasses% were reduced in the second season compared to beets sprayed with the rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–2027

Title

IMPACT OFHUMIC ACID AND FOLIAR APPLICATION OF IRON, MANGANESE AND BORON NANOPARTICLES ON SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY

elaraby salim; Hitham E.A. Nemeat-Alla; Ibrahim S. H. Elgamal Menoufia Journal of Plant Production 2024. doi:10.21608/mjppf.2024.253616.1037

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-ac71e737234e425a8c8125b2736d2038c37d10be906e14b21adc41781f40857e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

boron atom · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.