Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Boron, Potassium Sources and Rates on Soil Fertility, Sugar Beet Yield and Quality Cultivated in Saline Clay Soil in Egypt

Zeinab M. Abd EL-Rahman; Khaled A. H. Shaban; Mohamed I. Mohaseb; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at a private farm in El-QantaraSharq, Ismailia Governorate, Egypt, during the 2021/22 and 2022/23 winter growing seasons. The study aimed to assess the effect of boron and potassium sources and rates on sugar beet yield quality and soil fertility. The experiments were arranged in a split-split plot design. The main plots had foliar boron (B) application (without and with 4 g B/L), while the sub-main plots had potassium sources: K-sulfate, K-silicate, and K-humate. The sub-plots had potassium rates (0, 4, 8, and 12 g/L) applied as foliar spray at three intervals: 30, 45, and 75 days after planting. Results indicated that foliar boron application led to a 17.17% decrease in soil electrical conductivity (EC) compared to without boron spraying. However, there was no significant change in pH values. The study showed a significant increase in soil available N, P, K, Fe, Mn, Zn, and B with the application of 4 g/L of boron or K-humate at a rate of 12 g/L individually. Sugar beet yield, quality and root nutrients content were notably influenced by potassium sources in the following order: K-humate > K-silicate > K-sulfate. The interaction between boron spray and potassium sources and rates had a significant effect on various parameters, with the highest values for root length (cm), fresh root weight (kg/plant), root and top yield (t/ha), protein (%),sugar content (%) and sugar yield (t/ha) achieved by foliar application of boron combined with K-humate at a rate of 12 g/L.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron spray reduced soil electrical conductivity by 17.17%.

Treatment
foliar boron applicatione0
Outcome
soil electrical conductivity (EC)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
17.17%e0
Comparator
without boron sprayinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“foliar boron application led to a 17.17% decrease in soil electrical conductivity (EC) compared to without boron spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron spray did not significantly change soil pH.

Treatment
foliar boron applicatione0
Outcome
pH valuese0
Direction
no significant changee0
Comparator
without boron sprayinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“foliar boron application led to a 17.17% decrease in soil electrical conductivity (EC) compared to without boron spraying. However, there was no significant change in pH values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron at 4 g/L increased available soil nutrients.

Treatment
4 g/L of borone0
Outcome
soil available N, P, K, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Be0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in soil available N, P, K, Fe, Mn, Zn, and B with the application of 4 g/L of boron or K-humate at a rate of 12 g/L individually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K-humate at 12 g/L increased available soil nutrients.

Treatment
K-humate at a rate of 12 g/Le0
Outcome
soil available N, P, K, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Be0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in soil available N, P, K, Fe, Mn, Zn, and B with the application of 4 g/L of boron or K-humate at a rate of 12 g/L individually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1011 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium sources ranked K-humate, K-silicate, then K-sulfate for beet yield, quality and root nutrients.

Treatment
potassium sourcese0
Outcome
yield, quality and root nutrients contente0
Direction
K-humate > K-silicate > K-sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet yield, quality and root nutrients content were notably influenced by potassium sources in the following order: K-humate > K-silicate > K-sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron combined with K-humate at 12 g/L gave the highest root length, root weight, and root and top yields.

Treatment
foliar application of boron combined with K-humate at a rate of 12 g/Le0
Outcome
root length (cm), fresh root weight (kg/plant), root and top yield (t/ha)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest values for root length (cm), fresh root weight (kg/plant), root and top yield (t/ha), protein (%),sugar content (%) and sugar yield (t/ha) achieved by foliar application of boron combined with K-humate at a rate of 12 g/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron combined with K-humate at 12 g/L gave the highest protein, sugar content and sugar yield.

Treatment
foliar application of boron combined with K-humate at a rate of 12 g/Le0
Outcome
protein (%),sugar content (%) and sugar yield (t/ha)e0
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein (%),sugar content (%) and sugar yield (t/ha) achieved by foliar application of boron combined with K-humate at a rate of 12 g/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1524 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest values for root length (cm), fresh root weight (kg/plant), root and top yield (t/ha), protein (%),sugar content (%) and sugar yield (t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1441 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑

boron atom · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

boron atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

35 papers: 30 positive, 5 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

application · quality: protein · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.