Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out at Kafr El-Hamam Research Station, Zagazig district, Sharkia Governorate, Agricultural Research Center during 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 seasons to study the effect of biofertilization treatments (control, microbin, rhizobacterin, phosphorin and their interactions) and mineral nitrogen fertilizer levels (0, 40, 80 and 120 kg N/fed) on yield and quality of sugar beet cv. Plino. The main findings of this investigation could be summarized as follows: 1- Application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin+ Phosphorien produced the highest values of all studied characters in both growing seasons as compared with using each bio-fertilizer alone. It was followed by application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin then application the mixture of Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien in the two growing seasons. 2- Fertilizing sugar beet plants with 120 kg N/fed produced the highest values of root length and diameter, root and foliage fresh weights, TSS %, root and sugar yields/fed in the two seasons. However, the highest means of sucrose % and apparent purity % were resulted from control treatment (0 kg N/fed) in the two growing seasons. 3- The interaction between both studied factors had a significant effect on all studied characters in the two growing seasons. Generally, it could be concluded that application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien as biofertilizers and adding 120 kg N/fed as a mineral fertilization for maximizing sugar beet productivity under the environmental conditions of Zagazig district,.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
The three-product biofertilizer mixture gave the highest studied character values.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEET
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin+ Phosphoriene0
- Outcome
- all studied characterse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- both growing seasonse0
- Comparator
- each bio-fertilizer alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin+ Phosphorien produced the highest values of all studied characters in both growing seasons as compared with using each bio-fertilizer alone.”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
The Microbeen plus Rhizobacterin mixture ranked next for studied characters.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEET
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterine0
- Outcome
- It was followede0
- Direction
- followede0
- Qualifier
- two growing seasonse0
- Comparator
- mixture of Rhizobacterin + Phosphoriene0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“It was followed by application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin then application the mixture of Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien in the two growing seasons.”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
At 120 kg N/fed, root length and diameter were highest.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- 120 kg N/fede0
- Outcome
- root length and diametere0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fertilizing sugar beet plants with 120 kg N/fed produced the highest values of root length and diameter, root and foliage fresh weights, TSS %, root and sugar yields/fed in the two seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
At 120 kg N/fed, root and foliage fresh weights were highest.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- 120 kg N/fede0
- Outcome
- root and foliage fresh weightse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fertilizing sugar beet plants with 120 kg N/fed produced the highest values of root length and diameter, root and foliage fresh weights, TSS %, root and sugar yields/fed in the two seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
At 120 kg N/fed, TSS was highest.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- 120 kg N/fede0
- Outcome
- TSS %e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fertilizing sugar beet plants with 120 kg N/fed produced the highest values of root length and diameter, root and foliage fresh weights, TSS %, root and sugar yields/fed in the two seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
At 120 kg N/fed, root and sugar yields were highest.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- 120 kg N/fede0
- Outcome
- root and sugar yields/fede0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fertilizing sugar beet plants with 120 kg N/fed produced the highest values of root length and diameter, root and foliage fresh weights, TSS %, root and sugar yields/fed in the two seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Control nitrogen treatment had the highest sucrose percentage.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- control treatment (0 kg N/fed)e0
- Outcome
- sucrose %e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the highest means of sucrose % and apparent purity % were resulted from control treatment (0 kg N/fed) in the two growing seasons.”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Control nitrogen treatment had the highest apparent purity percentage.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- control treatment (0 kg N/fed)e0
- Outcome
- apparent purity %e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the highest means of sucrose % and apparent purity % were resulted from control treatment (0 kg N/fed) in the two growing seasons.”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer and nitrogen level interacted significantly across all studied characters.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEET
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- both studied factorse0
- Outcome
- all studied characterse0
- Qualifier
- two growing seasonse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The interaction between both studied factors had a significant effect on all studied characters in the two growing seasons.”
t0“SUGAR BEET”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend the three-product biofertilizer mixture plus 120 kg N/fed to maximize productivity in Zagazig district.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Outcome
- application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien as biofertilizers and adding 120 kg N/fede0
- Setting
- Zagazig districte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien as biofertilizers and adding 120 kg N/fed as a mineral fertilization for maximizing sugar beet productivity under the environmental conditions of Zagazig district,”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
104 papers more in this group
See all 108 papers →nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.