Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF BIO AND MINERAL FERTILIZATION ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET

H. Sarhan

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at Kafr El-Hamam Research Station, Zagazig district, Sharkia Governorate, Agricultural Research Center during 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 seasons to study the effect of biofertilization treatments (control, microbin, rhizobacterin, phosphorin and their interactions) and mineral nitrogen fertilizer levels (0, 40, 80 and 120 kg N/fed) on yield and quality of sugar beet cv. Plino. The main findings of this investigation could be summarized as follows: 1- Application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin+ Phosphorien produced the highest values of all studied characters in both growing seasons as compared with using each bio-fertilizer alone. It was followed by application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin then application the mixture of Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien in the two growing seasons. 2- Fertilizing sugar beet plants with 120 kg N/fed produced the highest values of root length and diameter, root and foliage fresh weights, TSS %, root and sugar yields/fed in the two seasons. However, the highest means of sucrose % and apparent purity % were resulted from control treatment (0 kg N/fed) in the two growing seasons. 3- The interaction between both studied factors had a significant effect on all studied characters in the two growing seasons. Generally, it could be concluded that application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien as biofertilizers and adding 120 kg N/fed as a mineral fertilization for maximizing sugar beet productivity under the environmental conditions of Zagazig district,.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-product biofertilizer mixture gave the highest studied character values.

Treatment
mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin+ Phosphoriene0
Outcome
all studied characterse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both growing seasonse0
Comparator
each bio-fertilizer alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin+ Phosphorien produced the highest values of all studied characters in both growing seasons as compared with using each bio-fertilizer alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Microbeen plus Rhizobacterin mixture ranked next for studied characters.

Treatment
mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterine0
Outcome
It was followede0
Direction
followede0
Qualifier
two growing seasonse0
Comparator
mixture of Rhizobacterin + Phosphoriene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was followed by application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin then application the mixture of Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien in the two growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg N/fed, root length and diameter were highest.

Treatment
120 kg N/fede0
Outcome
root length and diametere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizing sugar beet plants with 120 kg N/fed produced the highest values of root length and diameter, root and foliage fresh weights, TSS %, root and sugar yields/fed in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg N/fed, root and foliage fresh weights were highest.

Treatment
120 kg N/fede0
Outcome
root and foliage fresh weightse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizing sugar beet plants with 120 kg N/fed produced the highest values of root length and diameter, root and foliage fresh weights, TSS %, root and sugar yields/fed in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg N/fed, TSS was highest.

Treatment
120 kg N/fede0
Outcome
TSS %e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizing sugar beet plants with 120 kg N/fed produced the highest values of root length and diameter, root and foliage fresh weights, TSS %, root and sugar yields/fed in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg N/fed, root and sugar yields were highest.

Treatment
120 kg N/fede0
Outcome
root and sugar yields/fede0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizing sugar beet plants with 120 kg N/fed produced the highest values of root length and diameter, root and foliage fresh weights, TSS %, root and sugar yields/fed in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control nitrogen treatment had the highest sucrose percentage.

Treatment
control treatment (0 kg N/fed)e0
Outcome
sucrose %e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest means of sucrose % and apparent purity % were resulted from control treatment (0 kg N/fed) in the two growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control nitrogen treatment had the highest apparent purity percentage.

Treatment
control treatment (0 kg N/fed)e0
Outcome
apparent purity %e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest means of sucrose % and apparent purity % were resulted from control treatment (0 kg N/fed) in the two growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer and nitrogen level interacted significantly across all studied characters.

Treatment
both studied factorse0
Outcome
all studied characterse0
Qualifier
two growing seasonse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between both studied factors had a significant effect on all studied characters in the two growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the three-product biofertilizer mixture plus 120 kg N/fed to maximize productivity in Zagazig district.

Outcome
application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien as biofertilizers and adding 120 kg N/fede0
Setting
Zagazig districte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application the mixture of Microbeen + Rhizobacterin + Phosphorien as biofertilizers and adding 120 kg N/fed as a mineral fertilization for maximizing sugar beet productivity under the environmental conditions of Zagazig district,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1573 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 29 positive, 37 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 97 positive, 11 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.