Paper · 1981 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Sugarbeet Response to Incremental Application of Nitrogen with High Frequency Sprinkler Irrigation

S. Roberts; W. H. Weaver; A. W. Richards

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Applying N in sprinkler H 2 O during June and July was compared with topdressing earlier at thinning for sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.) grown in a split‐plot experiment with high‐frequency irrigation treatments of 50, 75, and 100% replacement of evapotranspiration (ET). Nitrogen was applied preplant at a rate of 70 kg/ha in all treatments. Sprinkling N too late in July significantly decreased sucrose content, averaged over N rates of 112, 224, and 336 kg/ha and moisture regimes, to 17.2% compared with 17.7% for topdressed N. Sugarbeet yield and percent sucrose at each combination of N rate and irrigation regime were similar with both methods of supplemental N application. Deficit irrigation (50 or 75% ET replacement) gave significantly higher sucrose percentages than full (100%) replacement, but the 50% ET‐replacement regime decreased beet yields by 10 metric tons/ha for a net loss of sugar yield. The optimum N rate was 224 kg/ha, with petiole NO 3 ‐N averaging just under 1% at the end of July and approaching 0.1% by the end of August. Results show that sugarbeet yields were only slightly lower, with two thirds of the total N at the optimum N rate applied in sprinkler H 2 O than by topdressing at thinning in early June. However, percent sucrose was significantly lower with N applications in sprinkler H 2 O, which resulted in much lower sugar yields with delayed N applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late July sprinkler nitrogen reduced sucrose content to 17.2%, versus 17.7% with topdressing.

Treatment
Sprinkling N too late in Julye0
Outcome
sucrose contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
17.2%e0
Qualifier
17.7%e0
Comparator
topdressed Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sprinkling N too late in July significantly decreased sucrose content, averaged over N rates of 112, 224, and 336 kg/ha and moisture regimes, to 17.2% compared with 17.7% for topdressed N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–538 · show in text ↑
t0

“for sugarbeets ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarbeet yield was similar between supplemental nitrogen methods at each N rate and irrigation regime.

Treatment
both methods of supplemental N applicatione0
Outcome
Sugarbeet yielde0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarbeet yield and percent sucrose at each combination of N rate and irrigation regime were similar with both methods of supplemental N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percent sucrose was similar between supplemental nitrogen methods at each N rate and irrigation regime.

Treatment
both methods of supplemental N applicatione0
Outcome
percent sucrosee0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarbeet yield and percent sucrose at each combination of N rate and irrigation regime were similar with both methods of supplemental N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation gave higher sucrose percentages than full ET replacement.

Treatment
Deficit irrigation (50 or 75% ET replacement)e0
Outcome
sucrose percentagese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
full (100%) replacemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficit irrigation (50 or 75% ET replacement) gave significantly higher sucrose percentages than full (100%) replacement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% ET replacement regime reduced beet yields by 10 metric tons/ha.

Treatment
50% ET‐replacement regimee0
Outcome
beet yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
10 metric tons/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 50% ET‐replacement regime decreased beet yields by 10 metric tons/ha for a net loss of sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% ET replacement regime caused a net loss of sugar yield.

Treatment
50% ET‐replacement regimee0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 50% ET‐replacement regime decreased beet yields by 10 metric tons/ha for a net loss of sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported optimum N rate was 224 kg/ha.

Outcome
optimum N ratee0
Value
224 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum N rate was 224 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the optimum N rate, petiole nitrate N was just under 1% at July end.

Organ / stage
petiolee0
Outcome
petiole NO 3 ‐Ne0
Value
just under 1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“petiole NO 3 ‐N averaging just under 1% at the end of July”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the optimum N rate, petiole nitrate N approached 0.1% at August end.

Outcome
petiole NO 3 ‐Nt0
Value
0.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“approaching 0.1% by the end of August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“petiole NO 3 ‐N averaging just under 1% at the end of July”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sugarbeet Response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler application of two thirds of optimum N gave only slightly lower sugarbeet yields than early topdressing.

Treatment
two thirds of the total N at the optimum N rate applied in sprinkler H 2 Oe0
Outcome
sugarbeet yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
topdressing at thinning in early Junee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugarbeet yields were only slightly lower, with two thirds of the total N at the optimum N rate applied in sprinkler H 2 O than by topdressing at thinning in early June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler nitrogen application significantly lowered percent sucrose.

Treatment
N applications in sprinkler H 2 Oe0
Outcome
percent sucrosee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percent sucrose was significantly lower with N applications in sprinkler H 2 O”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed nitrogen application produced much lower sugar yields.

Treatment
delayed N applicationse0
Outcome
sugar yieldse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“much lower sugar yields with delayed N applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

113 papers: 79 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 29 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 142 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.