Paper · 2023 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of irrigation with magnetized water and spraying boron-sugar alcohol complex on yield and quality of sugar beet under west-west El-Minya conditions

Salah A.A.M. Enan; Hitham E.A. Nemeat Alla; Mahmoud M.A. Shabana

13
claims
31
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at the research farm of west-west El-Minya, (latitude of 28.24o N and longitude of 29.59o E with 134 meters elevation above sea level), El- Minya Governorate, Egypt, in the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 seasons to find out the effect of magnetizing irrigation water and foliar application of boron-sugar alcohol complex on growth, yield, and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.), under drip irrigation system in sandy soil. This work included ten treatments representing the combinations of two types of irrigation water [irrigation with well water (the conventional practice) and watering with magnetized well water] and five levels of boron-sugar alcohol complex (zero, 50,100,150, and 200 ppm/fed), equivalent to (zero, 2.36, 4.72, 7.08 and 9.44 cm3) of the compound containing 15% boron, which was sprayed twice at 65 and 85 days from sowing. A split-plot randomized complete block design in arrangement with four replications was used. Results revealed that sugar beet plants irrigated with magnetized well water had better performance and productivity than those received well water without magnetization. Leaf area index, photosynthetic pigments, root criteria, percentages of sucrose, extracted sugar and quality index, as well as root, top, and sugar yields/fed increased compared to that received non-magnetized well water. However, impurities contents and sugar lost to molasses% were insignificantly affected in both seasons. Spraying beets with 150 and/or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex gave the highest values of sucrose, extracted sugar percentages, quality index, root, and top yields/fed in both seasons, as well as sugar yield/fed, in 1st season while sodium and alpha-amino N contents decreased, in both seasons. On the other hand, spraying with 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex increased leaf area index, photosynthetic pigments, root criteria, and root potassium content in both seasons as well as sugar yield/fed in the second one compared with those sprayed with 150 ppm. The combination of irrigation with magnetized well water + spraying with 150 and/or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex recorded the highest values of the root, top, and sugar yields/fed in both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetized-water irrigation improved sugar beet performance and productivity relative to non-magnetized well water.

Treatment
irrigated with magnetized well watere2
Outcome
performance and productivitye2
Direction
bettere2
Comparator
well water without magnetizatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugar beet plants irrigated with magnetized well water had better performance and productivity than those received well water without magnetization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetized-water irrigation increased leaf area index, photosynthetic pigments and root criteria in sugar beet relative to non-magnetized well water.

Treatment
irrigated with magnetized well watere3
Outcome
Leaf area index, photosynthetic pigments, root criteriae2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
non-magnetized well watere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf area index, photosynthetic pigments, root criteria, percentages of sucrose, extracted sugar and quality index, as well as root, top, and sugar yields/fed increased compared to that received non-magnetized well water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1388 · show in text ↑
e3

“sugar beet plants irrigated with magnetized well water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetized-water irrigation increased sucrose, extracted sugar percentages and quality index in sugar beet relative to non-magnetized well water.

Treatment
irrigated with magnetized well watere3
Outcome
percentages of sucrose, extracted sugar and quality indexe2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
non-magnetized well watere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf area index, photosynthetic pigments, root criteria, percentages of sucrose, extracted sugar and quality index, as well as root, top, and sugar yields/fed increased compared to that received non-magnetized well water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1388 · show in text ↑
e3

“sugar beet plants irrigated with magnetized well water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetized-water irrigation increased root, top and sugar yields per feddan in sugar beet relative to non-magnetized well water.

Treatment
irrigated with magnetized well watere3
Outcome
root, top, and sugar yields/fede2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
non-magnetized well watere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf area index, photosynthetic pigments, root criteria, percentages of sucrose, extracted sugar and quality index, as well as root, top, and sugar yields/fed increased compared to that received non-magnetized well water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1388 · show in text ↑
e3

“sugar beet plants irrigated with magnetized well water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetized-water irrigation did not significantly change impurity contents or sugar lost to molasses in sugar beet.

Treatment
irrigated with magnetized well watere3
Outcome
impurities contents and sugar lost to molasses%e2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, impurities contents and sugar lost to molasses% were insignificantly affected in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1492 · show in text ↑
e3

“sugar beet plants irrigated with magnetized well water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 150 or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex gave the highest sucrose, extracted sugar percentages and quality index in sugar beet in both seasons.

Treatment
Spraying beets with 150 and/or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complexe2
Outcome
sucrose, extracted sugar percentages, quality indexe2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
in both seasonse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“Spraying beets with 150 and/or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex gave the highest values of sucrose, extracted sugar percentages, quality index, root, and top yields/fed in both seasons, as well as sugar yield/fed, in 1st season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 150 or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex gave the highest root and top yields per feddan in sugar beet in both seasons.

Treatment
Spraying beets with 150 and/or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complexe2
Outcome
root, and top yields/fede2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
in both seasonse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“Spraying beets with 150 and/or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex gave the highest values of sucrose, extracted sugar percentages, quality index, root, and top yields/fed in both seasons, as well as sugar yield/fed, in 1st season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 150 or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex gave the highest sugar yield per feddan in sugar beet in the first season.

Treatment
Spraying beets with 150 and/or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complexe2
Outcome
sugar yield/fede2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
in 1st seasone2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“Spraying beets with 150 and/or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex gave the highest values of sucrose, extracted sugar percentages, quality index, root, and top yields/fed in both seasons, as well as sugar yield/fed, in 1st season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 150 or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex decreased sodium and alpha-amino N contents in sugar beet in both seasons.

Treatment
Spraying beets with 150 and/or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complexe3
Outcome
sodium and alpha-amino N contentse2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
in both seasonse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“while sodium and alpha-amino N contents decreased, in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1725–1791 · show in text ↑
e3

“Spraying beets with 150 and/or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex increased leaf area index, photosynthetic pigments and root criteria in sugar beet compared with 150 ppm in both seasons.

Treatment
spraying with 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complexe2
Outcome
leaf area index, photosynthetic pigments, root criteriae2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
in both seasonse2
Comparator
those sprayed with 150 ppme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“spraying with 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex increased leaf area index, photosynthetic pigments, root criteria, and root potassium content in both seasons as well as sugar yield/fed in the second one compared with those sprayed with 150 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–2057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex increased root potassium content in sugar beet compared with 150 ppm in both seasons.

Treatment
spraying with 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complexe2
Outcome
root potassium contente2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
in both seasonse2
Comparator
those sprayed with 150 ppme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“spraying with 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex increased leaf area index, photosynthetic pigments, root criteria, and root potassium content in both seasons as well as sugar yield/fed in the second one compared with those sprayed with 150 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–2057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex increased sugar yield per feddan in sugar beet in the second season compared with 150 ppm.

Treatment
spraying with 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complexe2
Outcome
sugar yield/fede2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
in the second onee2
Comparator
those sprayed with 150 ppme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“spraying with 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex increased leaf area index, photosynthetic pigments, root criteria, and root potassium content in both seasons as well as sugar yield/fed in the second one compared with those sprayed with 150 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–2057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with magnetized well water combined with 150 or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex gave the highest root, top and sugar yields per feddan in both seasons.

Treatment
The combination of irrigation with magnetized well water + spraying with 150 and/or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complexe2
Outcome
root, top, and sugar yields/fede2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
in both seasonse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that sugar beet plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“The combination of irrigation with magnetized well water + spraying with 150 and/or 200 ppm boron-sugar alcohol complex recorded the highest values of the root, top, and sugar yields/fed in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2059–2261 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

113 papers: 79 positive, 34 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 63 positive, 4 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.