Combined mineral nitrogen, biofertilization and humic acid spraying positively affected sugar beet yield components and quality traits.

other · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

1. negative
   Soil-additions of humic substances reduced the sugar quality index percentage of sugar beet.

   Promote sugar beet cultivation in saline soil by applying humic substances in-soil and mineral nitrogen fertilization · 2022 · compared with without humic substances

   Opposite direction

2. positive
   Humic acid application enhanced the sugar quality of sugar beet compared with the control.

   Effect of Humic Acid Application on Qualitative Parameters of Sugar Beet Cv.Shirin · 2020 · compared with control

   Same direction

3. positive
   Humic acid enhanced sugar beet sugar quality.

   Effect of Humic Acid Application on Quantitative Parameters of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Cv. Shirin · 2020

   Same direction

4. positive
   Humic acid gave the highest sugar beet quality trait values.

   EFFECT OF MINERAL AND BIO-FERTILIZATION ON YIELD, YIELD COMPONENTS AND QUALITY TRAITS OF SUGAR BEET PLANTS · 2012

   Same direction

5. positive
   Humic acid at 2.5 kg/fed improved quality index relative to 5 kg/fed.

   IMPACT OFHUMIC ACID AND FOLIAR APPLICATION OF IRON, MANGANESE AND BORON NANOPARTICLES ON SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY · 2024 · compared with 5 kg of humic acid/fed

   Same direction

6. positive
   Raising humic acid improved quality index in the first season.

   Additional Chelated Iron and Organic Amendment Influence on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet under Various Plant Populations · 2021 · compared with 7.5

   Same direction

7. positive
   Increasing zeolite to 650 kg fed-1 improved sucrose percent, quality index.

   IMPACT OF ZEOLITE AND BORON ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET IN BORG EL-ARAB REGION · 2024

   Same direction

application · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

1. no effect
   Copper sprays did not affect processing quality, including where yields responded strongly.

   Responses of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) to Foliar Sprays of Copper · 1996

   Opposite direction

2. no effect
   Copper sprays did not affect beet processing quality, including where yield responses were large.

   Responses of Sugar Beet Beta vulgaris to Foliar Sprays of Copper · 1996

   Opposite direction

3. positive
   Foliar fertilization improved technological root quality.

   The effect of foliar fertilization with marine calcite in sugar beet · 2014 · compared with control treatment

   Same direction

4. positive
   Boron at 100 ppm/fad increased sucrose, extractable sugar and quality index.

   Impact of Foliar Feeding With Alga Extract and Boron on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet Grown in Sandy Soil · 2016

   Same direction

5. positive
   Boron spraying time had a significantly positive effect on yield and quality traits of sugar beet.

   Effect Concentration and Spraying Time of Boron on Yield and Quality Traits of Sugar Beet Grown in Newly Reclaimed Soil Conditions · 2016

   Same direction

6. positive
   Soil application of 8 or 12 l potassium humate per fed significantly increased sucrose, quality index and extractable sugar percentages compared with no potassium humate.

   Effect of Potassium Humate and Nitrogen Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet in Sandy Soil · 2018 · compared with without

   Same direction

7. positive
   In the multigerm variety Husam, algae extract spraying gave the highest quality index (82.50%) compared with the control.

   Effect of algae extract foliar application and inter-row planting distances on the yield and quality of sugar beet · 2022 · compared with control

   Same direction

8. positive
   The combined treatment improved sugar beet quality.

   Green Chemicals and Bio-agents for Controlling Damping-off Diseases of Sugar Beet and Scaling up the Yield and Quality · 2018

   Same direction

12 papers more in this group

fertilization · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

1. no effect
   Timing of N fertilization did not influence biomass, yield or yield quality of the weed-free sugarbeet crop.

   Competition between sugarbeet and Sinapis arvensis and Chenopodium album, as affected by timing of nitrogen fertilization · 1999

   Opposite direction

2. no effect
   Reduced nutrient-solution potassium generally did not compromise crop performance, quality, or mineral bioaccessibility.

   Hydroponic Production of Reduced-Potassium Swiss Chard and Spinach: A Feasible Agronomic Approach to Tailoring Vegetables for Chronic Kidney Disease Patients · 2019

   Opposite direction

3. negative
   Sugar beet quality traits showed the opposite trend as nitrogen levels rose.

   EFFECT OF INTERCROPPING PATTERNS AND NITROGEN FERTILIZER LEVELS ON PRODUCTIVITY OF INTERCROPPED SUGAR BEET AND SUNFLOWER · 2017

   Opposite direction

4. negative
   Sulphur fertilization significantly decreased root quality measurements.

   RESPONSE OF SUGAR BEET TO NITROGEN FERTILIZER AND SULPHUR SPRAY FREQUENCY IN MIDDLE EGYPT · 2010

   Opposite direction

5. no effect
   KCl effects on other quality components (K, Na nitrate, alpha-amino N, sucrose and purity) were mostly not significant.

   Sugarbeet Quality as Related to KCl Fertilization¹ · 1980

   Opposite direction

6. no effect
   UGmax did not have a significant effect on yield and root quality.

   Impact of soil fertilizer UGmax on leaf infection degree by leaf spot disease (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) and yield and root quality of sugar beet · 2015

   Opposite direction

7. negative
   Increasing nitrogen fertilizer decreased sugar beet quality traits.

   EFFECT OF MINERAL AND BIO-FERTILIZATION ON YIELD, YIELD COMPONENTS AND QUALITY TRAITS OF SUGAR BEET PLANTS · 2012

   Opposite direction

8. no effect
   Fertilization did not change sugar beet quality parameters.

   FOLIAR TREATMENTS RESPONSE OF SUGAR BEET (BETA · 2007

   Opposite direction

21 papers more in this group