Paper · 2011 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed management in okra grown in kharif season under middle Gujarat conditions

Shweta Sharma; B. D. Patel

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In experimental field, weed species Eleusine indica (87/m2) was the most dominant weed, while Digitaria sanguinialis was second in order (84/m2) followed by Dactyloctenium aegyptium, Phyllanthus niruri. Boerhavia repanda, Digera arvensis, Cyperus iria and Cyperus rotundus. Significantly higher number of fruit yield was recorded in pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DAS which was at par with interculturing + hand weeding carried out at 30 and 60 DAS and post-emergence application of quizalofop-ethyl 75g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleusine indica was the most dominant weed at 87/m2.

Interactor
Eleusine indicaEleusine indicae0weed
Outcome
Eleusine indicae0
Direction
most dominante0
Value
87/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eleusine indica
Eleusine indica · InteractorTauʻolunga · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed species Eleusine indica (87/m2) was the most dominant weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–86 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digitaria sanguinialis ranked second among weeds at 84/m2.

Interactor
Digitaria sanguinialise0weed
Outcome
Digitaria sanguinialise0
Direction
second in ordere0
Value
84/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Digitaria sanguinialis was second in order (84/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–144 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by hand weeding gave significantly higher fruit yield.

Treatment
pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DASe0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher number of fruit yield was recorded in pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interculturing and hand weeding at 30 and 60 DAS was at par with the pendimethalin treatment for fruit yield.

Treatment
interculturing + hand weeding carried out at 30 and 60 DASe0
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DASe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was at par with interculturing + hand weeding carried out at 30 and 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly higher number of fruit yield was recorded in pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop-ethyl followed by hand weeding was at par with pendimethalin for fruit yield.

Treatment
post-emergence application of quizalofop-ethyl 75g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DASe0
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
at pare2
Comparator
pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DASe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-emergence application of quizalofop-ethyl 75g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly higher number of fruit yield was recorded in pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–411 · show in text ↑
e2

“which was at par with interculturing + hand weeding carried out at 30 and 60 DAS and post-emergence application of quizalofop-ethyl 75g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–576 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.