Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Interculturing and hand weeding at 30 and 60 DAS was at par with the pendimethalin treatment for fruit yield.

A claim from Weed management in okra grown in kharif season under middle Gujarat conditions · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interculturing and hand weeding at 30 and 60 DAS was at par with the pendimethalin treatment for fruit yield.

Treatment
interculturing + hand weeding carried out at 30 and 60 DASe0
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DASe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was at par with interculturing + hand weeding carried out at 30 and 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–492
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23
e1

“Significantly higher number of fruit yield was recorded in pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 1000 g/ha fb hand weeding at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–411

Title

Weed management in okra grown in kharif season under middle Gujarat conditions

Shweta Sharma; B. D. Patel Indian Journal of Weed Science 2011

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-cdbbb3ba054c55df32e9b30472d76b381b89e2fc0391cdd2260205bdaef5a7b9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.